Using tune2fs to maintain disks and free up space


Recommended Posts

tune2fs is a useful tool that allows users to adjust ext2/ext3 filesystem options. Chances are that the amount of times Linux does a fsck disk scan on boot is too frequent, or the default %1 reserved space on the file system is amounting to a significant portion of the hard drive. Using tune2fs, you can change these settings and more to better suit your needs.

Before you begin, you should get the names of your hard disks. You can use the command df in the terminal, or you can use System Monitor, shown below:

post-149838-1204575192_thumb.png

Freeing up reserved space

When you format a drive to ext2/ext3, some of that space is reserved automatically. This is a good thing for your root partition because if you fill up the hard drive, Linux will still have space to write to the log file and such. However, if you have say a 350GB hard drive, that 1% amounts to something significant. Additionally, you may not want reserved space on hard drives that are formatted in ext2/3 and are just used for storage.

Set the amount of reserved space to 0%:

tune2fs -m 0 /dev/HARDDRIVE

Set the amount of reserved blocks to 20000, which should be more than sufficient:

tune2fs -r 20000 /dev/HARDDRIVE

Telling tune2fs when to do fsck

If errors are found on the file system, fsck will run no matter what. fsck will also run automatically after 30 mounts by default in Ubuntu. You can use tune2fs to increase the number of mounts and/or have it run after a certain amount of days.

fsck will run after 80 mounts:

tune2fs -c 80 /dev/HARDDRIVE

fsck will disregard the number of mounts:

tune2fs -c 0 /dev/HARDDRIVE

fsck will run after 3 days, 2 months and 1 week

tune2fs -i d3 m2 w1 /dev/HARDDRIVE

Setting a volume label

Want to name your harddrive? You can do that too.

tune2fs -L PORNDRIVE /dev/HARDDRIVE

Edited by Unholy Moley!
  • 5 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Honestly, I think the long-term play here is for Microsoft to ditch the idea of a traditional console entirely and just turn Xbox into a full-on operating system. They (or anyone!) could release hardware like a Mac Mini or a typical console with built-in GPU and RAM, but instead of being locked into a console ecosystem, they run the Xbox OS. It makes total sense because it pushes Game Pass, Windows, and all their other software. The handheld angle is really interesting too. You’d basically have a portable PC. Hook up a keyboard and mouse, and suddenly you can edit videos or get some real work done while on the go. Something like a prebuilt Xbox PC would be more than just a gaming box. It could be a decent little PC that people might actually upgrade with each generation. And since it’s running a PC-based OS, you’d get all the usual perks like mod support, cheaper games across different stores, and no extra charges just to plug in a webcam or other standard accessories. Plus, if they let you install the OS on your own rig, then you’ve got full upgradability too. Best bit also being Microsoft wont even need to build them anyone can and when they do Microsoft just wins. The competition is kind of stuffed. Those maybe relying on SteamOS might be ok but will still have software support issues and no Game Pass. Sony and Nintendo can’t really offer the same kind of flexibility at all not sure how they will live on. They’d struggle to match something that works as a desktop OS, console, handheld, streaming box, and media hub, all with your game library ready to go, never needing to rebuy games. Console exclusives are the only way they can live I think, but if they ever get blocked by antitrust rulings down the line, it’s game over. I'm waiting to see the bloat that's still left on these and if they let you install on a regular old PC. Fingers crossed this could be the lightweight OS we have been asking for.
    • I take my Apple Watch off at night and put it on the charger when I go to bed. Then I wake up the next morning I put it back on.
    • I don’t get what an ai device like a pendant does for me. As a man, I’m not wearing pendant. Then there is battery life. Battery life on my Apple Watch is horribly embarrassing. Having to charge every 36 hours is horribly inconvenient. Fitbits that hold a charge for 5-7 days are much better, so the pendant would need that level of charge. Voice is actually jarring for me. I find it inconvenient when people talk into their phones and I overhear their request. Speaker phones are fine in a closed office but not when others are around. If the device is screen less, it must either respond vocally or respond via the screen on my phone. if this another health device, does the marketplace need another?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NeoToad777 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Reacting Well
      eric79XXL earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      brynmot earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      brynmot earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Al_ earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      277
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      243
    4. 4
      snowy owl
      209
    5. 5
      Edouard
      187
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!