• 0

AVG 8 Final released


Question

http://www.grisoft.com/

The web pages are a bit confusing, but you don't need to pay to upgrade.

With AVG 8.0, AVG raises the bar further by providing improved protection against traditional threats such as viruses, spam, spyware and trojans as well as new protection against emerging threats including web exploits, drive-by downloads, phishing, and rootkits. Following is a summary of new and improved features:

New Anti-Exploit Technology– AVG 8.0’s patent-pending safe surfing and safe searching technology is designed to protect users of Internet Explorer and Firefox browsers against drive-by downloads from poisoned web pages and to flag dangerous search results in Google, Yahoo and MSN search engines.

New Web Shield– Complementing the safe surfing and searching technology, the new Web Shield module scans files during download or exchange over ICQ or MSN instant messaging to ensure they are safe and free of malicious content.

New High Performance Scanning Engine– AVG has reengineered the scanning engine from the ground up to tackle viruses and spyware in a single pass, delivering improved performance and speed through support for multi-core computers, reduced system resource requirements, and streamlined maintenance.

New User Interface– Enables more intuitive and efficient operation for novice and advanced users alike.

New Anti-Rootkit– This new component removes and protects against rootkits, an especially pernicious form of malware that can give cybercriminals high-level control over infected computers.

New Firewall– The all-new AVG firewall is designed to protect computers against unauthorized access from internal and external networks as well as direct hacker attacks.

Improved Anti-Virus– Provides improved detection of hidden viruses, faster scanning, and more intuitive scheduling of scans.

Improved Resident Shield– Provides enhanced on-access scanning with the ability to scan multiple file-open requests simultaneously.

Anti-Spam– Brings faster performance to minimize email processing time and ensure prompt delivery of messages.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/622741-avg-8-final-released/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
To be fair I've had the same thing happen with nod32 on customers computers. Fact of the matter is they are idiots. I know one girl who I thought was smart, she went to a website that said she needed this application to view the video on the page (The page looked about as non legit as they can get) Up popped an setup.exe and she ran it. Game over. I also saw that sort of page a few times myself. When that setup.exe popped up I was like "HELL NO!"

Like I always say "No amount of Antivirus or Antispyware can protect you from your own stupidity!"

+1 totally agree :laugh:

*awaits AVG Anti-Virus Free 8.0*

+1 but I don't think that they will release an AVG Anti-Virus Free 8.0, looks as if they're suggesting AVG Free users goto Paid AVG 8.0 :huh:

  • 0

I really doubt they'd change their business plan that drastically and **** off millions of people. That just doesn't work.

I would imagine they're simply giving the paying customers premium access and the free 8.0 will be out in a few weeks to a month. In the meantime there is the 30 day trial of 8.0 if you want to check it out.

  • 0

I think a lot of the infections are caused by one program, Limewire. Almost every home that I service that has kids use limewire. Now limewire is good a file sharing program and a way to get certain type of files. The problem is, these people do not know how to distinguish against file types and file size. They search for a song and up pops 100 different files. I they don't realize that files that are in the kb are probably not to be trusted. Add to the fact some files end with .mp3.bat or .mp3.exe or files that just have the .exe or .bat. You see them all over limewire. If you know what you are looking for and know the difference, then limewire is a fairly safe program. On the other hand if you don't know the difference, its game over.

  • 0
I think a lot of the infections are caused by one program, Limewire. Almost every home that I service that has kids use limewire. Now limewire is good a file sharing program and a way to get certain type of files. The problem is, these people do not know how to distinguish against file types and file size. They search for a song and up pops 100 different files. I they don't realize that files that are in the kb are probably not to be trusted. Add to the fact some files end with .mp3.bat or .mp3.exe or files that just have the .exe or .bat. You see them all over limewire. If you know what you are looking for and know the difference, then limewire is a fairly safe program. On the other hand if you don't know the difference, its game over.

That may be true, I use Limewire too, but agreed you must pay attention to what is being downloaded and scan everything that you may get from there. But this is any file you download from the Internet really so not just Limewire, but really any program that is used can be linked to some infections really.

  • 0
That may be true, I use Limewire too, but agreed you must pay attention to what is being downloaded and scan everything that you may get from there. But this is any file you download from the Internet really so not just Limewire, but really any program that is used can be linked to some infections really.

Yeah sigh my brother didn't even realize he shouldn't be running things named setup.exe when he was looking for random ****. I almost smacked him upside the head right there.

  • 0
People still run anti-virus scanners? It's 2008. I haven't used 1 since 2001. I scan my PC online every now and then...but I think its a matter of common sense as someone above mentioned. (Y)

There are more ways of getting viruses then being naive and running email attachments or exe files from Limewire. It's a lot more dangerous now then it was in 2001. Common sense will only protect you so far, but arrogance will get you a nasty visit from Mr. Trojan.

I don't much care for AVG though. As far as free programs go I prefer Avast!, though NOD32 or Kasperky would be even better if you don't mind paying.

Edited by TRC
  • 0

You do pay for the product and use it. The yearly subscription is just for the virus definitions. They have to put extra work in for that and you think that should be entirely on their dime? Good luck keeping any staff to keep that going if they can't pay em.

If you don't want to pay for the product, that's what the free version's there for. And besides, since paying the license is cheaper than the initial purchase and you get the new versions included, it ends up cheaper with a subscription. (Depending on the company in question, of course.)

  • 0

I downloaded and installed AVG AntiVirus 8.0 (trial version) on two Windows XP SP2 systems and did the scanning without any problems. However, when I installed the same on my own system (Pentium 4 3.0GHz with 2GB of RAM running Vista) the scan hangs halfway through and consumes 100% CPU power and the CPU fan whines like there's no tomorrow. Reverting back to AVG7.5 Free solves this problem.

Has anyone else experienced a similar problem?

  • 0

I updated yesterday, but I disabled the link scanner feature. Seems like a waste of time to me, AVG has an on-access scanner anyway. It wantt to scan before I visit a site, again if I download anything from that site, again if I try to run what I downloaded and it also schedules daily scans. What sort of chump do they take me for? :p

  • 0

Tried it out yesterday but it slowed down web browsing and caused pages to time out, I use firefox and Google & Neowin (amoung others) were constantly timing out. I switched back to 7.5 and the problem went away. I assume the problem is with one of their web scanners but I'll just wait for the free version (which is coming according to their forums)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!