Recommended Posts

I'm liking what I see, but I reserve my judgement when the product comes out and I see how well it performs. That said, I prefered the ATi Catalyst drivers rather than Nvidia's Forceware as they simply worked as they should. Nvidia really need to do something with the plethora of drivers that they have at the moment, as it is tiring just to find which one runs the best on your system.

Scirwode

Well ATI cards always seemed to have better specs than nVidia cards, but the latter seems to perform better than what the specs indicate.
True in the case of R600/G80, but hardly a generality. In fact before the R600 ATI was consistently outperforming NVIDIA, since the Radeon 9000 days in fact. Radeon 9000 killed geforce FX, Radeon X100 slightly better than geforce 6, and X1000 still slightly better than geforce 7. And the HD 3000 are doing pretty well especially for the power consumption. So I have some good hopes for the HD 4000 although I don't think ATI is minded on outperforming the geforce 9 altogether.

My only real grudge against ATI is the lack of proper pillarbox support in the drivers. NVIDIA has buggy support for pillarboxing, but at least the support exists.

...

Sorry that's what I really meant, I guess I should have clarified. I only noticed in recent generations of video cards that the specs show these overwhelming amount of transistors, all these shaders etc. But benchmarks have been all but slightly disappointing :(

Sorry that's what I really meant, I guess I should have clarified. I only noticed in recent generations of video cards that the specs show these overwhelming amount of transistors, all these shaders etc. But benchmarks have been all but slightly disappointing :(

Yeah I definitely see what you mean, I mean look at the specs of the 2900XT for example, 512 bit memory, insanely fast clock speeds, lots of shaders, and it got spanked by most of nvidias cards.

TG Daily has a new article up with many details on the RV770 core. They talk about clockspeeds (Radeon HD 4870 still on-track to be world's first GPU with 1GHz+ core, apparently), TMU count (32 in RV770, so that rumor really looks likely to be true), memory amount and types (256MB GDDR3 ones for OEMs, but 512MB and 1GB GDDR5 versions for retail), among other things.

Pillarboxing works fine on my ATi HD2600.
Is it the monitor or the driver that does it? If it is the driver can I see a screenshot of the ATI control panel where you have that option? Because I've seen much discussion about pillarboxing at widescreengamingforum.com and apparently there's no real support for widescreen with ATI drivers. If you're lucky your monitor will do it automatically but it doesn't work for everyone. But maybe ATI has finally added it in a recent version, I don't know. If so I might seriously consider an ATI card next time. I simply ruled them out of my possibilities when I learned about non-existent pillarbox support. (besides at the time there wasn't anything competing with the 8800 GTS 320MB at its price point :happy: )
TG Daily has a new article up with many details on the RV770 core. They talk about clockspeeds (Radeon HD 4870 still on-track to be world's first GPU with 1GHz+ core, apparently), TMU count (32 in RV770, so that rumor really looks likely to be true), memory amount and types (256MB GDDR3 ones for OEMs, but 512MB and 1GB GDDR5 versions for retail), among other things.

May? That's earlier than I expected. AMD is really on to something with 115 to 141 GB/s with a 256-bit memory controller.

  • 4 weeks later...

These final specs for the Radeon HD 4850 and 4870 look very legit, and I personally think this is what we will be looking at come June 16th (official launch date):

Radeon HD 4870 | 16 ROPs | 32 TMUs | 480 SPs | 850MHz Core, 1050MHz SP | 1GB GDDR5 @ 1935MHz (3870MHz Effective)

- $349 USD

Radeon HD 4850 | 16 ROPs | 32 TMUs | 480 SPs | 625MHz Core, 825MHz SP | 512MB GDDR3 @ 1143MHz (2286MHz Effective)

- $249 USD

Source, Picture

Is it the monitor or the driver that does it? If it is the driver can I see a screenshot of the ATI control panel where you have that option? Because I've seen much discussion about pillarboxing at widescreengamingforum.com and apparently there's no real support for widescreen with ATI drivers. If you're lucky your monitor will do it automatically but it doesn't work for everyone. But maybe ATI has finally added it in a recent version, I don't know. If so I might seriously consider an ATI card next time. I simply ruled them out of my possibilities when I learned about non-existent pillarbox support. (besides at the time there wasn't anything competing with the 8800 GTS 320MB at its price point :happy: )

atihy4.th.png

They only added driver support for pillarboxing a few months ago.

Can somebody fill me in because my question still is unanswered. With Nvidia's upcoming line in June/July, won't that just destroy these two new cards from ATI that everybody has been waiting for?

In comparison, I know these two new cards blow away Nvidia's current 9800 GX2, but have they publicly talked about a response to what everybody knows is coming?

Any specs on NVIDIA's next line?

At any rate I am quite excited with ATI's new line. If that early benchmark is any sign of its real performance, then it would be the first major leap since the geforce 8, which now goes back more than a year and a half (november 2006!).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      522
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!