Generals Specs?


Recommended Posts

this is from fileplanet

The Sneak Peek was the Multiplayer Test created in November 2002, so it not optimized and does not reflect the final retail product. To run the Sneak Peak, you MUST meet the following requirements:

- 2 Gigahertz CPU minimum

- 512 MB RAM minimum

- GeForce4, or more recent Direct3D-capable video card

These system requirements do not reflect the final system requirements for the retail game, but will be necessary to operate the Sneak Peek since it is using unoptimized code.

--------Minimum Requirements for Enlistment--------

OS- Windows 98/2000/ME/XP

Processor - 2.0 Gigahertz or Faster CPU

Memory - 512 MB RAM

Hard Drive - 1.8 GB

CD-DVD - 4 SPEED

Graphics – GeForce4 of more recent Direct3D-Capable Video Card

3D Accelerator - Direct3D* (Required)

DirectX - Version 8.1

Network - TCP/IP compliant (2-8 Players)

Internet - 56.6Kbps (2-4 Players)

Internet - Broadband (5-8 Players)

Input - Keyboard, Mouse

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/62870-generals-specs/#findComment-639724
Share on other sites

It ran perfectly on my system:

AthlonXP 1900+ @ ~1.5ghz

Radeon 8500 64mb DDR

256mb 2100 DDR RAM

You can only run it on one resolution, which is 800*600, so the game looked like crap on my LCD monitor with a higher native res.

Just download it and run it with the sandbox and test it out for yourself. It's a pretty good game, and i intend on buying it when it comes out.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/62870-generals-specs/#findComment-639774
Share on other sites

Dude, I have the Multi-Player on 2 machines at my house. And, BOTH, work fine. One is my dual P3 1.26 and the other is my little P3 733. It runs fine on both. 2 Ghz, bah! And you can install it on lower than specified machines. The multi-player install has checkboxes. If you check 'em you can install it.So, if unoptomized, Generals runs fine on my P3 733 then I don't think anyone has anything to worry about. :cool:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/62870-generals-specs/#findComment-640675
Share on other sites

Well of course it takes a lot of power to run this game, think of the stuff it has to do. It has to do all the AI for ALL the individual units, rendering the scenes, explosions, sound and all the other stuff that is done off the focus area. Just pop a new CPU into your mobo, they are so cheap now anyways.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/62870-generals-specs/#findComment-640723
Share on other sites

Dazzla, the 800x600 limit is only in the beta. In the final version, you'll be able to chose almost any resolution.

And as for the specs I posted, and the ones on FilePlanet, the minimum specs I posted are for the retail release of the game. The specs that're listed on FilePlanet are only for the beta, and even those are overkill. They just want to make it clear that the beta might not run decently on anything lower then 2GHz, even though in most cases it'll run just fine. I ran it once on my old Duron 1gig rig, and it ran decently, although only at low detail levels.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/62870-generals-specs/#findComment-640800
Share on other sites

axis Posted on Feb 3 2003, 11:13

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well of course it takes a lot of power to run this game, think of the stuff it has to do. It has to do all the AI for ALL the individual units, rendering the scenes, explosions, sound and all the other stuff that is done off the focus area. Just pop a new CPU into your mobo, they are so cheap now anyways. 

Ok, the way to make a game run better is very simple. Get hardware that can handle the different processes and free up your proc. Graphics Cards are already doing that. Um, sound? Let's see get yourself an Audigy 2 and it'll lighten the load on your proc as well. Yes, a faster proc is always better, but they aren't as cheap as some would say. I mean I just got my 2 P3 1.26 Ghz Procs with the 512KB Cache and man, they were still, with my company discount, $164/proc. I can understand the need for a better proc in most cases because do to the fact that this game is one of the first to be able to do the Cinematic Computing Mumbo Jumbo that Nvidia has been touting, but even with that in hand, I still belive that a 700Mhz will do for a final code release of Generals. The reason I belive this? Very simple, WC3 came out and it has alot of graphical operations in it, but it's minimum sys req. was I think a 450? Maybe a little less or more. But then you get UT2K3, it needed a minimum 733 Mhz. Again, with that game, my little P3 733 was playing on a graphical and performance lvl higher than what you would have thought. Now, maybe that's just because I know how to configure my rig, but still. I'm sure that a machine with a 700 Mhz proc will handle it. I mean come on read my post above. I got my 733 Mhz P3 running the online Multiplayer Demo and it said it needed a minimum proc ok 2 Ghz! I do belive that I trashed those specs. Granted when I start the game up, the title screen comes up with a box that says my system does not meet the requirements but all I have to do is click ok and the rest is play time. My lod times are about 2 seconds behind everyone else online in the game. Which tells me that maybe some other people are playing on not so efficient machines or on machines like me. But regardless, I really think everyone is getting worked up for no reason. :)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/62870-generals-specs/#findComment-641049
Share on other sites

Gees Unreal Tournament runs pretty well on my Mates comp and hes only got a PIII 1GHZ, GeForce3, and it runs pretty reasoable

this game Looks like it requres about 1/3 the power that UT2003 does. Im willing to bet 1/10th my credibility that this game is moooore then playable on a 1GHZ system, with a geForce 2.

Cant wait for its release but.

Is it Feb 13th/?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/62870-generals-specs/#findComment-654804
Share on other sites

this game Looks like it requres about 1/3 the power that UT2003 does. Im willing to bet 1/10th my credibility that this game is moooore then playable on a 1GHZ system, with a geForce 2.

Is it Feb 13th/?

no way in hell this game could be playable with a geforce 2 no matter what processor speed...

the thing lags somewhat (when ya have a huge army) with a 2.6 533fsb and rdram and a ti4200

I want a 9700

but no Generals is supposed to be in stores Tuesday the 11th

where is Splinter Cell? :p

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/62870-generals-specs/#findComment-654879
Share on other sites

Ok, I'll try to be a little helpful here:

The minimum required system specifications to run Command & Conquer Generals is as follows:

? OS: Windows XP/ME/2000/98 (Windows 95/NT not supported)

? CPU: 800 MHz Intel Pentium III or AMD Athlon processor

? RAM: 128 MB

? CD/DVD-Rom Speed: 8x

? Hard Drive Space: 1.8 GB free hard disk space plus space for saved games, Windows swap-file, and DirectX 8.1

? Video: 32 MB AGP video card using the Nvidia GeForce 2, ATI Radeon 7500, or more recent chipset with DirectX 8.1 compatible driver

? Sound: DirectX 8.1 compatible PCI 16-bit sound card

? Input: Keyboard, Mouse

Additionally, the following specifications are required for multiplayer:

? 256 MB RAM for 3-8 players

? One set of game discs per player. Disc 1 and Disc 2 cannot be used simultaneously for multiplayer games.

? Internet (2-4 players): 56Kbps or faster direct Internet connection

? Internet (5-8 players): Cable, DSL, or a faster direct Internet connection

? Network (2-8 players): TCP/IP compliant network

Recommended system specifications:

? CPU: 1.8 GHz or faster Intel Pentium IV or AMD Athlon processor

? RAM: 256 MB or more

? Video: Nvidia GeForce3 or better Direct3D capable video card

Note: Some PCs equipped with the VIA KT133a chipset might encounter problems with Command & Conquer Generals.

Hope this helps.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/62870-generals-specs/#findComment-656325
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft updates Visual Studio Code with chat cost tracking and multi-agent chats by Paul Hill Microsoft has just launched Visual Studio Code 1.126, its latest weekly release. This time, the company has focused on letting you see the total cost of chat sessions to spot expensive conversations; enabling multiple chats per session that run side-by-side in one agent host Copilot session; and letting you browse new folders safely in restricted mode. We have now reached the stage where free AI in IDEs is coming to an end. To help you keep track of your costs, VS Code now lets you see the entire cost of a chat session, rather than just individual turns. This should give you more transparency about which sessions consume the most credits, so you can better manage your usage over time and spend less. For those of you using the Agents window, you know it is possible to run and manage multiple agent sessions at once. In this update, a Copilot session started from an agent host can hold several chats at once. Explaining how this feature works, Microsoft writes: Finally, from this update forward, Microsoft will remove the pop-up when opening an untrusted folder. When you open a new folder now, it will automatically open in Restricted Mode. You will see a banner that lets you manage the trust level of the folder. Microsoft has made this change so that it’s easier to start inspecting code without giving it trust right away. If you have VS Code, you can check for updates within the app now to get this new version. Otherwise, you can download it from the Visual Studio Code website.
    • Anthropic accuses Alibaba of using 25,000 fake accounts to copy Claude's capabilities by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic has accused Alibaba of using nearly 25,000 fraudulent accounts to extract capabilities from Claude on a huge scale. According to a report from Reuters, Anthropic told US lawmakers that operators linked to Alibaba and the company’s Qwen AI team generated 28.8 million exchanges with Claude between April 22 and June 5, 2026. That is a lot of Claude conversations, but Anthropic says this was not ordinary chatbot use. The company believes the accounts were part of a coordinated effort to collect answers that could help train or improve rival AI systems. The alleged campaign reportedly focused on some of Claude’s most valuable skills, including software development, multi-step reasoning, and agentic tasks. In practical terms, that means getting an AI model to plan and complete work across several stages rather than simply answering a single question. This is called 'distillation,' where AI companies use outputs from a larger model to train a smaller and cheaper one. The smaller model learns to imitate useful parts of the more capable system without needing the same amount of computing power. The distillation process isn't automatically suspicious, but the problem comes when one company gathers another provider's outputs without permission and at an industrial scale. Also, this does not mean Alibaba obtained Claude’s source code, model weights, or original training data. Instead, Anthropic claims the accounts repeatedly asked Claude carefully designed questions and collected the answers. Those answers could then be used as training material for another model. Anthropic has made similar accusations against DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax earlier this year. As Neowin previously reported, Anthropic said those three companies collectively generated more than 16 million Claude exchanges through roughly 24,000 accounts. Anthropic says the new campaign produced almost twice as many exchanges in a matter of weeks. Anthropic reportedly told lawmakers that the campaign could help Chinese AI developers approach the capabilities of its Mythos Preview model. Mythos is focused on advanced cybersecurity work, including finding and exploiting complex software vulnerabilities. via Reuters | Photo via DepositPhotos.com
    • An Indian manufacturer that assembles roughly one-third of Apple's iPhones and supplies semiconductor components to Tesla confirmed Monday that attackers had stolen and publicly published a 630-gigabyte cache of confidential files — including engineering blueprints stamped "TRADE SECRET," a 52-page quality inspection document for iPhone circuit board components, and cryptographic certificates that security experts say could be weaponized in follow-on attacks. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/319019/20260624/apple-tesla-supplier-tata-electronics-confirms-630-gb-data-theft-iphone-specs-dark-web.htm
    • I don't think it was ever a big question. In fact, I don't think anyone ever asked about how clocks work on Mars.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      176
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      133
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!