Almost all the code I've seen until now uses the following style for curly braces:
void swap(int &a, int &b)
{
int temp = a;
a = b;
b = temp;
}
Visual Studio also defaults to this. However I have read Code Complete 2nd edition and Steve McConnell argues against this style. "Avoid unindented being-end pairs (...) Although this approach looks fine, it (...) doesn't show the logical structure of the code. Used this way, the begin and end aren't part of the control construct, but they aren't part of the statements after it either." Steve McConnell recommends using the pure block style, which emulates Visual Basic (where there's no curly braces):
void swap(int &a, int &b) {
int temp = a;
a = b;
b = temp;
}
or this (begin-end block boundaries):
void swap(int &a, int &b)
{
int temp = a;
a = b;
b = temp;
}
Although I tend to agree with McConnell's reasoning, all the books I read, the classes I attended, and Visual Studio, use the first style, so I find it a bit weird. What do you think?
I think you will find it has been well documented across multiple media platforms the many reasons for the fall of destiny which supports the reasons i give above, my opinion is that is what caused the most damage to the company as they stopped being a gaming company and pushed a political narrative, look how damaging the dei road was for bud light, stocks crashed multiple resignations and job losses over a box ticking exercise, when decisions are made not to better something but to instead box tick and deliver something that the vast majority didnt ask for then you will get kick back and it normally has a massive financial impact
I did that to a work colleague many years ago when he left it logged in. Unfortunately I was out of the office the next day, and even the IT department was stumped lol. Got a bit of a bollocking when I got back into the office, but, by god, it was worth it.
Question
Andre S. Veteran
Almost all the code I've seen until now uses the following style for curly braces:
void swap(int &a, int &b) { int temp = a; a = b; b = temp; }Visual Studio also defaults to this. However I have read Code Complete 2nd edition and Steve McConnell argues against this style. "Avoid unindented being-end pairs (...) Although this approach looks fine, it (...) doesn't show the logical structure of the code. Used this way, the begin and end aren't part of the control construct, but they aren't part of the statements after it either." Steve McConnell recommends using the pure block style, which emulates Visual Basic (where there's no curly braces):
void swap(int &a, int &b) { int temp = a; a = b; b = temp; }or this (begin-end block boundaries):
void swap(int &a, int &b) { int temp = a; a = b; b = temp; }Although I tend to agree with McConnell's reasoning, all the books I read, the classes I attended, and Visual Studio, use the first style, so I find it a bit weird. What do you think?
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/630296-curly-braces-placement-and-indentation/Share on other sites
63 answers to this question
Recommended Posts