• 0

How To Play Flac's On a iPod


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I have an iphone, and have been able to stream FLACs through the Orb Live application without much apparent loss in quality, or converting the file. However, I'm unsure as to how exactly the streaming is handled. But this may have implications for whether FLAC support can be easily accomplished.

  • 0

I suggest using Rockbox's wiki page and forums.

You have three options at this point:

1) Familiarize yourself with Rockbox and replace the existing iPod OS.

2) Use MediaMonkey since it allows a user to automatically transcode your FLAC files to MP3 or AAC on the fly without creating duplicates when transferring to iPod. (Not freeware)

3) Drop the idea of trying to play FLAC files on an iPod and just create iPod compatible music files from your FLAC files. (eats up your hard drive space).

  • 0

This is actually quite easy. I convert FLAC to Apple Lossless so I can use them in iTunes all the time. Here's how:-

1. Download and install dBpoweramp from http://www.dbpoweramp.com/download.htm

2. Download and install the apple lossless codec from http://www.dbpoweramp.com/codec-central-m4a.htm

3. Download and install the FLAC codec from http://www.dbpoweramp.com/codec-central-flac.htm

4. Open dBpoweramp batch converter and navigate to the folder containing the FLAC files.

5. Click convert.

6. Choose the apple lossless codec.

What will happen is dBpoweramp will convert the FLAC files to Apple Lossless. They're both lossless formats so you won't lose quality. You'll also get to keep the FLAC files; dBpoweramp just adds the Apple Lossless files to the same folder.

Once it's finished close dBpoweramp and open the folder containing the FLAC files (which now also contain the Apple Lossless files). Select the Apple Lossless files and drag them into iTunes.

I have an awesome stereo which is why I use lossless in iTunes. But for my iPod I check the option that says convert to 128kbps. There's no point having lossless on an iPod because the quality of the headphones is poor. Checking this option doesn't convert your existing FLAC files, it just makes a second temporary version exclusively for the iPod.

The good thing is with dBpoweramp and these two codecs you can use it forever and a day. It won't expire. The only downside is if you don't purchase it you can't use both cores of your CPU when converting, so it's a bit slower, but only marginally.

Edit:- Just noticed this guy posted his question in March. This is a rehash of a topic no doubt already solved.

  • 0

Hi Steeley, you posted this months ago, but I followed your directions and the converted files did show a loss in quality. I had an album of FLAC files that were going to replace files I already had in iTunes. I converted those files to Apple Lossless per your instructions and dragged them to iTunes. However, when I played my old versions, my new Apple Lossless versions, and my FLAC versions, the first two were indistinguishable from each other, even though one was a remastered version of the other. I thought maybe the headphones I was using was causing it, but then I went to play the FLAC versions, and they sounded much better (they played in VLC). It was strange, because the Apple Lossless versions of my FLACs are nearly fives times the size of the old versions I had in iTunes, yet they sounded identical.

What did I do? How do I get the FLAC sound in iTunes?? :( Also, if I bought better headphones for my iPod, or played the iPod through a speaker dock, would I get that high quality sound?

Thanks for any advice!

  • 0
Hi Steeley, you posted this months ago, but I followed your directions and the converted files did show a loss in quality. I had an album of FLAC files that were going to replace files I already had in iTunes. I converted those files to Apple Lossless per your instructions and dragged them to iTunes. However, when I played my old versions, my new Apple Lossless versions, and my FLAC versions, the first two were indistinguishable from each other, even though one was a remastered version of the other. I thought maybe the headphones I was using was causing it, but then I went to play the FLAC versions, and they sounded much better (they played in VLC). It was strange, because the Apple Lossless versions of my FLACs are nearly fives times the size of the old versions I had in iTunes, yet they sounded identical.

What did I do? How do I get the FLAC sound in iTunes?? :( Also, if I bought better headphones for my iPod, or played the iPod through a speaker dock, would I get that high quality sound?

Thanks for any advice!

I'll do my best to help you. What format were your "old versions" in? You seem to be distinguishing "old versions" from "FLAC" and "Apple Lossless". If your old versions are MP3s that aren't already in a lossless format than converting them to Apple Lossless or FLAC won't improve the sound quality.

Say you're converting a 5Mb MP3 file that's encoded at 192kbps to Apple Lossless...you're still going to have an MP3 with a 192kbps quality, but it'll have a larger file size filled with blank space.

You need to convert FLAC to Apple Lossless (or vice versa), or from the CD to Apple Lossless (or FLAC) if you want to have a lossless format and the best sound quality. You cannot convert from a lower quality file to a higher quality file and expect it to sound any better.

does itunes automatically reconvert them to 192 mp3 like the zune software does if you don't uncheck an box in the settings

You can choose a setting like that for the iPod itself...but that doesn't change the original files in iTunes.

  • 0
Oh, and I just had another thought. In iTunes itself under the import settings you need to change that to "import using Apple Lossless Encoder". If you have it other than that it will convert to a lower quality upon import.

that's what i thought, except i don't use itunes i just use zune software

  • 0
Hi Steeley, you posted this months ago, but I followed your directions and the converted files did show a loss in quality. I had an album of FLAC files that were going to replace files I already had in iTunes. I converted those files to Apple Lossless per your instructions and dragged them to iTunes. However, when I played my old versions, my new Apple Lossless versions, and my FLAC versions, the first two were indistinguishable from each other, even though one was a remastered version of the other............

Ok, when you are comparing these files you need to use the same player.. so go and get foobar2000 so you can compare correctly - you will need the plug in so it can play alac. itunes may have been applying some processing to the music (enhancements and such), this would cause the music to sound worse (itunes just sounds bad imo).

Next, when you are converting files you need to make sure that you aren't converting lossy (mp3, aac, wma etc..) to lossless formats (flac, alac, wav etc..) - this will cause a drop in quality. Converting a lossless format to a lossless format (flac to alac) will cause no drop quality.

What did I do? How do I get the FLAC sound in iTunes?? :( Also, if I bought better headphones for my iPod, or played the iPod through a speaker dock, would I get that high quality sound?

Thanks for any advice!

You can't get the flac sound in itunes from what I know. Maybe there is some way, but normally if you want it to sound the best it can I would recommend foobar or songbird or something like that.

Better headphones would make a great difference, you could easily spend >$100AUD (for something low range) - that should get you something good enough. Personally I wouldn't use an iPod dock and expect great sound - they aren't the best for that.

Hope that helps.

  • 0
I'll do my best to help you. What format were your "old versions" in? You seem to be distinguishing "old versions" from "FLAC" and "Apple Lossless". If your old versions are MP3s that aren't already in a lossless format than converting them to Apple Lossless or FLAC won't improve the sound quality.

Sorry, that was confusing. The "old versions" were an album of songs I already had on iTunes, which I had burned from a CD into mp3s. The FLACs I had were high quality remastered versions of the same songs. I wanted the remastered FLACs to replace the old album. The FLACs should and did sound much better than my old album.

I tried reimporting the Apple Lossless files into iTunes after switching to AL encoding, and the FLACs still sounded better. So I played the Apple Lossless file on VLC, and kiwi89 you are right -- it's iTunes that just doesn't sound as good. This is a huge bummer. I use iTunes and iPod for everything, and an iPod dock to play music (my computer speakers are not good). I guess I will need to invest in something different to take advantage of the remastered sound.

Thank you so much for your help, everyone!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!