• 0

[JAVA] Replacing a text in a text file.


Question

Hi guys, I have another problem at hand now hope you guys can help me.

I have a text file as shown below.

  Quote
Mark:123:Red

Paul:746:Yellow

Ginger:447:Blue

I have a method to read in the text file and print out the line accoding to the user name.

eg. if user name is Paul, i will print out "PAUL:746:YELLOW".

Now I will like to edit YELLOW to ORANGE and then put it back to the text file in the same line.

it SHOULD look like this.

  Quote
Mark:123:Red

Paul:746:Orange

Ginger:447:Blue

The only solution i can think of is using a temp file to copy it over. Is there any other faster implementation or better ones ?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/630880-java-replacing-a-text-in-a-text-file/
Share on other sites

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I'm new at Java, so shoot me if it's wrong but it's just an idea I would use.. 'ReadFile' to read the txt file, BufferedReader to go over the lines, add the lines to some sort of a Collection or just String[]. Then go over that Collection/ String[] again with a for each or something then use the replace/replaceAll() methods of String and eventually write every line back with FileOutputStream. (The last two, string replace / write output can be combined since you'll need to go over every line again anyway to write it out.

Hope it helps a bit :)

  • 0

Read into memory, make changes, write back to disk.

You'll find that there are no advantages to doing it in-place on the disk. In fact, reading bytes (as in single characters) from a disk is a great deal slower than reading a lot more... reading clusters at a time which varies from format to format but is certainly a lot more than thousands of characters at a time.

In the context of an academic exercise like this... they probably want you to use the java File classes and/maybe StringTokenizer... :)

Enjoy!

  • 0

Try something like this (I just wrote it in the reply box, it's untested):

try {
	BufferedReader in = new BufferedReader(new FileReader("in.txt"));
	PrintWriter out = new PrintWriter(new File("out.txt"));

	String line; //a line in the file
	String params[]; //holds the name:number:color parameters of each line

	while ((line = in.readLine()) != null) {
		params = line.split(":", 3); //split the line into the 3 parameters seperated by :
		if (params[0] == "Paul" && params[1] == "746") { //find the line we want to replace
			out.println(params[0] + ":" + params[1] + ":" + "Orange"); //output the new line
		} else {
			out.println(line); //if it's not the line, just output it as-is
		}
	}

	in.close();
	out.flush();
	out.close();
} catch (Exception e) {
	e.printStackTrace();
}

  • 0
  Poolius said:
Can you use logical equals (==) on string types in Java now? I thought you had to use .equals() as == checked memory references? I realise I'm being a bit trivial, the code kindly provided appears pretty sound :) .

No, you still should be using .equals()

Might work, but "best practices"...

  • 0

Oh sorry, lol :fun:

try {
	BufferedReader in = new BufferedReader(new FileReader("in.txt"));
	PrintWriter out = new PrintWriter(new File("out.txt"));

	String line; //a line in the file
	String params[]; //holds the name:number:color parameters of each line

	while ((line = in.readLine()) != null) {
		params = line.split(":", 3); //split the line into the 3 parameters seperated by :
		if ("Paul".equals(params[0]) && "746".equals(params[1])) { //find the line we want to replace
			out.println(params[0] + ":" + params[1] + ":" + "Orange"); //output the new line
		} else {
			out.println(line); //if it's not the line, just output it as-is
		}
	}

	in.close();
	out.flush();
	out.close();
} catch (Exception e) {
	e.printStackTrace();
}

PS, when you use "literal".equals(stringObj), you won't get a runtime error if stringObj is null (unlike stringObj.equals("literal")).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • About that Trump's mobile 🤣🤣🤣  
    • AliExpress faces EU crackdown, makes promises to fight illegal products by Paul Hill The European Commission has taken two significant actions against the Chinese online marketplace AliExpress under the Digital Services Act (DSA) in a bid to enhance user and consumer safety online. The first action was to get AliExpress to commit to several legally binding commitments to address issues related to advertising and recommender systems. The second action was the publication of preliminary findings which found that AliExpress had breached obligations regarding the spread of illegal products. AliExpress can now respond to the Commission but if the broken rules are confirmed then AliExpress can expect to be fined. The Digital Services Act is a new tool that the EU has to regulate large online platforms. It aims to level the business playing field, protect fundamental rights of users, create a safer digital space, and improve transparency from businesses. AliExpress's pledges: More transparency, safer shopping As part of the pledges made by AliExpress, it will do more to monitor and detect illegal products such as medicines, food supplements, and adult material propagated through hidden links and affiliate programs. To help flag illegal items, AliExpress has promised to improve its notice and action mechanism. Other pledges include enhancements to the internal complaint handling system; more transparency for advertising and recommender systems; better traceability of traders on the platform; and improved data access for researchers. By implementing these rules, the European Commission hopes it can make AliExpress safer for registered and non-registered users by limiting the exposure to illegal content. Deep dive into AliExpress's alleged failures With regards to the preliminary findings, the Commission found that AliExpress had underestimated the risks because it had not allocated enough resources to moderation systems for illegal products. It also found that the company had failed to consistently enforce its penalty policy against those publishing illegal content. The Commission also discovered systemic failures in AliExpress’s proactive content moderation systems that allowed malicious traders to continue to operate or start operating on the platform. AliExpress is designated as a Very Large Online Platform (VLOP) which means it has to meet certain standards set out by the EU. The aforementioned violations are against the quality of operation that the EU expects from VLOPs. The company now has the right to defend itself against the EC’s findings, it can examine the documents and reply in writing, but if the findings are confirmed, AliExpress could face fines and be required to submit an action plan.
    • Author/Neowin... The title is incorrect and misleading... By the official blog post, it's not "indefinitely". There's a clear statement that development continues with a few specific target areas, and a new release date TBD and announced later. If it is later announced to be cancelled or delayed indefinitely, that's another story.
    • I hate Microsoft. My parents almost lost all drive content. As senior citizens they are unable to follow constant "improvements" Microsoft is dropping on its users. My mother's laptop is normally unlocked with a PIN. It is unexplicable for non-It person, that there is some cloud mictosoft account, that has a different password than the Pin and user ID is e-mail, but not necessarily normal Gmail addree, and even if the person knows this email address the password is not the password used for this email account. Just too much of twists. Suddenly her laptop ordered entering "decryption key" before booting. It was miracle we managed to guess email address associated with the PC that was used for Microsoft account. She would had lost everything on the drive. Why are they doing this? Privacy may be important for some people, but data loss is much more important for most of the people.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      xuxlix earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      Tomek Święcicki earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      carlitin86 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Reacting Well
      Peterlll06 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Peterlll06 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      674
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      283
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      225
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      192
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      145
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!