Windows 98 on an XP Machine


Recommended Posts

Hi

I have some software that runs on windows98 and the pc it was on has died, so I have bought a PC with XP on and now want to install Windows 98 on it.

How should I go about it, I have tried a normal install and it tells me I need to install from the dos prompt, I have even made a dos floppy to boot from, when I key in E:\setup to get it to install W98 from in the CD in drive E, it is telling me that the drive E is an address that is invalid. Any ideas as to how I can get W98 installed on this machine and will it enable me to use a USB mouse?

Many thanks in advance to anyone that can help

Title Fixed

Edited by Barney
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/632774-windows-98-on-an-xp-machine/
Share on other sites

First, did you try using the software on XP? It's likely that it would work. If you did, and it didn't work, and still want to install 98, then you should try booting from the 98 CD. Assuming it is a legit CD, it should work and start the install.

I use a lot of older software in XP and have never had any problems running it actually. If it's something that relies on DOS like older games, you can download DosBox. You can also install the software and right click on it's icon and choose Properties then click on the Compatibility tab at the top and check the box next to "Run this program in compatibility mode for:" and choose Windows 98 in the menu.

If you really want to run Windows 98 then try this:

Create a Windows 98 bootdisk. You can download the image file for one here. Just put a floppy in and run the image file and it'll do it for you. You can also se if the Windows 98 CD will boot at start up and start it from there.

Boot using the floppy you just made

At the prompt type "format c:" without the quotes and hit Enter

When the format is done, restart the system leaving the floppy disk in and choose CD-Rom support at the menu

At the A:\ prompt type E:\setup

It should start the setup fine after that. Keep in mind that Windows 98 doesn't support more than 512mb's of RAM and most of your hardware may not have Windows 98 drivers. You can also run it in a virtual machine and still have XP on your system.

Man, this is proper oldschool - I don't know whether I could find the resources to get this working, but I'll try for you. Basically as I recall, trying to get Windows to install from a Dos Boot Disk will require you to load a basic CD driver so that it can mount and read from the CD Drive. As I recall, if you look on the floppy you made, there should be two files called 'autoexec.bat', and config.sys - in one of these needs to go a reference to start the CD drivers.

If you want a quick fix though, the following website has images of bootdisks with CD driver support. Hope that helps!

In all honesty, I wouldn't even consider trying to install 98 on a modern computer due to the lack of driver support. It would be much easier, quicker, and more sensible, to run it in a Virtual Machine. The plus side to this is, if the computer ever failed for any reason all you have to do is copy TWO files over to another machine and it'll be back up an running without any trouble.

  • 3 months later...

What are the specs of the PC that you are trying to install Windows 98 on? A few years ago at the school I used to go to, they were still installing Windows 98 on some computers, and the computers had Pentium 4 CPUs. A bit nuts, but I guess what happened was that the school had a boatload of Windows 98 licenses and someone donated a boatload of new computers with no OS installed... lol

So anyway, what are your specs? (Include models/manufacturers if you can)

You could set up a Dual Boot, if you can get drivers for your hardware. If you are using an older PC, this should be easier to achieve.

Create a 30GB Partition for Win98 FAT (or less, but I wouldn't recommend more), and a second partition (NTFS) for Windows XP using the remainding space.

Install Windows 98 FIRST.

The really simple way of doing this would be to use Microsoft Virtual PC 2007 (free from MS website) and run it as a virtual machine.

Problem solved.

Trying to install Windows 98 on new hardware is just asking for trouble. As I've already stated above.

What are the specs of the PC that you are trying to install Windows 98 on? A few years ago at the school I used to go to, they were still installing Windows 98 on some computers, and the computers had Pentium 4 CPUs. A bit nuts, but I guess what happened was that the school had a boatload of Windows 98 licenses and someone donated a boatload of new computers with no OS installed... lol

So anyway, what are your specs? (Include models/manufacturers if you can)

The dude posted the thread in April, and hasn't posted back at all. Anywhere on Neowin.

I don't think that this thread had any life in it when you bumped it. :unsure:

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If only Windows would have a toggle switch named "Get the latest updates as soon as possible" inside Windows Update settings... But nah, let's hide the new stuff inside a controlled feature rollout, even if the user is explicitly asking for the new stuff as soon as possible.
    • After watching the Apple event earlier this week it is quite the contrast. Apple is going back and tweaking the code to make things more efficient in many areas of MacOS. Windows is boosting your electric build to hide their issues.
    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!