Recommended Posts

Hard drives have a spinning disk, which have access time and seek time dependant on which track/sector the drive head is at. So filesystem used for such drives have to be optimized to write and read as fast as possible (i.e use elevator algorithm). Flash drives have the same access time for any location of the device, but have issues like the fact that every location on the drive can only be written to a fixed number of times before it becomes unusable.

FYI, wear leveling is actually implemented in most modern flash memory controllers, and probably why it is not part of this filesystem.

  • 1 month later...
Apparently not, but I have heard of people getting the exFAT drivers from Vista to work on XP. Not sure how they do it yet.

No problem...

Go onto a Vista SP1 PC and find the following files:

exfat.sys

uexfat.dll

Copy exfat.sys C:\Windows\System32\Drivers Folder

Copy uexfat.dll C:\Windows\System32

Copy the Following text to notepad and save it as: "uexfat.reg"

Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\exfat]
"Description"="exFAT File System Driver"
"DisplayName"="exFAT File System Driver"
"ErrorControl"=dword:00000001
"Group"="Boot File System"
"Start"=dword:00000002
"Type"=dword:00000002

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Eventlog\System\exfat]
"EventMessageFile"=hex(2):25,00,53,00,79,00,73,00,74,00,65,00,6d,00,52,00,6f,\
00,6f,00,74,00,25,00,5c,00,53,00,79,00,73,00,74,00,65,00,6d,00,33,00,32,00,\
5c,00,49,00,6f,00,4c,00,6f,00,67,00,4d,00,73,00,67,00,2e,00,64,00,6c,00,6c,\
00,00,00
"TypesSupported"=dword:00000007

Double-Click the REG file and accept importing into the Registry... Reboot... Your XP or Server 2003 Machine can read/write exFAT now... It just cannot format a new exFAT drive as exFAT... If your drive is already exFAT, this works very well.

  • 8 months later...

I've never heard of ExFat till now. Seems interesting. However, due to compatibility I'll be sticking with FAT32 for my flash media for some time. That patch for Windows XP to support it will definitely help push it though. But say for example, I want to read something on a PS3? No luck there (I'm assuming).

But of course any new format needs time to take off.

After reading this thread, it's been agreed upon that exfat is primarily for flash drives as it is marketed for that but it is also agreed it is inferior to ntfs. So what can we derive as the conclusion from this? I ask this as i'm getting a massive usb drive soon and all computers it'll be in use with will have exFat support with the exception of a single XP system. I'm not trying to derail the topic mind you but it is getting confusing :)

Well if you ask me any Flash Drive over 4GB should be either NTFS or exfat if your going to store a single file that is 4GB or larger as it makes no sense to use exfat or NTFS on say a 1GB flash drive as your not able to take advantage of NTFS or exfat's 4GB single file capabilities but if you don't plan to store a single file of 4GB or larger on a 4GB+ flash drive then by all means stick to what works for you.

MicroSoft has released a Patch for XP SP3 to support exFat.

Update for Windows XP (KB955704)

this enables WinXP to read/Write & FORMAT drives using exFat

This KB955704 update is for 32bit editions of Windows XP only. Microsoft has not yet made an update like this for 64bit editions of Windows XP and all editions of Windows Server 2003.

also when formatting exfat volumes, you must do so in Windows Explorer or the format.com command line tool. You can't format exfat volumes from XP's Disk Management feature as the exFAT format option is not there (unless MS offers a separate update for Disk Management that can fully recognize exFAT volumes).

Edited by erpster3
  • 1 month later...

An interesting discussion; the advantage to using exFAT over NTFS is lower resource (RAM, HD I/O, and CPU) utilization, and substantially less disk space is wasted...

For Tweak Freaks that are looking to get every iota of performance out of say their game rigs some advantage might be had from using exFAT, but it would have to be the only FS in use/installed because when NTFS is installed so to is all its resource pork.

While Windows CE will install and boot from exFAT on a hard disk, I don't know if there's any way create an installable primary bootable partition that would support and let you install Windows XP, 2003, Vista, or 7... Anyone have any idea how that might be achieved?

:blink:

Edited by hoak
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'd say the first one failed to be as popular as Apple anticipated, but the easy adjustment here is to make fewer of them next time around. It would only be a "flop" if it isn't possible for Apple to recover the design and factory tooling costs given the number of units sold, which I doubt would be the case. It isn't like no one bought them; it just failed to become the new hot phone of the year.
    • You're right that it does not follow the plain meaning of the word, but in this context, it is a legal term defined in 49 U.S.C. Kind of how "wire fraud" laws apply even if a physical wire was not used. Given that it is codified in law, and it isn't just automotive journalists that don't understand evolving technology, I highly doubt congress would change a well understood term just because technology makes the term slightly less actuate.
    • This is exactly why I keep saying we are not ready for human free self-driving. These little "bugs" are may seem like random one-offs. There was also the Waymo that drove between police with drawn weapons and the suspect they were pointing them at. From a software perspective it is easy to understand how those extremely rare situations may not have been programed for, but that is the point. If AI needs to be told to watch out for every possible contingency, then it can never be successful. There will always be the possibility of a first encounter that the AI needs to understand to avoid.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Final by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 | 14.6MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      586
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      187
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      74
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      72
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!