Happened again :)... Have to call Microsoft. Activation just sucks!


Recommended Posts

I generally don't complain about much, if anything, so perhaps that's why I don't see the point of complaining about this.
Yes, we're all genuine complainers who just love to complain, and you're Mr Perfect.

As I said, I don't find it a BIG deal, it's just a nuisance I shouldn't have to put up with. It's one of those things I would rather not have to do.

activation isn't a big deal. as an IT professional I find myself in mixed software environments where I have to activate Windows over the phone several times a week. It's not much of a chore and quite honestly I can't say I mind much. It could be far worse and far more troublesome. Imagine speaking to a real person in broken English and repeating yourself only after going through a maze of menu options and waiting music. Oh whoa, this sounds like my cable company!

My hat goes off to Microsoft. I don't see why you would complain about it. Even more so, in a home (or relaxed business) environment you can activate Windows over the internet. Is it really that big of a deal?

activation isn't a big deal. as an IT professional I find myself in mixed software environments where I have to activate Windows over the phone several times a week. It's not much of a chore and quite honestly I can't say I mind much. It could be far worse and far more troublesome. Imagine speaking to a real person in broken English and repeating yourself only after going through a maze of menu options and waiting music. Oh whoa, this sounds like my cable company!

My hat goes off to Microsoft. I don't see why you would complain about it. Even more so, in a home (or relaxed business) environment you can activate Windows over the internet. Is it really that big of a deal?

The core issue here is that they are wasting our time making people jump through hoops like this. You may not think that its a big deal, but those 15min phone calls add up over time and if you're doing IT work, its time that you could be spending fixing actual problems vs dealing with a slow as hell automated process or some contracted software Nazi trained to treat you like a criminal the minute they pick up. This in conjunction with redundant WGA checks when visiting WU make my blood boil sometimes. Bottom line: Your time matters and Microsoft is demanding far too much of it. For all their BS talk about how important the user "Experience" is they haven't come close to mastering it.

Edited by VRam

I bet those wondering why people are bothered by this have never called in only to be told that "sorry, but we're closed for the day. Call back tomorrow." Yeah, I'm sure that they have open 24/7 over there in the US, but it doesn't work that way with Microsoft over here.

I had to phone activate my recent install of Vista and it was no big deal. It didn't take even close to 15 minutes. You just type in the numbers instead of speaking them and then a customer rep asks you how many computers it's installed on and reads you the activation key. In fact, going back in my call logs, it took exactly 5 minutes and 34 seconds. Not that big of a deal.

Ive swapped out quite a few things and have never so much as heard a peep from MS. I always been surprised by this. I actually just built a brand new system and used my copy of Vista on it as well...activated it no problem. I know thats not supposed to happen but it did. Its not pirated or cracked ..it a copy of Vista I bought a Fry's and have been using for over a year now on 2 seperate pcs at this point...not at the same time. I dont get how this can happen...not complaining, but how?

Its bad when (all of the following have happened)

You call to activate and get a busy signal for hours and have to wait till the next day to activate.

You call to activate and cant understand the ms rep and have to call back again and hope to get a more understandable person.

You have to reactivate because you updated a driver. How many months did ms leave this one unfixed?

And yes Windows Genuine Advantage is such a warm and fuzzy name for a program that only annoys legit customers. Check any torrent sight and you can get any flavor of vista you want.

So

1) It does not stop the piracy of windows

2) It does annoy the hell out of legit users.

3) It does prevent legit users from using software they legally purchased.

Wow I dont see why people dont love it.

I don't see why everybody complains. Call them up and get it taken care of. If you get so worked up over having to make a less than 15 minute call, you have more serious issues than just needing to activate Windows.

You're obviously the exception to the rule, and just because you don't see the obvious problem with this situation doesn't mean its not valid, and yet you're suggesting exactly that.

I've had to re-activate my desktop 2 times, and my laptop once. With my laptop, all I did was install more RAM. For something as common and minor as adding memory, its insulting to have to call, and the length of the call is irellevant. Its similar to being asked to show a receipt as you leave a store (which is illegal, by the way, but I'm guessing you do it anyway). Its the whole you're guilty until proven innocent concept that is at the core of a lot of problems in modern society. And, as has been pointed out, it does nothing to stop piracy.

On my most recent re-activation of my desktop, after I had installed a new HDD (the first re-ac was for added RAM), I was told by the automated system that I would have to talk to a representative, after already having been on the phone for several minutes. The rep told me that I could not activate that copy of Vista anymore, simply because the system said so. I explained what upgrades I had made, etc, though that didn't matter - I simply was not going to be allowed to re-activate.

I had to call back and go through the entire process again, then escalate my call to a supervisor before it was resolved. After paying that much for a piece of software, that is completely and totally reprehensible.

Meanwhile, everyone who has a pirated copy of Vista was enjoying their Saturday morning sipping coffee and surfing the web.

And you think this whole system is fine? Give me a break.

You're obviously the exception to the rule, and just because you don't see the obvious problem with this situation doesn't mean its not valid, and yet you're suggesting exactly that.

I've had to re-activate my desktop 2 times, and my laptop once. With my laptop, all I did was install more RAM. For something as common and minor as adding memory, its insulting to have to call, and the length of the call is irellevant. Its similar to being asked to show a receipt as you leave a store (which is illegal, by the way, but I'm guessing you do it anyway). Its the whole you're guilty until proven innocent concept that is at the core of a lot of problems in modern society. And, as has been pointed out, it does nothing to stop piracy.

On my most recent re-activation of my desktop, after I had installed a new HDD (the first re-ac was for added RAM), I was told by the automated system that I would have to talk to a representative, after already having been on the phone for several minutes. The rep told me that I could not activate that copy of Vista anymore, simply because the system said so. I explained what upgrades I had made, etc, though that didn't matter - I simply was not going to be allowed to re-activate.

I had to call back and go through the entire process again, then escalate my call to a supervisor before it was resolved. After paying that much for a piece of software, that is completely and totally reprehensible.

Meanwhile, everyone who has a pirated copy of Vista was enjoying their Saturday morning sipping coffee and surfing the web.

And you think this whole system is fine? Give me a break.

I believe you're the exception here. I have never heard of anybody needing to go to a supervisor to re-activate Vista... I think you simply got an idiot operator that didn't know what he/she was talking about.

Look, you can say it's insulting, but I say you're taking it too personal. No, I don't want to be walked over by corporations that have the "guilty until proven innocent" mindset, but I don't see the point of getting worked up over a small call you may have to make to re-activate some software. Nor do I see the point of actually taking the time to complain about it online where it won't do anything to resolve the issue anyway.

If you have a problem with it, start a petition or a calling campaign against Microsoft to try and convince them otherwise... But complaining about it on a forum just seems utterly pointless to me.

I can see how WGA stops a fair amount of users who don't understand how to bypass it, but the knowledgeable Windows users can easily bypass WGA with a few clicks of the mouse. I can see why they keep it, but they need to make it stronger and detect something on your computer to show it passed before, and never ask again

  • 2 months later...

Holy friggin crap this finally happened to me and I gotta say, I do not like it. So whats this for? Stopping pirates? Thats like banning guns...results in only criminals having guns..its idiotic. The only result in this is normal, everyday non-pirate people turning in their guns and reactivating Vista..while the pirates are running around with Vista Ultimate and uzis!

I've added a new HDD, added more RAM, totally swapped out my RAM, updated drivers plenty of times... I've never once had to re-activate besides when I swapped my motherboard.

Like someone said earlier..."Lucky you - geez"

I, too, have added a new HDD, added more RAM, totally swapped out my RAM, updated drivers plenty of times. With the exception of the drivers, I've had to call to activate each time (New HDD, add ram and just yesterday I swapped out my ram).

Ya know, pirates don't have to deal with that GENUINE ADVANTAGE thingy and they never have to call to activate! NEVAR! EVAR!

Therefore, you could very well give me that serial key of yours which in turn will get you full access to an awesome link to an awesome site where you can download a little file, and I guarantee you will NEVAR waste those 15-minutes of your worthless precious life EVAR again!

Deal? NO? Thought so.

Seriously though, you prolly wasted more time writing this thread and getting all worked up about it than just calling the 800 number and talking with the nice Indian lady. :p

never had to deal with any of these kind of issues with my mac or linux machines :D

but seriously, I had to call microsoft recently for this very thing and I thought their customer service was pretty nice.

when I had to call ad0be they asked me tons of questions, had to explain why numerous times, and damn near denied my activation, practically accusing me of piracy, which I'm not doing.

last time I'll ever do business with them.

Besides, I'm going to switch to ubuntu eventually, just haven't had time to ready all my files for moving. No activiation issues with open source :D

I'm in a similar boat to dysmatik.

People, it's true that Microsoft "has every right to try to stop piracy," but that doesn't mean that you don't also have every right to say "Sorry, I don't consider Windows XP/Vista/7/whatever to be worth the trouble of activation to use, so I will take my money to your competitor." They cannot annoy you with activation if you aren't using their product in the first place.

The usual responses then arise, "But I need Windows for $APPLICATION (usually a game)." If activation bothers you that much, put principle ahead of personal enjoyment, bite the bullet, and do without. You think I don't want to play Half-Life 2, Portal, Bioshock and Mass Effect PC? They sound great. However, the activation on those games (or other online authentication/intrusive copy-prevention) is a deal-breaker. I really, really want to play them and am bummed that I haven't, but I am willing to make the sacrifice of some fun in order to avoid giving money to organizations that use this sort of copy-prevention. Additionally, as far as I know, these games only run on Windows, which necessitates me putting up with yet another level of activation and intrusive copy-prevention.

Now people say "But you're only one person, the companies will shrug and go on doing what they do because they're still making money." Yeah, and one vote doesn't count come election year, and one non-recycled can here and there can't hurt the environment, and with all those forests, what's one tree cut down really going to do? The argument's been made and debunked countless times, and the answer is that if more people were willing to put principle ahead of personal satisfaction, it wouldn't just be a matter of "one guy" anymore and it would force those companies engaging in, well, anything their customers don't like to seriously take time and evaluate whether it's the best idea or not. They could drop the activation and risk piracy, or they could keep it and risk losing their revenue anyway as their customers walk away and tell them to stuff it.

As for those users who have legitimate business software that they need Windows for - call and complain to the manufacturer of that software that you want a Linux/UNIX/Mac/etc. version instead. Same principle applies - if enough people demand it that the company stands to lose business over it, they'll provide what is asked if they're smart.

The point is: Money doesn't grow on trees, not even for corporations, and they need a continuous stream of revenue from their customers in order to exist. To you XP users who are bothered by activation, don't buy Vista. Ever. To you Vista users who are bothered by activation, don't buy Windows 7. Ever. Unless they promise, and follow through on the promise, to remove activation completely. Microsoft supposedly has enough cash in the bank to operate for a year or more without making a single sale. To this I say, so what? A year isn't forever, and even if their sales only drop but don't disappear completely (because, seriously, the odds of all MSFT sales going dark overnight are basically nil), it might take longer, but eventually it's going to become clear as day that "activation = lost profits" and they have no choice but to drop activation if they want to stay in business. But only if people actually do something about it.

Edited by CelticWhisper
Whoever thinks a 15-minute-long wall is justifiable is just nuts. (almost) None of my phone calls last longer than a minute!!!

bull**** none last more then a minute.

Takes a minute just to select the correct IVR Option.

Slight exaggeration i think on your part buddy

I have a solution. Since Genuine Advantage only kicks in when it thinks that you've installed on another computer, we'll just have Microsoft install an employee in your home to monitor your computer usage. He'll be able to tell much more accurately whether you've really installed on multiple hardware platforms or not.

I have a solution. Since Genuine Advantage only kicks in when it thinks that you've installed on another computer, we'll just have Microsoft install an employee in your home to monitor your computer usage. He'll be able to tell much more accurately whether you've really installed on multiple hardware platforms or not.

And that must be MS female to check new bigger hard drive!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!