Prison Break Season 4 Confirmed + Season 3 next air date!


Recommended Posts

I've just caught up with all 7 episodes and I don't know what all the complaints are about, I think it's great. Started off rather slowly but definately getting real intense.

With all the rumours about cancellation, I'd rather they gave it a proper send off at the end of this season, but still thoroughly enjoying this season so far.

Prison Break (FOX)

The dismal performance of Sarah Connor has been partly to blame for the equally disappointing ratings for Prison Break, which airs straight after the Terminator spinoff on Monday nights. Season four began on September 1 with 6.48 million viewers and has since dropped off to around 5.4 million. To put those numbers into context: season one averaged 12.1 million, season two had 10.1 million and the much-derided third season managed 8.2 million. The show still performs well in the coveted 18-49 demographic and the network is a fan - plans for a spinoff are still in the works - so it is likely to stick around for the foreseeable.

[Source]

  • 2 weeks later...

No one else follow this show anymore? :laugh:

I know it is really bad, but I want to see how it ends... and it is also on HDTV :D

If anyone watched this episode, did you notice when "Susan" or Gretchen was about to get her throat cut, and there was a scene with no blood... :blink:

What do you mean the scene with no blood? There was blood, when Secre got shot!

But wow they finally caught the hitman... I can't wait another 2 weeks! argh!

BTW: Mods, Unblock my PMs

No no.. inside the hotel room with Sarah and Gretchen. She was holding something up to her throat and she started bleeding. Next scene... nothing :s so weird

Pretty good episode, but I'm a little mixed on how Sarah was handling her torture. Everytime she thought about it, she nearly lost it. Granted, it's a traumatic experience and for some people it has more of an impact than others, but I think it was a bit over done. Overall I have to say this season has done better than the third season, is around the caliber of the second, but not nearly as good as the first, not yet.

last nights episode was a total waste. I knew some how this episode was going to be one of those first season episodes, where 2-3 problems arise, and they need to handle them before continuing on with the rest of the mission.

Hopefully they finish the series with this season.

I think the whole season and story line are a total joke. I am still watching out of curiosity but I am nearing the end of my rope. I do remember hearing that the show was renewed for a couple more seasons already though.

I think the whole season and story line are a total joke. I am still watching out of curiosity but I am nearing the end of my rope. I do remember hearing that the show was renewed for a couple more seasons already though.

Where did you hear this? If it were rumored it would've been posted. They have planned a spin-off series.

Prison Break simply turned into "Run from the Law." how can you continue the original premise of the show? just making more outrageous plot twists in exotic areas of the world?

Which is why Prison Break was a bad name to begin with.

The amount of hating on Prison Break in this thread is abyssmal...

Love this season. I hope the show stays around for a long time to come.

I dont think its "hate".... more disappointment... Season 1 really set the bar high... and everything that has followed has not produced the same level... I enjoy PB and I will continue to watch it... but the whole concept of something going wrong last minute has been used in just about every episode... just gets old after a bit...

I only thought I heard it was already renewed for multiple seasons. I am probably wrong though.

Don't get me wrong, I am not a Prison Break hater. I loved seasons 1-3, season 1 being the best by a wide margin. This season is really far fetched if you ask me. They take some ex-cons, an architect, a doctor, and a hacker and we're supposed to believe that these people can be some kind of elite task force? Every time Bellick (sp?) is in a scene I just laugh at the thought he is part of this, same thing with Sarah. The only way they can squeeze another season out is if they all get sent to Fox River. My favorite parts of this season are the scenes with Teabag. His interaction with Gretchen last nice was priceless.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!