• 0

How To Play Flac's On a iPod


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I have an iphone, and have been able to stream FLACs through the Orb Live application without much apparent loss in quality, or converting the file. However, I'm unsure as to how exactly the streaming is handled. But this may have implications for whether FLAC support can be easily accomplished.

  • 0

I suggest using Rockbox's wiki page and forums.

You have three options at this point:

1) Familiarize yourself with Rockbox and replace the existing iPod OS.

2) Use MediaMonkey since it allows a user to automatically transcode your FLAC files to MP3 or AAC on the fly without creating duplicates when transferring to iPod. (Not freeware)

3) Drop the idea of trying to play FLAC files on an iPod and just create iPod compatible music files from your FLAC files. (eats up your hard drive space).

  • 0

This is actually quite easy. I convert FLAC to Apple Lossless so I can use them in iTunes all the time. Here's how:-

1. Download and install dBpoweramp from http://www.dbpoweramp.com/download.htm

2. Download and install the apple lossless codec from http://www.dbpoweramp.com/codec-central-m4a.htm

3. Download and install the FLAC codec from http://www.dbpoweramp.com/codec-central-flac.htm

4. Open dBpoweramp batch converter and navigate to the folder containing the FLAC files.

5. Click convert.

6. Choose the apple lossless codec.

What will happen is dBpoweramp will convert the FLAC files to Apple Lossless. They're both lossless formats so you won't lose quality. You'll also get to keep the FLAC files; dBpoweramp just adds the Apple Lossless files to the same folder.

Once it's finished close dBpoweramp and open the folder containing the FLAC files (which now also contain the Apple Lossless files). Select the Apple Lossless files and drag them into iTunes.

I have an awesome stereo which is why I use lossless in iTunes. But for my iPod I check the option that says convert to 128kbps. There's no point having lossless on an iPod because the quality of the headphones is poor. Checking this option doesn't convert your existing FLAC files, it just makes a second temporary version exclusively for the iPod.

The good thing is with dBpoweramp and these two codecs you can use it forever and a day. It won't expire. The only downside is if you don't purchase it you can't use both cores of your CPU when converting, so it's a bit slower, but only marginally.

Edit:- Just noticed this guy posted his question in March. This is a rehash of a topic no doubt already solved.

  • 0

Hi Steeley, you posted this months ago, but I followed your directions and the converted files did show a loss in quality. I had an album of FLAC files that were going to replace files I already had in iTunes. I converted those files to Apple Lossless per your instructions and dragged them to iTunes. However, when I played my old versions, my new Apple Lossless versions, and my FLAC versions, the first two were indistinguishable from each other, even though one was a remastered version of the other. I thought maybe the headphones I was using was causing it, but then I went to play the FLAC versions, and they sounded much better (they played in VLC). It was strange, because the Apple Lossless versions of my FLACs are nearly fives times the size of the old versions I had in iTunes, yet they sounded identical.

What did I do? How do I get the FLAC sound in iTunes?? :( Also, if I bought better headphones for my iPod, or played the iPod through a speaker dock, would I get that high quality sound?

Thanks for any advice!

  • 0
Hi Steeley, you posted this months ago, but I followed your directions and the converted files did show a loss in quality. I had an album of FLAC files that were going to replace files I already had in iTunes. I converted those files to Apple Lossless per your instructions and dragged them to iTunes. However, when I played my old versions, my new Apple Lossless versions, and my FLAC versions, the first two were indistinguishable from each other, even though one was a remastered version of the other. I thought maybe the headphones I was using was causing it, but then I went to play the FLAC versions, and they sounded much better (they played in VLC). It was strange, because the Apple Lossless versions of my FLACs are nearly fives times the size of the old versions I had in iTunes, yet they sounded identical.

What did I do? How do I get the FLAC sound in iTunes?? :( Also, if I bought better headphones for my iPod, or played the iPod through a speaker dock, would I get that high quality sound?

Thanks for any advice!

I'll do my best to help you. What format were your "old versions" in? You seem to be distinguishing "old versions" from "FLAC" and "Apple Lossless". If your old versions are MP3s that aren't already in a lossless format than converting them to Apple Lossless or FLAC won't improve the sound quality.

Say you're converting a 5Mb MP3 file that's encoded at 192kbps to Apple Lossless...you're still going to have an MP3 with a 192kbps quality, but it'll have a larger file size filled with blank space.

You need to convert FLAC to Apple Lossless (or vice versa), or from the CD to Apple Lossless (or FLAC) if you want to have a lossless format and the best sound quality. You cannot convert from a lower quality file to a higher quality file and expect it to sound any better.

does itunes automatically reconvert them to 192 mp3 like the zune software does if you don't uncheck an box in the settings

You can choose a setting like that for the iPod itself...but that doesn't change the original files in iTunes.

  • 0
Oh, and I just had another thought. In iTunes itself under the import settings you need to change that to "import using Apple Lossless Encoder". If you have it other than that it will convert to a lower quality upon import.

that's what i thought, except i don't use itunes i just use zune software

  • 0
Hi Steeley, you posted this months ago, but I followed your directions and the converted files did show a loss in quality. I had an album of FLAC files that were going to replace files I already had in iTunes. I converted those files to Apple Lossless per your instructions and dragged them to iTunes. However, when I played my old versions, my new Apple Lossless versions, and my FLAC versions, the first two were indistinguishable from each other, even though one was a remastered version of the other............

Ok, when you are comparing these files you need to use the same player.. so go and get foobar2000 so you can compare correctly - you will need the plug in so it can play alac. itunes may have been applying some processing to the music (enhancements and such), this would cause the music to sound worse (itunes just sounds bad imo).

Next, when you are converting files you need to make sure that you aren't converting lossy (mp3, aac, wma etc..) to lossless formats (flac, alac, wav etc..) - this will cause a drop in quality. Converting a lossless format to a lossless format (flac to alac) will cause no drop quality.

What did I do? How do I get the FLAC sound in iTunes?? :( Also, if I bought better headphones for my iPod, or played the iPod through a speaker dock, would I get that high quality sound?

Thanks for any advice!

You can't get the flac sound in itunes from what I know. Maybe there is some way, but normally if you want it to sound the best it can I would recommend foobar or songbird or something like that.

Better headphones would make a great difference, you could easily spend >$100AUD (for something low range) - that should get you something good enough. Personally I wouldn't use an iPod dock and expect great sound - they aren't the best for that.

Hope that helps.

  • 0
I'll do my best to help you. What format were your "old versions" in? You seem to be distinguishing "old versions" from "FLAC" and "Apple Lossless". If your old versions are MP3s that aren't already in a lossless format than converting them to Apple Lossless or FLAC won't improve the sound quality.

Sorry, that was confusing. The "old versions" were an album of songs I already had on iTunes, which I had burned from a CD into mp3s. The FLACs I had were high quality remastered versions of the same songs. I wanted the remastered FLACs to replace the old album. The FLACs should and did sound much better than my old album.

I tried reimporting the Apple Lossless files into iTunes after switching to AL encoding, and the FLACs still sounded better. So I played the Apple Lossless file on VLC, and kiwi89 you are right -- it's iTunes that just doesn't sound as good. This is a huge bummer. I use iTunes and iPod for everything, and an iPod dock to play music (my computer speakers are not good). I guess I will need to invest in something different to take advantage of the remastered sound.

Thank you so much for your help, everyone!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • As I've been usually saying lately - we all can thank "AI" for this.
    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • We aren't even at the all-star game and Microsoft is talking about an update that will most likely be released during the World Series if not after. A lot can happen in the world between now and the 2026 World Series, including the 2026 FIFA Cup. Tell me about it again after the FIFA Cup is concluded. That should allow plenty of time to prepare for it.
    • Great, tell me when I have a "Bad Pool Caller" elsewhere not in Windoze.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!