Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

Didn't realise there were so many Glaswegians on this board! ;)

I was born there, but I don't currently live in Glasgow (I study there though). However for the sake of NW, I thought it's best to put the biggest city I live close to ;)

dscf0002gs0.jpg

dscf0004bs6.jpg

Spoiler image below (Shows off Laughing Beauties face) - It's through octocamo, but some people may not want to see. Mild spoilers for those that don't mind looking at a face.

http://img382.imageshack.us/img382/4231/dscf0002pp5.jpg

Looks like octocamo is going to kick ass! And whenever you kill a boss I think you'll get their face!

Edited by Audioboxer

Och Aaaayyyyyeeee daaaaaeeee nooooooooooooo! :D I'm from glasgow too. Well my mum is - so I claim I am :p

On topic though: Damn you Audioboxer! I'm stuck here until the 28th of June!! The sooner I can get home and play this game the better :p

By the way guys, watch out.

Word is the guy who got the game 4/5 days ago (I think it might of been a week roughly) on gamefaqs, has posted the ending :/

Anyone posts it here and I claim insta-ban!

box.jpg

How sweet does that look?!

I hope/wish that MA15+ label is a sticker - Way to ruin a front cover if it's not!

100_3624.JPG

100_3625.JPG

That's the regular version by the way, so it looks like we're all getting the slipcase over the box!

Also gun customization video! - http://uk.ps3.ign.com/articles/879/879291p1.html :drool:

Edited by Audioboxer

For those who obtain a copy early here on neowin, are we allowed screens etc to be posted or is it the same as GTA4 a few weeks back and the staff would rather we didn't?

although I'm getting the game as per usual on the 12th :(

For those who obtain a copy early here on neowin, are we allowed screens etc to be posted or is it the same as GTA4 a few weeks back and the staff would rather we didn't?

although I'm getting the game as per usual on the 12th :(

I'll post screens of stuff we've already seen online in trailers and what not.

Maybe show off some other non-spoiler things like menus.

But I ain't posting anything past the first act, or typing up anything big we don't know before release. I don't want people scared to come into this topic like those around the web just now.

So far avoid Gamefaqs, but really I'd just avoid every topic on MGS4 except this one ;)

By the way guys, watch out.

Word is the guy who got the game 4/5 days ago (I think it might of been a week roughly) on gamefaqs, has posted the ending :/

Anyone posts it here and I claim insta-ban!

That's not cool :( He should go to prison for something like that...

Hopefully you'll get the game tomorrow, and post some nice not-spolier-pics :D

Metal Gear Solid 4: Not Playing Ball

In reviews land, we at GameSpot have been put in a really tough position by multiple developers and publishers of late. We refused to cater to one of these whims last week, in regards to the review code provided to us for Ninja Gaiden II by Microsoft. In case you weren't aware, code provided to American review outlets was not final, and frankly, did not perform well (oddly, the European press was given retail code. The discrepancy baffles us as much as it baffles you). Microsoft announced that many of these problems, such as loading times and framerate issues, would not be present in the final version. Some outlets published a review early and noted the potential differences. At GameSpot, we chose not to give you a review that isn't based on the same software, frankly because we think that playing along with this publisher-enforced mind game (and therefore enabling it) is unethical and does a disservice to our readers.

The more recent mind-boggling publisher requests have come from Konami regarding Metal Gear Solid 4--requests that we believe cross the line. The first involved an event that we wanted no part of. The majority of the American press was flown to Japan for a so-called "boot camp," where journalists spent two and a half days playing Metal Gear Solid 4 under the watchful eyes of the development team, socialized and dined with them, and then provided focus group-type feedback on the final day. We flatly refused this request, because we believe that this puts journalists in an unethical and awkward position. In our eyes, it would be inappropriate for us to participate in the development process. And we think most reasonable people would agree.

[edit: I reworded the above paragraph to more accurately reflect what this boot camp entailed. It was an invitation for journalists to participate in the development process, not a specific reviews event. However, we don't wish to blur the lines of journalistic integrity by participating in development. This was not a previews event, so GameSpot would have published no content based on this visit.]

It has also been widely reported that Konami blatantly asked the press not to mention two pieces of pertinent information in their reviews: how long the cutscenes are, and how long the installation process is. Publishers routinely ask reviewers not to publish certain story points because they are considered spoilers. That's fair, and we've never resisted requests of that nature. However, cutscene length and installation length are pertinent subjects within the context of a review, and speaking on a personal level, I believe it is flat-out wrong for any publisher to request that pertinent information be left out of a review. The journalist decides what information is most important for the review--not the developer or its publisher.

These are mind games that put us in an awfully awkward position. Of course we want our reviews to be timely and competitive, but never at the expense of accuracy and objectiveness. As reviews begin to trickle out from other publications, our audience complains that we're "late," and by securing exclusive reviews and playing along with these unreasonable publisher requests, some publications foster this idea that the reviews process is a race to publication. Publishers create this environment--but many press outlets enable it, without questioning it, because it brings them all-important traffic. I, for one, am more interested in a review that isn't haunted by these specters, and I think you would want the same.

As of this writing, we are unsure if we will have a Metal gear Solid 4 review published by the game's release date. We have not received review code, and the earliest Konami is willing to provide it is on the 9th, three days before release. It's unfortunate that publisher politics have reached this point, where refusing to meet these unreasonable demands means that we and our readers are effectively punished. Please understand this much: We will bring you a review of Metal Gear Solid 4 when we've played the same code on the discs you buy, and played it in an appropriate, unbiased environment. We think you'll agree that this is the only real choice.

Source: http://au.gamespot.com/news/blogs/review-b...aying-ball.html

Gamespot actually doing something right for once, however I still claim an 8.9 from them :p

If they haven't got the review code what the hell does everyone else have? IGN guy says he's completed it twice, or it was the official PS mag guy - Whoever the dude is on that Gametrailers MGS Bonus Round.

However I disagree on their outlook on the MGS4 Boot Camp. Shane talked about that in detail and it was no way a review pitch - The guys who went actually got to tell Kojima what to change/tweak and I like that, as most of them were westerners and we know Konami are new to trying to westernize MGS, so I hope they recommended some good changes.

They got to sit and talk with Kojima at night as well, so FU Gamespot, I'd of been there in a heartbeat :laugh:

For those who obtain a copy early here on neowin, are we allowed screens etc to be posted or is it the same as GTA4 a few weeks back and the staff would rather we didn't?

although I'm getting the game as per usual on the 12th :(

That wasn't allowed because it was a pirated copy, no other reason.

Thanks Audio for not posting anything spoilerish! I really appreciate that, because I'd go mental if someone spoiled the end or anything substantial for me.

Would love to hear from you how long it takes to finish the game and how much cutscenes there actually are... Also, install size isn't important. It's figgin' MGS4. I'll delete stuff for it. v_v

Thanks Audio for not posting anything spoilerish! I really appreciate that, because I'd go mental if someone spoiled the end or anything substantial for me.

Would love to hear from you how long it takes to finish the game and how much cutscenes there actually are... Also, install size isn't important. It's figgin' MGS4. I'll delete stuff for it. v_v

I believe the install size is either 4.5 or 4.6GB.

Hopefully I'll have the game tomorrow, if not Saturday? Royal Mail do deliver on Saturday right? I've been out the country for 2.5 weeks and I can't remember ****! Haha.

Good thing is positive feedback is coming into that seller today for the guys who managed to buy it before 5pm yesterday, meaning a 24hr turnaround.

I won't spoil anything, and I genuinely think the mods of this GH should hand out posting bans for a week or two, to anyone who spoils anything big that we don't already know, and won't know till the 12th.

Telling us how the ipod works in game with spoiler tags is okay, but putting the frickin ending of the game in spoiler tags isn't really "ok" if you ask me :no: :p

Keep the topic clean (Y)

Edited by Audioboxer

Audio, you getting the game a week early?

I just been on the phone to GAME as i want to buy the 40GB Bundle that is coming to the UK but they don't know about price yet. Can anyone confirm it will be ?299.99? The GTA4 bundle that Sony did was ?299.99?

Audio, you getting the game a week early?

I just been on the phone to GAME as i want to buy the 40GB Bundle that is coming to the UK but they don't know about price yet. Can anyone confirm it will be ?299.99? The GTA4 bundle that Sony did was ?299.99?

Should be getting the game tomorrow, if not Saturday.

They released info on the bundle at that Playstation Day event, unfortunately they didn't release a pric:/:/

thinkb>, the copy of MGS4 in the LE PS3, is actually the LE copy of MGS4. So it might be ?319.99 or there abouts, seeing as in the UK the LE copy of MGS4 costs ?80, but is sold out now.

I'm not sure though, it's probably the standard edition of MGS4, and then I can see it being ?299.99. You could get the GTA4 PS3 off of Shop-to for ?289.99 with free special delivery, so if you want to potentially save a bit, keep an eye on shop-toedit:t: I think it's just the Gunmetal PS3 bundle that comes with the LE MGS4 game. Sshouldld be on course for ?299.99 RRP, and maybe a bit lower online.

Should be getting the game tomorrow, if not Saturday.

They released info on the bundle at that Playstation Day event, unfortunately they didn't release a price :/

I think, the copy of MGS4 in the LE PS3, is actually the LE copy of MGS4. So it might be ?319.99 or there abouts, seeing as in the UK the LE copy of MGS4 costs ?80, but is sold out now.

I'm not sure though, it's probably the standard edition of MGS4, and then I can see it being ?299.99. You could get the GTA4 PS3 off of Shop-to for ?289.99 with free special delivery, so if you want to potentially save a bit, keep an eye on shop-to.nedit: I think it's just the Gunmetal PS3 bundle that comes with the LE MGS4 game. So should be on course for ?299.99 RRP, and maybe a bit lower online.

Lucky you.

I just looked on Shop-To website and i don't think they have the GTA4 bundle anymore. I mean i already got it on 360 and i would of been willing to just sell the copy or something.

I just found a pre order bundle on Shop-To for ?329.99 but doesn't give any information regarding what version of the game/or any extras you get.

That is a little diappointing. I feel i could just go down town and buy a PS3 now and source the game elsewhere next week from Shop-To themselves or something.

Lucky you.

I just looked on Shop-To website and i don't think they have the GTA4 bundle anymore. I mean i already got it on 360 and i would of been willing to just sell the copy or something.

I just found a pre order bundle on Shop-To for ?329.99 but doesn't give any information regarding what version of the game/or any extras you get.

That is a little diappointing. I feel i could just go down town and buy a PS3 now and source the game elsewhere next week from Shop-To themselves or something.

If their ?349.99 RRP is legit (prob a guess), I'd say I'm right in guessing it's the LE MGS4 game - I'll go scour the internet for answers.

If their ?349.99 RRP is legit (prob a guess), I'd say I'm right in guessing it's the LE MGS4 game - I'll go scour the internet for answers.

Thanks.

I know play.com did put up a Gun Metal Edition bundle but that has been scrapped because it was never coming to Europe.

I don't mind paying a little extra if it is indeed the LE edition, but it could well be just a regular copy of the game. The RRP says ?349.99 so you think it will be the LE edition.

Play.com don't have anything yet listed but will keep my eyes open for something.

That poster on the Kojima Intreview is way too cool, and yes im staying away from Gamefaqs, i dont mind a couple of spoilers but for them to tell how it ends, its just not cool.

The details of who the patriots are have been released as well.

I really would avoid most forum topics on MGS4 just now - You know how idiots don't care about being banned, and they'll signup just to ruin things for others.

ps. I haven't read any spoilers, I'm just reporting on what the general chit-chat is.

Ryan Payton posted this on NeoGAF,

Good evening, ladies and gentlemen.

I'm breaking radio silence to first, thank BruceLeeRoy for the most amazing Official Thread the internet will ever see. You're giving our official site a run for its money, and now our webmaster hates you.

And secondly, I'm here to to ruin the party by begging all of you to avoid this thread until you finish the game. I guarantee there will be spoilers coming out today that will ruin some of the MGS4 experience.

You and I have waited too damn long for June 12, 2008. Unplug for seven days, you won't regret it.

-rp

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!