A few questions on LAMP Servers


Recommended Posts

Hey all, i'm going to be setting up a LAMP server in the office primarily for network storage, hosting a very small site and some small file transfers via FTP. The server will also be headless so it'll need a decent VNC server app running.

My main question is what distro of Linux should I run on the server? Ubuntu Server or Debian. I was attracted to Ubuntu Server because of it's promise of being able to setup the LAMP directly from the installer, yet Debian is more stable by design, at least thats my understanding.

I'll be using SMB for file transfers inside the network and i've some basic experience with setting that up but I was wondering if AFP is supported by either one of these distros and if anyone knows of any solutions I can use for this? as one or two people will be using Macs from time to time.

Next in line for questioning is what would you guys recommend I use as the VNC server? I've no experience with this so any links or advice you could offer in the VNC area would be great.

So to summarise,

Ubuntu Sever or Debian?

AFP Possible?

VNC server setup?

Thanks guys

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/630952-a-few-questions-on-lamp-servers/
Share on other sites

you will be carrying all your eggs in one basket seeing your plans of implementing this, putting vnc/file/smb server and lamp server separate is what I would (edit) NOT advise ,

Distro will be your own choice as you will be the admining it i suppose . any stable release will be good.

BTW Why do you want to put VNC if you are going to do SMB and FTP setup ? want to keep GUI running on a server? not advisable. (if you are handy with command line admining).

  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Recycle Bin bug across all versions of Windows by Usama Jawad A couple of days ago, we reported that the latest Patch Tuesday update has seemingly resulted in a lot of issues for many users, including OneDrive and Dropbox access problems, BitLocker recovery lockouts, and BSODs. Although Microsoft is yet to acknowledge these bugs, it has confirmed another, relatively smaller issue across all supported versions of Windows. In an update on its Windows Release Health Dashboard, Microsoft has confirmed that after installing June's Patch Tuesday update (KB5094126), you'll experience unexpected behavior when leveraging Recycle Bin. Basically, when you attempt to delete an item from the Recycle Bin, the confirm dialog will show you the internal file name of that content rather than the actual name. For example, the file may be named abc.png, but the confirm dialog will ask if you're sure that you want to permanently delete $Rxxxxx.png from the Recycle Bin. This is pretty much it for the scope of the bug itself; it just displays the wrong name in the confirm dialog. The correct name will be shown in the list view of the Recycle Bin and if you restore the file, it will return with the correct name as well. This issue affects pretty much all supported versions of Windows client and server, including: Client: Windows 11, version 26H1; Windows 11, version 25H2; Windows 11, version 24H2; Windows 11, version 23H2; Windows 10, version 22H2; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2021; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB 2016 Server: Windows Server 2025; Windows Server 2022; Windows Server 2019; Windows Server 2016; Windows Server 2012 R2; Windows Server 2012 As things currently stand, Microsoft is working on a concrete solution that will be released in a "future" Windows update. It remains to be seen if the firm will wait till the next Patch Tuesday or roll out an out-of-band (OOB) fix. The good news is that commercial customers can deploy a workaround right now, but they will have to reach out to Microsoft Support for Business for additional details.
    • They said by this time everyone will have flying cars. WELL...
    • A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. Maybe not as we now know that time can flow backwards.
    • Of course. Simply reverse the polarity.
    • It is clear from this aricle that "Time Is On My Side" no matter which direction it is flowing., https://noai.duckduckgo.com/?i...m%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DsEj8lUx0gwY
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      578
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      183
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!