Macbook Hacked in 2 Minutes!


Recommended Posts

Macbook (MacbookAir) got hacked withing 2 minutes!! :-)

Source: From Macworld

(http://www.macworld.com/article/132733/2008/03/hack.html)

Where: Security Conference open (http://cansecwest.com/post/2008-03-20.21:33:00.CanSecWest_PWN2OWN_2008)

:-D

Prize he won: 3 laptops (Sony Vaio, Fujitsu U810 and the MacBook ) + US$10,000

Edited by guruparan
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/628158-macbook-hacked-in-2-minutes/
Share on other sites

OMG a computer got hacked when the hacker was actually at the computer, im so in trouble from hackers /sarcasm

Nobody was able to hack into the systems on the first day of the contest when contestants were only allowed to attack the computers over the network, but on Thursday the rules were relaxed so that attackers could direct contest organizers using the computers to do things like visit Web sites or open e-mail messages

ha.

so did he pick the macbook? :p

OMG a computer got hacked when the hacker was actually at the computer, im so in trouble from hackers /sarcasm

read the article....he wasnt on the computer, he took control of it by "tricking" someone into going to a certain webpage, which has a malicious script on it, and gives him control of the hosts computer.

directed people to go to a site, instructing somebody is about the same as actually doing it personally.

thats like ariving at somebodys door saying your from their bank and telling them to go to www.whatever.tv and having them enter their bank information to confirm they are who they say they are

directed people to go to a site, instructing somebody is about the same as actually doing it personally.

thats like ariving at somebodys door saying your from their bank and telling them to go to www.whatever.tv and having them enter their bank information to confirm they are who they say they are

You fail. Most sites tailored for specific countries start with two letters, for example, us.abc.com, i'm sure it would be simple to have someone click a link going to usa.abc.com which is controlled by the hacker who then gains access to your computer, not that hard and the person doing the clicking probably didn't suspect a thing.

directed people to go to a site, instructing somebody is about the same as actually doing it personally.

thats like ariving at somebodys door saying your from their bank and telling them to go to www.whatever.tv and having them enter their bank information to confirm they are who they say they are

No, you can get someone to go to a site by a maliciously placed link at a number of places (like a youtube video or something) or an email.

Honestly. OS X sux0rs. I bet my IE 7 with UAC protected mode wouldn't fall for something like this, lol.

Now all those snob Mac users can weep with their false brainwashed statements. IT just goes to show you no OS even LINUX is safe from hackers. Just use COMMON SENSE when computing and don't tell me the Average Joe crap because he'd even hang himself trying to follow common sense.

there is a track history that proves that it would, especially since the hacker would have directed the operator to allow it

I bet my IE 7 with UAC protected mode wouldn't fall for something like this, lol.
directed people to go to a site, instructing somebody is about the same as actually doing it personally.

thats like ariving at somebodys door saying your from their bank and telling them to go to www.whatever.tv and having them enter their bank information to confirm they are who they say they are

No, that's like saying, "hey, check this new blog out at blog.whatever.tv" and it's not a blog, but a site that serves a maliciously crafted page.

the .tv was not serious, i didnt actually mean the country

and besides

Except for reserved names like .com.tv, .net.tv, .org.tv and others, any person in the world can register a .tv domain for a fee. In 2000, Tuvalu negotiated a contract leasing its Internet domain name ".tv" for $50 million in royalties over a 12-year period
You fail. Most sites tailored for specific countries start with two letters, for example, us.abc.com, i'm sure it would be simple to have someone click a link going to usa.abc.com which is controlled by the hacker who then gains access to your computer, not that hard and the person doing the clicking probably didn't suspect a thing.

and besides even that, this is not the least bit worrying

You fail. Most sites tailored for specific countries start with two letters, for example, us.abc.com, i'm sure it would be simple to have someone click a link going to usa.abc.com which is controlled by the hacker who then gains access to your computer, not that hard and the person doing the clicking probably didn't suspect a thing.

The way domain names work is like a hierarchy. the part all the way to the right of the domain name is the top level, and the part all the way to the left is at the bottom. So in the example us.abc.com, com is at the top, and us is at the bottom.

com

|

abc

/ | \

jp us uk

So, in order for someone to create the domain usa.abc.com, they would have to gain control over the abc domain. If someone were to gain control over the abc domain, they could cause a lot more damage than just creating a new URL to trick people.

Now all those snob Mac users can weep with their false brainwashed statements. IT just goes to show you no OS even LINUX is safe from hackers. Just use COMMON SENSE when computing and don't tell me the Average Joe crap because he'd even hang himself trying to follow common sense.

Only reason its said that OS X/Linux users are safer from hackers than windows users, is because the amount of people that use windows and dont have a clue what they are doing with a computer, thus makin them a easy target for hackers

The way domain names work is like a hierarchy. the part all the way to the right of the domain name is the top level, and the part all the way to the left is at the bottom. So in the example us.abc.com, com is at the top, and us is at the bottom.

com

|

abc

/ | \

jp us uk

So, in order for someone to create the domain usa.abc.com, they would have to gain control over the abc domain. If someone were to gain control over the abc domain, they could cause a lot more damage than just creating a new URL to trick people.

I understand how domains are formed, i was commenting in regards to copycat/phishing sites where the goal is to look exactly like a legit site. In my example, a hacker could take that a step further and create a domain that looks very similar to the legit site.

I'm glad this has come out.

I'd rather that other Mac users woke up and realised that we AREN'T magically protected by Mac OS X and that given the knowledge of a flaw and what seems harmless to a user, damage can be done.

If anything, I'd say Windows users are a little better protected - not only do the browsers try and pick up on stuff (like phishing or fake sites), but they are also probably running Anti-Virus software and have a reasonable firewall in place - something which is rare on Mac OS X or Linux.

Edited by daveoc64
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I just looked on my computer and there are settings and log files for utilities I have never even turned on!
    • O&O ShutUp10 3.1.1104 by Razvan Serea O&O ShutUp10 offers a simple yet effective way to take control of your Windows privacy. It provides access to almost 50 privacy-related tweaks, most of them hidden or not easily accessible to the average computer users. Using a very simple interface, you decide how Windows 10/11 should respect your privacy by deciding which unwanted functions should be deactivated. Using ShutUp10 you can easily disable Windows Defender, turn off telemetry, disable peer-to-peer updates, turn off Wi-Fi Sense, disable automatic Windows updates, turn off and reset Cortana and more. ShutUp10 allows you to create a System Restore point before you apply any changes, so that you can revert your system at any time if you run into problems. O&O ShutUp10 is entirely free and does not have to be installed – it can be simply run directly and immediately on your PC. And it will not install or download retrospectively unwanted or unnecessary software, like so many other programs do these days! O&O ShutUp10 Free and Premium The latest version brings O&O ShutUp10 Premium, expanding the app’s long-standing privacy controls with automatic enforcement of user-defined settings. Instead of manually rechecking options after every Windows update, users can set their preferred privacy configuration once—or apply recommended settings in a single click—and the tool continuously monitors them in the background. If Windows 10 or 11 re-enables disabled features or introduces new data collection paths, Premium restores the chosen settings automatically without user intervention. The free version remains available and fully functional for manual adjustments, offering the same core privacy controls for Windows. However, the Premium tier is aimed at users who want long-term, hands-off protection, adding automatic reapplication after updates, ongoing monitoring, and optional notifications to ensure privacy settings remain consistent over time. O&O ShutUp10 3.1.1104 changelog: Added “Show Differences” button in the overview panel “Don’t show again” option for the restore point prompt Ctrl+F keyboard shortcut for search/filter functionality Detection and linking of system-wide and user-specific setting associations Automatic search while typing PREM: Option to preserve notification counters and timestamps across application restarts PREM: Reset blocked settings button in the Settings dialog PREM: Informational message when no settings are blocked PREM: Update check can also be triggered from the menu PREM: Notification deduplication and activity log summary feature Improved L005 “Disable Windows Location Service”: Version-specific split (up to Windows 11 23H2) and new variant for Windows 11 24H2+ L001 (Disable Location): Added Night Light warning to the description in all languages Search now detects setting IDs even when ID display is disabled and offers to enable it Detection and removal of Copilot/AI desktop apps in RecallTerminator Optimized High DPI support PREM: Reset button is now only enabled when blocked items exist – setting IDs are shown in the confirmation dialog PREM: Updated tray icons with higher-resolution versions PREM: Activity Log timestamps now use localized date and time formats PREM: Tray icon status now uses OK/Warning indicators and localized tooltips PREM: Recall folder detection switched to service-based detection PREM: Copilot uninstallation now provides UI feedback and improved verification Fixed Description text was not displayed correctly for the last item and disappeared when clicking the scrollbar Crash when clicking a search result heading or the […] button PREM: Installation path is now correctly preserved during upgrades PREM: Tray icon was not reliably removed when exiting the application PREM: Main window was not displayed correctly in single-instance mode PREM: Incorrect display of the & symbol in tray icon tooltips on Windows 10 PREM: Fixed notification flooding after sleep/standby PREM: Dashboard was not refreshed after applying recommended settings during onboarding PREM: Progress bar was not reset after deleting Recall folders PREM: Fixed service startup failures PREM: Fixed incorrect drift detection when Automatic Protection was disabled PREM: Notifications now correctly count all deviating settings when protection is enabled PREM: Registration Wizard was shown after sleep/standby despite a valid license Download: O&O ShutUp10 3.1.1104 | 76.4 MB (Freeware) Download: O&O ShutUp10 32-bit | ARM64 View: O&O ShutUp10 Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Fascinating...W h i t e P o w e r is now also asterisks out.  
    • In the past few days I have noticed two odd moderation activities. First, when I posted the term 'White Nationist Christian' it was asterisk's out. When I changed it to **** it was allowed! Second, in the Politics is a ###business thread I was allowed to post that the GOP is a party of p e d ophiles but I was censored  when I posted the GOP are a party of p e d ophile protectors. Wtf Neowin. Please explain.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      547
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      165
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      66
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!