BUFFALO 1TB LinkStation Pro Duo NAS Review


Recommended Posts

I was looking for a NAS (network attached storage) device to connect to my home gigabit network to share files among my multiple workstations. My current setup had me sharing an external 250GB USB drive connected to my HTPC that was always on, but I was quickly running out of space (videos of new baby) and the performance was horrible. My requirements were: web-based configuration, Gigabit ethernet interface, RAID 1 (mirror), and possible power management (turn off when not in use).

I decided on the Buffalo 1TB LinkStation Pro Duo NAS. I paid just over $300 from NewEgg.

The device features a Gigabit ethernet connection, USB port to connect additional hard drives, web-based configuration, FTP server, and power management. Let me run through my thoughts:

Opening the box showed the NAS itself, a power cord, manual, CAT6 cable, and CD. The software is pretty useless but you do have to install it to take advantage of the power management features. Initial configuration can all be done through the web interface which I found simple but extremely slow.

Reliability: I chose to use the device in RAID 1 mode, cutting the storage space from 1 TB to 500GB. I wanted the reliability of RAID 1 so that in case one drive dies I can easily replace it and keep my data. This of course assumes that the NAS itself doesn't die first, I have read horror stories of the proprietary RAID format in the Linkstation that will not allow you to move your hard drives from a dead NAS to a new NAS without having to recreate the RAID array and thus lose your data. There is an always-on fan in the back of the unit that should help prevent premature hard drive failure due to heat.

Price: The price seemed good compared to similar devices, very few at this price level offer RAID 1 and gigabit, more on that later.

Power Management: The power management features are basically limited to having the device power up every time a computer on the network boots up with the Buffalo software running. This was not exactly what I wanted, but it's better than having to walk down to the basement where the NAS is located and hit the power button every time, or leave it running 24/7.

Expandibility: I wasn't really concerned with being able to add more storage, after the initial file copy I realized I had a lot of junk that could be deleted. I could not for the life of me get the device to recognize my USB drive when I plugged it into the back of the NAS. I thought the USB port was for additional storage, it turns out it is for backup purposes. You can run scheduled or manual backups to an attached USB drive or another Linkstation on the network.

Performance: My biggest complaint is about performance. I am running a gigabit network with all CAT6 cables, file copies between PCs are normally measurably quick. File writes to the device were not too slow, the initial file copy of over 200GB took all night (I don't know exactly how long because I started it up and then went to bed). Where the device really craps out is in file reads; just opening my Video share with about 25 folders underneath it took almost 2 minutes (just to display the list of folders, this is normally instantaneous between workstations). Opening a 200MB AVI file took almost 30 seconds, and to copy that same file from the NAS to my main workstation took 58 seconds. That's 3.44 MB/s and 27.6 Mb/s, completely unacceptable for a gigabit device. I was actually seeing faster performance with using the USB drive connected to a workstation, which shouldn't be the case. I know that RAID 1 is measurably slower than RAID 0, but it shouldn't be this bad. More on this later.

Security: You can set up the device to integrate with an Active Directory domain, use local users, or use no security. I tried to set up local users and passwords, making the exactly the same as the local users and passwords set up on my workstations, but I could not get it to work. Since I disabled the internet-based sharing I changed the security to "Allow All" and it magically worked fine. Note on the Internet-based sharing: you can assign your NAS a name and access your files through buffalonas.com by typing in that name, but access is so unbearably slow and of no real use to me that I disabled this "feature".

All in all I was very disappointed with the device. Yes, barring a double-drive failure my files were safe thanks to RAID 1, but questions about what happens if the NAS itself dies leaving the hard drives intact sort of overshadowed this feeling of security. Performance was terrible, my gigabit network normally is smoking fast when accessing / moving files between workstations, but the Linkstation just wasn't up to the task, turning out horribly slow numbers for file writes and file reads.

I paid just over $300 for the Linkstation and have used it for about 3 weeks now. I have since resurrected an old workstation and set it up as my new file server. It's a Pentium 4 3.0 GHz, 2GB RAM, 80GB main drive running Windows Server 2003 R2 with 2 brand new 500GB Seagate SATA2 drives running in software RAID1. These drives have a 5 (five!!) year warranty and I don't have to worry about losing my RAID array if one drive dies, I can easily remove it, wait for the replacement, install it and resynch the array (This saved me at least twice with my old file server). Expandibility is a much easier option, I can easily add drives and move up to a RAID 5 array spanning 4 or 5 drives. I now have Wake-on-LAN capabilities so I can put the server in Standby mode after 30 minutes and then wake it up with a magic packet from any PC on the network, it wakes from S3 standy in about 11 seconds. Performance is 1,000% improved over the Linkstation, the 200MB file that took 58 seconds to copy from the Linkstation now takes just under 9 seconds for a respectable 177 Mb/s transfer rate. Just for kicks, after moving all my data from the Linkstation to the file server I put the NAS back in RAID 0 (performance) mode and tried the file copies again. Performance was only slightly increased, copying the 200MB avi file took 52 seconds instead of the 58 seconds it took with RAID 1, which is still pitiful.

Total cost for the new server: $208 for the 2 hard drives from Circuit City, everything else was laying around extra in my storage closet.

My recommendation is if you can deal with extremely slow file transfers and a somewhat slow and quirky configuration interface the Linkstation is not a bad deal, but always have a separate device that backs up your critical data rather than putting everything in one place. If performance is important to you then steer clear of this NAS, I'm sure there are better options available for you for the same or slightly higher cost.

Well, I had the same problem with another NAS product. I'm also all in Gigabit here, and I finaly gave up and built myself a small server instead with 2 x 500Gb in software RAID 1 with Win2003R2.

It's *WORLD* faster than any NAS setup. Even if it's more expensive, it's worth it.

My boss has a 4tb Buffalo NAS, connected by gigabit and has the exact same issues. He's not too concerned about speed but it bugs the hell out of me because it should be much faster than that. We have a 1tb Buffalo rack mounted system in RAID 5 and it's way faster than the 4tb desktop system in RAID 5, and the rack mounted system is only using 100bt instead of gig-e. It has to be something with the architecture of the desktop raids because the firmware etc is practically identical.

i had a hp media vault- good as a nas unit but file transfers were absolutely terrible.. 5mbps to 10mbps if i was lucky. there was no way i could read and write to it at teh same time with steady speeds. writing small files to it, took ages... so now im currently in the stage of buidling a matx server with a icydock external 4 sata caddy and set that up in my server cabinet and get rid of the mediavault.

i've tried a few dedicated NAS devices-and very very few of them tend to give fast speeds. Thecus ones are nice but expensive around ?300+ for a decent one...

Trouble with a server though is its noisy and hard drives get hot unless you can spend a lot of money on cooling systems.

Well, my "server" is hidden in a closet, backed by a UPS. So I don't have any noise problem and the case came with enough fans to keep it cool. I've put an air vent to let the warm air flow out of the closet and it works 100%. I'm quite happy with that setup, it's fast. I've installed TVersity on it so that I can share all my media with my game consoles.

Well, my "server" is hidden in a closet, backed by a UPS. So I don't have any noise problem and the case came with enough fans to keep it cool. I've put an air vent to let the warm air flow out of the closet and it works 100%. I'm quite happy with that setup, it's fast. I've installed TVersity on it so that I can share all my media with my game consoles.

I have practicaly the same setup, got 4 750gb drives thoguh in raid 5

I alsom run tversity to share media to upnp media devices / consoles.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft brings Claude to its own Azure infrastructure, powered by Nvidia GB300 Blackwell by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic's Claude models are now generally available in Microsoft Foundry on Azure and are running on Nvidia's GB300 Blackwell Ultra systems. Nvidia wrote in its announcement that the models are hosted on Microsoft Azure and accelerated by GB300 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, with Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking used to support larger agentic systems and specialized sub-agents that can operate across business domains. This is great for customers and enterprises that want to build autonomous and domain-specific AI agents using Claude without moving outside Microsoft’s cloud platform. Microsoft currently offers Claude models in Foundry in two forms: “Hosted on Azure,” which runs end-to-end on Azure infrastructure and is generally available, and “Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure,” which remains in preview. This separation is quite important for organizations that have procurement, compliance, data processing, or internal governance requirements tied to Azure. Anthropic currently has 11 Claude models listed in Microsoft Foundry, including Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, and even the unavailable Mythos and Fable models. Billing is handled through Claude Consumption Units (CCUs). Microsoft says CCU is an invoicing unit for Claude models in Foundry, with token usage converted using Anthropic’s published per-model token rates. The usage is billed through Azure Marketplace just like models from other distributors and appears on the customer's Azure invoice, while eligible spend can count against a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment. For starters, GB300 NVL72 is a rack-scale, fully liquid-cooled system that combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs. Nvidia has listed 37TB of fast memory, 130TB/s of NVLink bandwidth, and FP4 Tensor Core performance of up to 1,440 petaflops with sparsity. The deal is also part of a three-way partnership between Microsoft, Nvidia, and Anthropic. Under the deal, Anthropic has committed to buying $30 billion in Azure compute capacity and contracting additional capacity up to one gigawatt. Nvidia and Microsoft also said they would invest up to $10 billion and $5 billion in Anthropic, respectively.
    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
    • When I think about a network, there are really two aspects, the hardware and the wiring. So here is what I would do for both. Wiring: Use Cat6A for the patch panel, outlets, and all structured cables (cables installed in walls). Run plenty of Wireless Access Point (WAP) cables, as a general rule, assume a signal can only pass through 2-3 walls and can't pass through a floor (that is conservative, but trust me on this if you want strong WiFi)  Cat6 patch cables are fine for now if you don't plan to run 10gig, those are easy to replace later if needed. Run OS2 single-mode fiber to anywhere you think you may have a server or sub-switch. (yes, single-mode for everything on a small network, don't mess with multimode unless you are at a scale where that minor cost and power savings will matter). If you really want to future proof, also run fiber to any high density WAP locations, it is likely that WiFi 8 and beyond WAPs will push the limits of 10g. Run 6-12 pairs of single-mode fiber between your MDF and the building's MDF, even if you only need 1 or 2 pairs now, those extra pairs will pay off down the road. Hardware: (its easy to say "get all the features incase you need them", so instead of futureproofing, I am going to take approach of suggesting areas worth investing in, and areas you can save money). Don't overspend thinking you need every feature on every port. You don't need 10g on every port, you don't need PoE on every port. Don't overspend on redundancy either, unless you are ready to buy two of everything, don't waste money buying two of some things and not others. Dual power supplies are worthwhile, but probably not HA or multi-path redundancy.  Get 1 "distribution layer" switch that your router/firewall will connect to as well as all your access layer switches below. This should be a fully managed 10g+ switch with a combination of copper and SPF ports, a few 25g uplink ports are nice for this switch. Given that you said it is a small network, I suggest also using that distribution layer switch for servers and WAPs, meaning it will need PoE. Speaking of wireless, get good professional tri-band WAPs, and either turn on the band stirring options, or limit 2.4 to an IoT only SSID. This will provide a solid WiFi capable nearly everything but the highest of bandwidth clients...you could even consider skipping wiring workstations depending on usage. Access layer switch for workstations and printers can be cheaper switches, 2.5g is a good sweet spot between price and future proofing, but even 1g is fine for most individual clients (the kind that could probably be fine on WiFi). You can consider saving a little on access layer switches by only getting 1 PoE switch for whatever needs it (remember your WAPs are connecting to the distribution switch, not here), and non-PoE for your workstations, because desk phones are falling out of favor. You can also save money here by not buying managed switches if you don't need them--but really do some soul searching there, if you go this route, then anything that isn't on your workstation VLAN would either need to be connected to the distribution switch, or its own access layer switch. Also, don't feel like you need a fancy fabric stacking switches for your access layer, that is the point of the higher-end distribution layer, to remove the need for things like that at this level. Home Hardware: I'm realizing the above assumed an office setting, if this if for your house and home lab then the above still applies, but you'll probably want everything managed and PoE, just because, but you probably also don't need multiple access layer switches. If your total port count is below 24, just skip separating distribution layer and access layer and just get one nice switch with the features you want. If you are at the point of considering a 48-port switch, I would instead get a nice high-end distribution switch for things that need it, and cheaper access layer switches with specs based on the needs of connected devices. For home use, don't worry about home running every device to the main switch, there is nothing wrong with running sub-switches for your media areas and office, those essentially become your access layer, just look for sub-switches with a 10g uplink so sharing bandwidth isn't an issue. Just make sure you always connect them to your distribution/main switch, don't daisy chain, the path should never have more steps than Client>Access>Distribution>Firewall>Internet or Client>Access>Distribution>Server if it is local.
    • Google Meet brings Gemini note-taking to AI Pro and Ultra subscribers by Karthik Mudaliar Google's Gemini-powered "Take notes for me" feature inside Google Meet is now available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The features work on Google Meet for web as well as on mobile, and Google says that subscribers can use it for meetings they host in many supported languages. As the name suggests, "Take notes for me" allows Gemini to listen to a meeting, generate a summary, identify action items, and save the notes as a Google Doc in the user’s Drive. After the meeting, the organizer receives an email recap with the summary and action items, while the notes can also be attached to the related Calendar event depending on the meeting setup and sharing settings. The feature isn't automatically turned on for everyone, though. Google says that all meeting participants are notified when note-taking is turned on, and users can start it from the pencil icon in Meet or enable it for future calls through Meet’s meeting records settings. For work or school accounts, administrators can also control whether the feature is available and may require explicit participant consent for note-taking, recording, or transcription features. The feature first launched back in 2024, when it was available just for selected Workspace users. Over the years, Google added refinements and more options, including the ability to enable it when scheduling meetings via Google Calendar. Google's support docs say that the feature currently supports English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish, but only one language at a time. Meetings with multiple spoken languages are not currently supported, and Google recommends using the tool for meetings between 15 minutes and eight hours. The new feature makes Google Meet closer to its rivals that have AI tools already built in. Microsoft Teams has recently started offering Copilot and intelligent recap features that summarize meetings, surface highlights, and help with follow-ups, while Zoom’s AI Companion can also generate meeting summaries from desktop and mobile meetings.
    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!