Playing Warcraft 3 using Hamachi


Recommended Posts

Myself and a few other people have always had trouble getting LAN games to show up for Warcraft 3, and before we've never been able to find out why.

About the only flaw we had was the host of the game must be running Vista. (It doesn't matter who started the hamachi network) If somebody can get this to work with the Warcraft 3 host being on XP, let me know in this thread.

First you must setup Hamachi:

Download Hamachi from: https://secure.logmein.com/products/hamachi/vpn.asp?lang=en

Install and setup Hamachi as you feel.

Join the network that you all will be using.

if experiencing problems you may need to open tcp ports 12975 and 32976 on your router, and\or set the Hamachi network device at top priority. Go to advance settings in your network device listing to do this.

WC3 Host:

Must be running Vista (again if somebody gets this to work right under XP let me know)

Host a LAN game as normal

if experiencing problems you may need to open port 6112 on your router.

Other players:

Download and install LANcraft from http://infoceptor.net/files/warcraft3.shtml

Type in the IP address of the person that is hosting (shown in hamachi).

Click start warcraft button

Go to the Local Area Network section and shortly you should see the game popup.

I got a few people in a game, and didn't have any problems, once we finally got it working.

Also if you are still having problems don't forget to check or temporarily disable your firewall.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/626403-playing-warcraft-3-using-hamachi/
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 5 months later...

Just like each other, the software has the different on advantages and disadvantages which version you use, which Garena do have and Hamachi dont have, and so on, everything we need is the software, we need good connectivity, setting and software compability...

  • 1 month later...
battlelan is best

simple and does the job well with minimal overhead

Only problem is that Battle.net uses a delay that is default at 250ms, whereas LAN is set to 100ms.

You can reduce it further to about 70ms by using delay reducer or listchecker, if you need to use Battle.net to find public players or such.

Only problem is that Battle.net uses a delay that is default at 250ms, whereas LAN is set to 100ms.

You can reduce it further to about 70ms by using delay reducer or listchecker, if you need to use Battle.net to find public players or such.

Also you must then own the game ;)

  • 10 months later...

There is a better program you can use to play Warcraft 3 (or any LAN game) online. It works on the same principle as Hamachi (creating a virtual LAN), but it is designed specifically for playing games and works much, much better with no configuration. It also supports ANY lan game and is much more lightweight and easy to use than garena.

It's called Tunngle, and, just like hamachi, it's free, easy to set up, lightweight, secure and creates direct peer to peer connections with little latency.

As of now, it's only in beta, so it's only in German, but a proper release in English is expected very soon. This tutorial shows you how to use it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Djqn-b527q8)

You can download Tunngle from http://www.tunngle.net/en

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!