• 0

How To Play Flac's On a iPod


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Convert them to V0 or 320kb/s MP3s and they'll stay in good enough quality... You can do that with lame.

If you want to convert them to a lossless format that the iPod supports you'll need to use Apple lossless, but I have no idea how to convert FLAC to that... never used apple's lossless format before.

  • 0

Quality wise any lossless format wins (so something like ALAC or FLAC), Then it's AAC, or MP3 at a high bitrate.

Converting wise, I can't help, but if you can get it into iTunes you can convert it to anything iTunes understands (including MP3, AAC and ALAC)

  • 0

I can't get it into iTunes in its present format which is flac... thats why I wan't to convert it into the highest quality possible format that iTunes and iPod can support...

Which format is that and how do I convert it?

Are Lame MP3's higher quality better than AAC and ALAC?

  • 0

To actually answer the question, Rockbox: http://www.rockbox.org/

No, LAME is not higher quality than AAC, and definitely not higher quality than ALAC. If you don't want to use Rockbox and want highest possible quality, use ALAC, or use AAC to save some space (Ogg Vorbis if you do use Rockbox).

  • 0

Convert FLAC to MP3

I wrote this somewhere else.

FLAC Frontend

Page: http://free-codecs.com/FLAC_download.htm

Direct: http://free-codecs.com/download_soft.php?d=3678&s=18

LAME Encoder 3.97 Final

Page: http://www.free-codecs.com/Lame_Encoder_download.htm

Direct: http://rarewares.poskolio.com/lame3.97.zip

Razorlame

Page: http://www.dors.de/razorlame/download.php

Direct: http://www.dors.de/razorlame/razorlame.zip

1. Unzip, install, and open FLAC Frontend.

2. Drag and Drop or click "Add Files" to search for the files you would like to convert.

3. If you would like to change where the files decode to, click the "..." button to search for a directory.

*. Make sure you have "Decode through errors" UNchecked.

4. Uncheck "Replay Gain".

*. Make sure "Verify" is checked.

lz7761203964167.gif

5. Hit the "Decode" button, and a DOS box will pop-up, and start decoding the flac, back to the original WAV.

6. Hit any key to exit the box, when done and verified.

pa3631203964506.gif

7. Unzip, install, and open Razorlame.

8. Unzip and copy Lame.exe into the Razorlame directory.

9. Open Razorlame and hit Edit > LAME Options.

*. Or click the LAME toolbar button.

10. Either you can have the wavs encoded to the same input directory or you can have it encode to another.

rt9341203965375.gif

11. Click the "Expert" tab.

12. Check "Only use custom Options".

*. Now most people would want to convert to 320kbps. So that is what I am going to use for the tutorial.

13. Type "-b 320" (without the quotes) into the custom options.

14. Hit "OK".

*. You can also save the options, if you like. Just hit the "Save Options" Button.

df8071203965085.gif

15. Click Edit > Options.

16. Click the folder button under "LAME", to search where you installed Lame.exe (which we installed into the Razrolame directory).

*. Mines installed elsewhere in the screenshot.

17. Hit "OK".

nm6001203966211.gif

18. Drag and Drop or click "Add" to search for the files you would like to encode.

19. Hit the "Encode" button on the toolbar to start encoding.

ui9451203966543.gif

Now go to the directory where you set the files to be encoded to, and either put them on your portable music device or play them instantly!

Here's some common switches for different birates:

320kbps

-b 320

220-260kbps

-V 0 --vbr-new

170-210kbps

-V 2 --vbr-new

  • 0
To actually answer the question, Rockbox: http://www.rockbox.org/

No, LAME is not higher quality than AAC, and definitely not higher quality than ALAC. If you don't want to use Rockbox and want highest possible quality, use ALAC, or use AAC to save some space (Ogg Vorbis if you do use Rockbox).

If you want the highest quality (and you're not using a lossless codec), Use 320Kbps AAC (I prefer 256Kps VBR AAC, but that's just me)

  • 0

Mediacoder looks excellent for most purposes. I was just thinking that according to the list of supported codecs, ALAC isn't one of them. That would be the technically highest quality (short of installing rockbox) since its lossless -> lossless. Not that I even recommend playing a lossless codec on a portable player. Personally, I would convert to AAC for the iPod, or VBR MP3 for compatibility with other devices in which case...get mediacoder

  • 0

Rockbox doesn't support all models of iPod at the moment so firstly before you even think about using it you need to check whether it is supported. You can get the current Rockbox build here and obviously if your iPod doesn't appear on that page then it isn't supported.

Rockbox is excellent in that it allows you to play a lot more audio formats on the iPod than the stock firmware offers. However it's also requires work to get it to install and get it configured as you like it. If you don't want to use low bitrate aac, vorbis or FLAC (which I wouldn't recommend on a portable device anyway, purely as the quality of the internal components alone will make hearing a difference between lossless and lossy extremely tough) then don't bother with rockbox. It'll be more effort than is worth it. Sticking with the stock firmware then you're with either MP3 or AAC, and both are more or less equal in quality so long as you use a decent encoder (Nero for aac, lame for mp3).

I'm afraid I don't have any experience with mediacoder - I use Foobar for all my transcoding needs. For my part i'll point you in the direction of the LAME, Nero AAC and Foobar guides over at Hydrogenaudio.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      575
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!