• 0

AVG 8 Final released


Question

http://www.grisoft.com/

The web pages are a bit confusing, but you don't need to pay to upgrade.

With AVG 8.0, AVG raises the bar further by providing improved protection against traditional threats such as viruses, spam, spyware and trojans as well as new protection against emerging threats including web exploits, drive-by downloads, phishing, and rootkits. Following is a summary of new and improved features:

New Anti-Exploit Technology– AVG 8.0’s patent-pending safe surfing and safe searching technology is designed to protect users of Internet Explorer and Firefox browsers against drive-by downloads from poisoned web pages and to flag dangerous search results in Google, Yahoo and MSN search engines.

New Web Shield– Complementing the safe surfing and searching technology, the new Web Shield module scans files during download or exchange over ICQ or MSN instant messaging to ensure they are safe and free of malicious content.

New High Performance Scanning Engine– AVG has reengineered the scanning engine from the ground up to tackle viruses and spyware in a single pass, delivering improved performance and speed through support for multi-core computers, reduced system resource requirements, and streamlined maintenance.

New User Interface– Enables more intuitive and efficient operation for novice and advanced users alike.

New Anti-Rootkit– This new component removes and protects against rootkits, an especially pernicious form of malware that can give cybercriminals high-level control over infected computers.

New Firewall– The all-new AVG firewall is designed to protect computers against unauthorized access from internal and external networks as well as direct hacker attacks.

Improved Anti-Virus– Provides improved detection of hidden viruses, faster scanning, and more intuitive scheduling of scans.

Improved Resident Shield– Provides enhanced on-access scanning with the ability to scan multiple file-open requests simultaneously.

Anti-Spam– Brings faster performance to minimize email processing time and ensure prompt delivery of messages.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/622741-avg-8-final-released/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I never under stand the payed version. They really aren't that good of antivirus, and the only reason anyone would ever use them is because they are free. If you are paying for an antivirus why would you choose AVG over NOD32?

  • 0

I use AVG all the time have it packaged with all the computers I sell at my store, So far I couldnt see myself using Nod32 in my case for when I was using it it seems bit for the advanced user end, as for AVG it was quite simple> I choose AVG over Nod32 for simplicity for my customers. Not to mention Nod32 (for me) wouldnt catch as nearly as half of the viruses I threw at it during testing.

  • 0
... and because it's unobtrusive.

i wish that were still the case.

i installed 8 last night and it has a new "watcher" service that's required if you want any functionality at all. that will start up at least two other services, plus it wants to run an .exe in the system tray when windows boots.

and after all that, i still wasn't able to scan a file by right clicking > scan with avg. no response from anything.

i've already uninstsalled and i'm going to try life without antivirus for a while. it's time to trim down the laptop, software-wise, anyway.

  • 0
I never under stand the payed version. They really aren't that good of antivirus, and the only reason anyone would ever use them is because they are free. If you are paying for an antivirus why would you choose AVG over NOD32?

NOD32 is far and beyond betterthan AVG, and worth the licensing fee. But AVG, it's alright - not worth the fee AVG are asking for it. The detection rates are just too low.

And 59MB for an antivirus scanner seems a bit extreme.

I respect both products for what they are.

  • 0

Gee. AVG 8 isn't as slim as its predecessor. :/

post-168601-1204249610_thumb.png

The new UI is quite neat and well designed (Y)

post-168601-1204249719_thumb.png

Scanner in action.

post-168601-1204249874_thumb.png

post-168601-1204250264_thumb.png

*I don't think ESET NOD32 does anything about cookies :$ Impressive...

Test detection.

post-168601-1204250024.png

AVG have done very well with this new version. So I bought a license to 'reward' them (Y) /smug

Edited by 1Frothy
  • 0

Awesome, it deletes cookies. yay.

Version 8 has a noticeable impact on system speed as opposed to v7.

Gee. AVG 8 isn't as slim as its predecessor. :/

post-168601-1204249610_thumb.png

The new UI is quite neat and well designed (Y)

post-168601-1204249719_thumb.png

Scanner in action.

post-168601-1204249874_thumb.png

post-168601-1204250264_thumb.png

*I don't think ESET NOD32 does anything about cookies :$ Impressive...

Test detection.

post-168601-1204250024.png

AVG have done very well with this new version. So I bought a license to 'reward' them (Y) /smug

  • 0
How can there be no impact on system performance when there are 8 services running compared to 2 or 3 of them...

But I would love to see the new UI in the free version.. :)

It will eventually make it to the free version. After all, the free version IS the Pro version but without some features and no tech support.

  • 0
How can there be no impact on system performance when there are 8 services running compared to 2 or 3 of them...

But I would love to see the new UI in the free version.. :)

I don't know but I don't notice any impact at all on this oldish P4 2.8Ghz with 2GB DDR and Vista SP1 X86.

  • 0
How can there be no impact on system performance when there are 8 services running compared to 2 or 3 of them...

But I would love to see the new UI in the free version.. :)

I only have AVG plus Firewall, but I still only see three services. If anything there's less impact on system resources simply because it uses multiple cores. I was already pretty damn impressed with the release candidate...

  • 0

Anyway there are multiple reasons I don't care if AVG isn't the absolute best (with 7.5, since tests with 8.0 haven't been done yet.)

1 - I haven't had more than one virus in ten years.

2 - A lot of the viruses AVG 7.5 missed in testing were older viruses, and my best guess is they wouldn't work on x64 anyway, since no 16 bit or DOS code even runs in x64. Probably most of them would be negated by Vista alone.

3 - AVG 8 includes anti rootkit, 7.5 didn't.

As I've said, my system performance is more important to me than the coverage of the AV I'm using, for the reasons I listed. Nonetheless it's a great upgrade.

The firewall appears to be worlds beyond the old one, too. I haven't gone in depth on the differences, but I've seen plenty.

  • 0
As I've said, my system performance is more important to me than the coverage of the AV I'm using, for the reasons I listed.

Well if system performance matters to you then nod32 is right up your alley. Yet at the same time it also protects you better

  • 0
Well if system performance matters to you then nod32 is right up your alley. Yet at the same time it also protects you better

In the last "on demand" results on AV-Comparatives AVG edged out NOD32.

Plus on my PC NOD32 missed a number of tracking cookies and a spyware registry entry. Yet AVG V8 picked those up, no sweat.

  • 0

One thing that no one seems to have mentioned is how much difference the multi threaded scan engine seems to make. It used to take me on average around 1hr to do a complete scan of my system (around 200gb) with 7.5, now with version 8 my scans are completed in around 20mins. Quite a difference and one that I certainly like.

Also it now checks for new definitions every 4hrs so the protection is far more upto date. For my home system I've got no intention of changing anytie soon, but think I'll keep Sophos on the work computer systems for now.

AStaley.

Spec;

Core2 Q6600 2.4Ghz

4gb RAM

Harddrive 500gb

Vista SP1 x64

  • 0
Well if system performance matters to you then nod32 is right up your alley. Yet at the same time it also protects you better

If only it had even worked last time I tried it, I might care enough to go find out if that's true.

According to someone else, it isn't. That's good enough for me.

  • 0

For free, this is an alright AV/all in one tool, but I sure as heck wouldn't pay for it. For my own systems, this thing runs WAY to many services and will NEVER be installed on them.

I can't stand real time AV protection anyway. Always manually scan files after downloading, which is what makes Clamwin such a good AV, IMO.

AV of choice for me is Kasperky Personal Pro WITHOUT real time protection also.

  • 0
Everytime I load AVG free on someone's computer, they come back a couple of months later with viruses on them. Avast, not so much but still happens. You get what you pay for. Hopefully the resident shield and detection rate improved.

To be fair I've had the same thing happen with nod32 on customers computers. Fact of the matter is they are idiots. I know one girl who I thought was smart, she went to a website that said she needed this application to view the video on the page (The page looked about as non legit as they can get) Up popped an setup.exe and she ran it. Game over. I also saw that sort of page a few times myself. When that setup.exe popped up I was like "HELL NO!"

Like I always say "No amount of Antivirus or Antispyware can protect you from your own stupidity!"

  • 0
To be fair I've had the same thing happen with nod32 on customers computers. Fact of the matter is they are idiots. They think they can open anything they want and the antivirus will save them. Thats almost true, although if its new enough they are screwed.

There is some truth in that statement as well :p I can however make the counter claim that when I load a 30-day trial of KAV, I don't hear anything more about viruses unless they let the trial run out and didn't buy. That goes back to your second sentence, though. Guess you win :) No security app is perfect of couse.....

*Thanks for the heads up on Sandboxie, btw. Been using it daily.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!