[Official] Age of Conan


Recommended Posts

Not enjoying it that much so far (It's not 'Wowing' me anyway). Only level 6, almost 7... The load times are pretty bad (when you enter a new section). The graphics are much better than WoW but hardly amazing, I don't like the artwork much.... They don't appear to warrant the huge gfx/cpu combo to make it run and look well (e.g. poorly optimized).

Has crashed a few times as well, once just after character creation, at the loading screen before the beach.

The voice acting is pretty good. Not sure I like the 'shield' system.. But I guess that makes the combat a little less boring.

Overall it lacks that polish that you expect as it's almost ready for the public.

It is a "stress test" beta so it's not the version the public will get.

Its pretty dang close considering the game is scheduled to release in like 16 days?

I agree with you imachip. I really expected this to be good enough to be the "wow killer" but I am very disappointed. I mean overall I give it a 7.5-8, but definately not going to quit wow over it. I mean it has some great aspects, like the pvp is great!! much better than wow's pvp to me, but the single player side, I don't like.

I really don't like the combat system at all, I was hoping it would be the "next big thing" but honestly if I wanted a combat system like that, I would go play streetfighter or Tekken or something. The graphics are great though when running Vista and DX10, but as imachip stated, no reason for it to be THAT much of a system hog for what it shows.

Overall I think AoC probably has enough to pull some old wow players over, but definately not enough to be the wow killer as we all hoped.

It is a "stress test" beta so it's not the version the public will get.

The game already went gold, which means the cd's are already packed and are waiting to be shipped. So if this isn't the game we're getting then for god's sake they will have to fix everything with large patches..... It's already a 12gb game and some are expecting 25gb for the polished copy.

I've noticed that it seems to run much better under Vista for me than XP. Not as much pure framerate but overall smoothness and level loading times. The game also seems to use more memory (2-300M) under Vista which I assume accounts for this.

I am liking the combo system the more I use it, especially as they get longer and mroe powerful. Makes anticipating the enemy's shields more rewarding.

The open beta is actually an older client. An official on the Conan boards was quoted in saying that the open beta used a client that was actually older than the PVP beta that happened a few weeks ago. The current version that is supposedly less laggy and less buggy. We shall see.

It takes forever to install this stuff.

to install? i've been in line to download the game client from fileplanet for the past 12 hours and i'm only #522 on the westcoast server!!

i can't even imagine how long it'll take to download the 12GB AFTER waiting litterally 20+ hours i'll have to wait to get to the front of the line. this is ridiculous. they need to start releasing this stuff in torrent form :angry: or at least let some partner sites have a direct download up

It takes forever to install this stuff.

Yeah, took me about 40-50 minutes to install this beast. That's worse than Gears of War was!

I predict massive failure in the future of this game. Age of Conan: Loading Adventures.

Age of Conan will do quite well actually. It has a built in fan base (there are many, many people who love the Conan universe and lore, as it is VERY deep). And while it may have bugs now, and take awhile to load new areas etc, that can all be ironed out in patches very easily. No MMORPG launch goes without a hitch (except LoTRO, GW and a couple others) really, so it isn't that unusual.

Well, unless they do something major to the client, I won't be able to run it on this PC. I am not kidding, I get 3 fps in most areas of the game. Everything is on low or off, and it's just unplayable.

If I ever get my uber rig in here, that's a different story, I'm sure I can max it out (in DX10 to boot) on that rig :D

Anyone else having a problem logging into the beta right now? I keep getting an error saying my password is incorrect :(

you're using the wrong client

http://vnboards.ign.com/age_of_conan_techn...3/107188052/p1/

How does the fighting style work and everything... I heard some things. Like you move your mouse and what ever direction it moves is where the sword swings and stuff.

kinda. it's real time fighting so if you attack and then turn your character around then you'll attack which ever direction you're facing. you can choose to attack at diagonal angles as well because people with sheilds get to choose which direction they want to block from

i just cant get over the combat system. having the 1,2,3 keys bound to basic swings makes it F'n hard to get to all the combos. and there are ALL kinds of combos! if they revamped the control system and how it pertains to combat i would seriously consider this game.

graphics are nice, however the atmosphere seems lacking, and i cant put my finger on why. its odd, the graphics are far superior to WoW in every way. the lighting, the high polygon models, the shaders, everything. but for what ever reason, it just does not have the same imersive feel as wow. which is crazy, really, because ive always thoughts WoW's graphics where sub-par, regardless of their EXTREMELY talented artists.

The closest thing I can compare the combat system to is Marrowind's Oblivion, with more options/steps. You do have the ability to select a target but there is no auto attack. You have to choose which type of attack you want to use for each swing, over head (straight forward), swing left or swing right. Different combos require different swings.

The graphics are better than wow but not as good as EQ2's. (this is speaking from experiencing the PVP weekend). 5 more days and I can download the actual game and start playing.

I don't think out of the gate it will be wow killer but give it some time, it has the potential to put a dent into blizzards money farming ways.

graphics are nice, however the atmosphere seems lacking, and i cant put my finger on why. its odd, the graphics are far superior to WoW in every way. the lighting, the high polygon models, the shaders, everything. but for what ever reason, it just does not have the same imersive feel as wow. which is crazy, really, because ive always thoughts WoW's graphics where sub-par, regardless of their EXTREMELY talented artists.

WoW seems to be more....socially oriented. a few big open cities that everyone flocks too

i've only gotten to lvl 13 so far but i see none of that in AoC. the cities are massive and very "busy" looking. i just think there's too much going on, BUT this game has a tone of lore behind it so you can't really tone it down

oh and the graphics are "dark". i like bright, shiny, open spaces. but it seems the more realistic games try to look the more dark they end up being. just not my kind of game i guess. oh well, i'm just playing this beta as i wait for the Darkfall beta to come out :happy:

The closest thing I can compare the combat system to is Marrowind's Oblivion, with more options/steps. You do have the ability to select a target but there is no auto attack. You have to choose which type of attack you want to use for each swing, over head (straight forward), swing left or swing right. Different combos require different swings.

The graphics are better than wow but not as good as EQ2's. (this is speaking from experiencing the PVP weekend). 5 more days and I can download the actual game and start playing.

I don't think out of the gate it will be wow killer but give it some time, it has the potential to put a dent into blizzards money farming ways.

i would much prefer an oblivion style combat system where left click is attack and right click is block. this way all my number keys can be assosiated with special abilities and items.

on the note of hotbars, only being able to have one horizontal bar frustrates me. having to hold a function key to expose the second is not to my liking.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon Prime Day 2026: Best Dolby soundbar deals from Sony, Samsung, JBL, Polk, and more by Sayan Sen Yesterday we covered the JBL BAR 800 which is a 5.1.2 Dolby Atmos/Vision soundbar. The unit is on sale for its lowest ever price of just $800 making it a solid offer. However, there are many more options to choose from and in this article, we have made a compilation of the best deals including from Sony, Polk, Yamaha, Denon, Samsung and more. Sony's BAR models are currently at their lowest prices which makes them solid offerings. The company's BRAVIA Theatre Bar lineup is designed to suit different home cinema needs. The Bar 5 is an entry-level 3.1-channel soundbar with a wireless subwoofer, supporting Dolby Atmos®, DTS:X, S-Force PRO Front Surround, and Vertical Surround Engine for immersive audio with clear dialogue. The Bar 6 upgrades to a 3.1.2-channel configuration by adding dedicated up-firing speakers for more convincing overhead Atmos effects while retaining the wireless subwoofer. At the premium end, the Bar 7, Bar 8, and flagship Bar 9 are single-soundbar solutions featuring Sony’s 360 Spatial Sound Mapping technology, which creates phantom speakers for a wider surround field. Bar 7 includes nine speaker units, Bar 8 increases this to eleven, and Bar 9 offers thirteen speaker driver units promising the most expansive soundstage and acoustic performance. All models should integrate seamlessly with compatible BRAVIA TVs and support the BRAVIA Connect app for setup and control. Get them at the links below: Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 9 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $998.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $1498) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 8 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $798.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 7 Soundbar (HT-A7100): $618.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $768) Sony BRAVIA Theater System 6: $548.00 | Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 6: $448.00 Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 5 (HT-B500): $278.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $348) Sony HT-S400 2.1 soundbar: $198.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $248) Aside from those, we also have more discounts including from Samsung, Polk Audio, and more: Samsung Q-Series Soundbar HW-QS90H 7.1.2: $797.99 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Polk Audio Signa S4: $336.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $449) Hisense AX3120Q: $229.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $259) Check out more soundbar deals that you may like at this link. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!