Macbook Hacked in 2 Minutes!


Recommended Posts

Macbook (MacbookAir) got hacked withing 2 minutes!! :-)

Source: From Macworld

(http://www.macworld.com/article/132733/2008/03/hack.html)

Where: Security Conference open (http://cansecwest.com/post/2008-03-20.21:33:00.CanSecWest_PWN2OWN_2008)

:-D

Prize he won: 3 laptops (Sony Vaio, Fujitsu U810 and the MacBook ) + US$10,000

Edited by guruparan
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/628158-macbook-hacked-in-2-minutes/
Share on other sites

OMG a computer got hacked when the hacker was actually at the computer, im so in trouble from hackers /sarcasm

Nobody was able to hack into the systems on the first day of the contest when contestants were only allowed to attack the computers over the network, but on Thursday the rules were relaxed so that attackers could direct contest organizers using the computers to do things like visit Web sites or open e-mail messages

ha.

so did he pick the macbook? :p

OMG a computer got hacked when the hacker was actually at the computer, im so in trouble from hackers /sarcasm

read the article....he wasnt on the computer, he took control of it by "tricking" someone into going to a certain webpage, which has a malicious script on it, and gives him control of the hosts computer.

directed people to go to a site, instructing somebody is about the same as actually doing it personally.

thats like ariving at somebodys door saying your from their bank and telling them to go to www.whatever.tv and having them enter their bank information to confirm they are who they say they are

directed people to go to a site, instructing somebody is about the same as actually doing it personally.

thats like ariving at somebodys door saying your from their bank and telling them to go to www.whatever.tv and having them enter their bank information to confirm they are who they say they are

You fail. Most sites tailored for specific countries start with two letters, for example, us.abc.com, i'm sure it would be simple to have someone click a link going to usa.abc.com which is controlled by the hacker who then gains access to your computer, not that hard and the person doing the clicking probably didn't suspect a thing.

directed people to go to a site, instructing somebody is about the same as actually doing it personally.

thats like ariving at somebodys door saying your from their bank and telling them to go to www.whatever.tv and having them enter their bank information to confirm they are who they say they are

No, you can get someone to go to a site by a maliciously placed link at a number of places (like a youtube video or something) or an email.

Honestly. OS X sux0rs. I bet my IE 7 with UAC protected mode wouldn't fall for something like this, lol.

Now all those snob Mac users can weep with their false brainwashed statements. IT just goes to show you no OS even LINUX is safe from hackers. Just use COMMON SENSE when computing and don't tell me the Average Joe crap because he'd even hang himself trying to follow common sense.

there is a track history that proves that it would, especially since the hacker would have directed the operator to allow it

I bet my IE 7 with UAC protected mode wouldn't fall for something like this, lol.
directed people to go to a site, instructing somebody is about the same as actually doing it personally.

thats like ariving at somebodys door saying your from their bank and telling them to go to www.whatever.tv and having them enter their bank information to confirm they are who they say they are

No, that's like saying, "hey, check this new blog out at blog.whatever.tv" and it's not a blog, but a site that serves a maliciously crafted page.

the .tv was not serious, i didnt actually mean the country

and besides

Except for reserved names like .com.tv, .net.tv, .org.tv and others, any person in the world can register a .tv domain for a fee. In 2000, Tuvalu negotiated a contract leasing its Internet domain name ".tv" for $50 million in royalties over a 12-year period
You fail. Most sites tailored for specific countries start with two letters, for example, us.abc.com, i'm sure it would be simple to have someone click a link going to usa.abc.com which is controlled by the hacker who then gains access to your computer, not that hard and the person doing the clicking probably didn't suspect a thing.

and besides even that, this is not the least bit worrying

You fail. Most sites tailored for specific countries start with two letters, for example, us.abc.com, i'm sure it would be simple to have someone click a link going to usa.abc.com which is controlled by the hacker who then gains access to your computer, not that hard and the person doing the clicking probably didn't suspect a thing.

The way domain names work is like a hierarchy. the part all the way to the right of the domain name is the top level, and the part all the way to the left is at the bottom. So in the example us.abc.com, com is at the top, and us is at the bottom.

com

|

abc

/ | \

jp us uk

So, in order for someone to create the domain usa.abc.com, they would have to gain control over the abc domain. If someone were to gain control over the abc domain, they could cause a lot more damage than just creating a new URL to trick people.

Now all those snob Mac users can weep with their false brainwashed statements. IT just goes to show you no OS even LINUX is safe from hackers. Just use COMMON SENSE when computing and don't tell me the Average Joe crap because he'd even hang himself trying to follow common sense.

Only reason its said that OS X/Linux users are safer from hackers than windows users, is because the amount of people that use windows and dont have a clue what they are doing with a computer, thus makin them a easy target for hackers

The way domain names work is like a hierarchy. the part all the way to the right of the domain name is the top level, and the part all the way to the left is at the bottom. So in the example us.abc.com, com is at the top, and us is at the bottom.

com

|

abc

/ | \

jp us uk

So, in order for someone to create the domain usa.abc.com, they would have to gain control over the abc domain. If someone were to gain control over the abc domain, they could cause a lot more damage than just creating a new URL to trick people.

I understand how domains are formed, i was commenting in regards to copycat/phishing sites where the goal is to look exactly like a legit site. In my example, a hacker could take that a step further and create a domain that looks very similar to the legit site.

I'm glad this has come out.

I'd rather that other Mac users woke up and realised that we AREN'T magically protected by Mac OS X and that given the knowledge of a flaw and what seems harmless to a user, damage can be done.

If anything, I'd say Windows users are a little better protected - not only do the browsers try and pick up on stuff (like phishing or fake sites), but they are also probably running Anti-Virus software and have a reasonable firewall in place - something which is rare on Mac OS X or Linux.

Edited by daveoc64
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!