[Official] Age of Conan


Recommended Posts

Haha, yeah, definitely. It's a very fun game.

My main is an assassin (named Niko, nonetheless :p). Definitely a lot of fun. My other character that I played the most at first is a necromancer, and that was a lot of fun as well.

I'm a necro for my main. I got my Conq to 26.. and got bored to tears with him.

I deleted, and remade my main into the aformentioned necro..

He's 14 right now... 1-12 was extremely rough because of how squishy mages are.. necros pets don't also, hold any agro.

However, 13 and 14 have been remarkable, partly because I think I'm finally begining to understand how my toon operates.

At 20, I get a new summon.. a Corruptor. Looking forward to it.

There's also a huge rumor going around that says that Necros, coming up in the new patch, will be able to summon ALL their pets by 20, and just has to learn which ones are right in the right time.

Call me excited by that.

*rawr* ... im in a really bad position at the moment, me and my mates all used to play wow, there is 4 of us. Just resently 2 of them have moved into playing AoC, and the other one is playing wow still. Im wondering if its really worth going to AoC.. Could you please help me and list some pro's and con's towards AoC over wow.

#1 Pro: Combat that you're actually involved in. There's no auto attack where you choose some special moves every once in a while; you choose each and every move you make.

#2 Pro: Tons of stuff to do. I've done zero grinding so far, though my highest guy is only level 28. However, I haven't heard of anybody else having to grind to get through stuff.

#3 Pro: The quests are generally very fun and varied. Very few things in this game make me feel like I don't want to do them, whereas there were so many quests in WoW where the only fun part was getting the XP.

Cons: 0 (for me at least)

Good question guy on the other page and excellent response giga, moe pros and cons would be call from other playas. At the moment im considering going to AoC and canning the Wow Subscription. I am presently bored with WoW and playing around in a new universe could be fun but I would expect to be back to WOW when WoTLK comes out. ah dilemmas...

Standard MMO rate, ja.

Much more entertaining exploration is one of the big ones that has hit me so far. Especially since in WoW, the world was such a painstakingly created 'character'. Not to mention the whole instancing/seemless world debate. I haven't had this much fun just walking around since Morrowind. The quest locations on the map seems to help the flow as well, even though it does dumb it down from a certain perspective. Besides, most WoW'ers just have Thott open anyway and just keep alt-tabing for coords.

Oh yea, and triple fatalities.(Y)

The quests definitely drop off when you hit your 50s and 60s. I'm 53 at the moment, and grinding has become a way of life unfortunately. Thankfully an instance run or two can help you get through a level, but at higher levels this game expects you to invest time in grinding as there just aren't enough quests post-50. This is not a criticism of the game, I'm totally enjoying myself (10x more fun than WoW), just a heads up for you guys still considering AoC.

Started yesterday. Currently have a LvL 16 Guardian. Usually I play mages but after my one or two week stint on WoW I had too much downtime for mana so as a change I've gone the melee tank type. Enjoying it so far.

If anyones interested, I'm on Bloodspire (PvP) using the name "Smigit"

LvL 22 Guardian now and just left the Tortaige levels then. I must say I'm enjoying it alot and since my character has alot less downtime that the mage I started out with in WoW the game seems more free flowing so far fo me.

Some issues I've read about that may be problematic later on have become a bit apparent but. Firstly I think the control schemes for melee classes could prove problematic in PVP scenarios. The whole having to enter a button combo in to do special moves, while not too bad an idea, means you have a long lead in time to making the combo execute. At the same time while executing the combos as far as I have seen you are unable to move. While this is fine for PvE where mobs will rush you anyway and stay still, I can see this being very problematic for melee classes come PvP combat. I know personally that of the few PvP fights I have had only one did I even attempt combo moves in because other than that the characters were running around far too much for me to really effectively execute them. Instead it sort of turned into a circle staff contest using normal moves.

I like the whole, swing to do a move, but I think I would prefer to see the intermedia moves in a combo done automatically after a single swing and then give the player the ability to move while doing the combo. I just cant see them being effective in PvP unless you can get a knockdown or stun move off as noone will stay still.

My other issue is the implementation of Stamina and how running scales to your level so that regardless of how much stamina you have you always run the same distance be it level 1 or level 20. Maybe not an issue for magic users, but for melee users whos moves are fed off their stamina its dumb that running 50m will basically render you unable to perform combos because you burnt up 3/4 of your stamina bar in that 50m run. magic users get a seperate bar, either melee users should too or mage users should use the same "stamina" bar to draw in their mana. Well i think the ultimate fix is just don't scale stamina expenditure with levels, let high level people actually run for a long distance if they wish too.

Besides those gripes I'm really enjoying it.

Hrmmm kinda not impressed... 5 hours later and still downloading patches at 20kbs latest one being 1.4GB. If I am not playing this game tomorrow night or theres an error with the patching im gonna get my cash back come hell or high water.

Hrmmm kinda not impressed... 5 hours later and still downloading patches at 20kbs latest one being 1.4GB. If I am not playing this game tomorrow night or theres an error with the patching im gonna get my cash back come hell or high water.

1.4Gb i dont even think all the patches put together come close to that size? There is one 600mb patch, i think 3 100mb patches and a couple <50mb :huh:

how running scales to your level so that regardless of how much stamina you have you always run the same distance be it level 1 or level 20. Maybe not an issue for magic users, but for melee users whos moves are fed off their stamina its dumb that running 50m will basically render you unable to perform combos because you burnt up 3/4 of your stamina bar in that 50m run.

Sprint length is talent, not purely level dependant. The problem is that melee has a lot more stamina so it takes longer to recharge an equal percentage compared to casters. Still, I think the strength of the casters here is more enjoyable to the dps equalizations that only hurt casters in wow. Casters are primarily masters of CC, not damage. If you let melee not have to trade something its less enjoyable for all imo.

Which zone was bland and why?

Edited by Dashel

It finished download overnight, quickly logged in this morning, have to say it has redeemed itself. With no real tweaks to performance beyond setting to high it seems to run and look pretty good. Shadows are fubar'd though. My character came out looking like a tranny though, be back to the drawing board and settling in for a good play tonignt.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The laptop in the bedroom is an Acer with i7-10510U CPU. Acer's website states they will not be upgrading it so I had little choice other than disable secure boot. I know next to nothing on these matters so hopefully it will be fine.
    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!