Prison Break Season 4 Confirmed + Season 3 next air date!


Recommended Posts

I love the show and all, but doesn't anyone else feel that the show was written for one season? Then when it suddenly became popular, they started really trying hard to come up with the next plots. Season 2 felt a bit forced on story line.

T-Bag certainly has the hardest acting job to pull off. I don't know how the real-life actor isn't going to get stigmatized for the same roles in his career - ditto M.C. (:)) Hall with Dexter.

I watched the first two episodes and i don't know what to think at the moment. I felt the same way i did with the first couple of episodes of season 1. Hopefully the next few episodes will pick up because i'd hate to see this show go down the pan.

I thought the episodes were pretty poor. I just find the storyline to be unbelievable (more-so than the previous seasons) and i'm finding some of the plot to be ridiculous and full of flaws.

But, having said that, i'll probably keep watching until the end.

I thought the episodes were pretty poor. I just find the storyline to be unbelievable (more-so than the previous seasons) and i'm finding some of the plot to be ridiculous and full of flaws.

Heh, you just described Prison Break as a whole!

I love the show and all, but doesn't anyone else feel that the show was written for one season? Then when it suddenly became popular, they started really trying hard to come up with the next plots. Season 2 felt a bit forced on story line.

T-Bag certainly has the hardest acting job to pull off. I don't know how the real-life actor isn't going to get stigmatized for the same roles in his career - ditto M.C. (:)) Hall with Dexter.

Totally agree. It defiantly was at it's best the entire first season. I'm liking the quick pace they have set so far in this season though. They have me locked back in for at least a few episodes.

I would not worry about Hall. His character in Six Feet Under was massively different than Dexter and so well done I was afraid he would be typecast after that. He seems to have the acting chops to pull off a few different roles.

Like the last series, it's getting more and more far fetched. Series one was awesome, two was great but three seemed like they were trying to milk it too much and four looks like it's going the same way.

Not to say that it isn't a great show and I will probably keep watching, it's just gone into the realms of fantasy and lost the grittier feeling that the first season had and which made it a better show IMO.

By totally different, I would say totally worse.

Watching the first episode of the 3rd season, I thought it was very poor story writing. The whole thing about the big evil "company" seems so forced. It is like DrunkenMaster said, the show was intended for one season, the plot: break out of prison. Now they're just writing crap revolving around the same characters.

For example: The guy that kills Mahone's wife and kid, why didn't he just wait around till Mahone arrived to kill him. For being able to kill Whistler so easily, he did a very poor job in the rest of the episode as the hitman. Also the whole thing trying to motivate Michael and Lincon to go after the company was also very lame. Another problem is some of the characters are useless outside of the original story in the first prison, i.e. Bellick and Sucre couldn't even pull off a hospital visit and now they're going to be part of this crew... I would have much rather pick up new characters with more intrigue.

PB was always OTT and far fetched. But that mobile data reader was stupid and far too ridiculous.

First two episodes were pretty decent but I definitely hope this is the last season of PB. PB shouldnt have got more than 2 seasons.

some people take it way too seriously, forget about poking holes in the story and saying it's unrealistic and rubbish. You should just watch it for what it is, good tv.

Ehhh I wouldn't call it good as much as I would call it mildly entertaining. It's not as if you're watching paint dry, but it's nowhere near as engaging as other shows.

some people take it way too seriously, forget about poking holes in the story and saying it's unrealistic and rubbish. You should just watch it for what it is, good tv.

Its telly thats for sure, good tho its not. Season 1 and Season 2 were awesome from then on its like the creators put ideas in a bowl and picked them out.

By totally different, I would say totally worse.

Watching the first episode of the 3rd season, I thought it was very poor story writing. The whole thing about the big evil "company" seems so forced. It is like DrunkenMaster said, the show was intended for one season, the plot: break out of prison. Now they're just writing crap revolving around the same characters.

For example: The guy that kills Mahone's wife and kid, why didn't he just wait around till Mahone arrived to kill him. For being able to kill Whistler so easily, he did a very poor job in the rest of the episode as the hitman. Also the whole thing trying to motivate Michael and Lincon to go after the company was also very lame. Another problem is some of the characters are useless outside of the original story in the first prison, i.e. Bellick and Sucre couldn't even pull off a hospital visit and now they're going to be part of this crew... I would have much rather pick up new characters with more intrigue.

Ugh, I've been waiting for someone to say that. I loved season 1, liked season 2 as you have to explain what happens once they get out, but near then the end came and season 3 came. The writing quality is so water down now its sad. They try to be gripping and intense like the original but come off cheesy. Took something good and raped it to death. Can't wait for season 5, because you know there will be one. :rolleyes:

Btw, think a mod can edit the title so it just says Season 4 if we are going to discuss it all here.

I will agree that Prison Break is not what it used to be. The whole concept was suppose to last one season really. Season 1 was amazing in many respects and season 2 was also very very good but thats where things got a little railed off the track. Season 3 was interesting and i am glad in a way it was only half a season as it become quite un-interesting only until the last couple of episodes where it got actually exciting to watch but overall pretty dull.

If people can say Prison Break is watered down then just look at Lost.

That show was pretty dire to be honest. The only that was exciting to watch was Season 4 and that's because it was run for only half a season. Season 1, 2 & 3 were pretty boring to say the least.

People saying the plot is being picked out of a hat........the same applies for Lost and just about every show really as this is what happens further down the line in any series.

I cant believe people are comparing LOST (which is probably one of the most well written shows on TV) with PB. PB is nowhere near lost in terms of writing quality.

It thrives on adrenalin rush and not intruiging story telling like LOST.

I cant believe people are comparing LOST (which is probably one of the most well written shows on TV) with PB.

Hahahahaha you're kidding right? No seriously, that was a joke right?

Hmmm, it felt incredibly "clunky" to me. How can we get all these people together again?

Sona has been closed - that's handy.

And we REALLY have a use for a fat ex prison guard.

Dunno, it keeps getting mroe and more unbelievable. I think if this were a different show, and this were the pilot - I'd have turned off.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!