[Review] 24 inch iMac 2.8ghz


Recommended Posts

imac1.jpg

Click for larger images...

imac2_tn.jpg imac3_tn.jpg imac4_tn.jpg

As many of you know the iMac line was refreshed on Monday, April 28. For about 6 months I had been wanting to purchase a new computer, but I kept holding off for some reason. When I heard the rumors about the iMac update, I made up my mind that I would finally purchase one.

By the way, this is not my first Apple computer. I have had a 14? (1.33ghz) iBook for years now. I knew what to expect in terms of the initial setup of the iMac based off of my previous experience with Apple products. And I also knew my way around OSX pretty well.

I ordered the iMac the day it was updated. I don't game on my computer anymore (I have a 360, Wii, and PS3) so I figured I would go with the lower end of the 24? models. I selected the free shipping so I wasn't expecting to receive the iMac for about a week, but to my surprise it was delivered to my house on Wednesday, April 30...not even 2 full days after I placed my order. I was pretty happy with that to say the least.

My initial thought when I saw the box was, wow that's going to be huge. And believe me, I was right with my initial assessment.

I figured a 24? monitor wouldn't seem much different from the 20? monitor I was used to using with my Dell computer. I was completely wrong. The screen on the 24? iMac is totally amazing. I have never seen a display with a brighter screen. Even my 32? Samsung LCD television looks pale in comparison to the screen of this iMac. The glossy screen has a lot to do with that though. But anyways, the hardest thing to get used to, for me at least, is the resolution of the screen. 1920x1200 is amazing to work with. So much can be done on the screen at once. It is a great upgrade over the 1680x1050 resolution I am used to working with.

As for the computer itself, it came with a 2.8ghz Core 2 Duo and 2gb of 800mhz ram which I upgraded to 4gb (more on that later). This was a nice upgrade for me considering the pc I use at home is a 3.6ghz P4. My computer at work is a 1.83ghz Core 2 Duo though, so when I talk about responsiveness I will be comparing the iMac to that.

For me, this computer is extremely quick. I almost forgot how much quicker OSX in general is at launching applications. In terms of overall responsiveness there is no comparison between the iMac and my computer at work. Safari opens instantly...iTunes, even with a 10,000 song library opens in a fraction of the time that it does on my other computers. It takes a little under 2 seconds to be exact. Photoshop launches quicker than I have ever seen. I could go on and on, but I'm sure you get the general idea.

As for the ram upgrade, it really couldn't be any easier. It took maybe 2 minutes total to replace the ram with 2 new sticks. As far as I can tell, it is definitely best to max out the ram if you have the money to do so. At one point yesterday I saw I had a little over 800mb of ram free. I would have definitely noticed a performance hit if I had only been using 2gb.

This is my first time using Leopard for an extended period of time. A couple of my friends have iMacs (I talked them into buying them) so I have used it before, but not to the same extent as I have the past few days. I like the changes they have made for the most part. But just like anything else, there are a few default settings here and there that don't make much sense to me. For example the Mighty Mouse doesn't have right clicking enabled by default. Photo booth doesn't have the auto flip image setting enabled. Simple things like that can be slightly annoying to have to change, but like I said, it's impossible to please everyone completely. And the things I mentioned are very minor.

I ran xbench to include some figures in the review.

Please note though that I did not run the program right after a reboot, only because I haven't restarted the computer since I initially set it up and downloaded all the updates.

So here are the scores...

All tests enabled: 176.11

HDD test disabled: 228.84

Overall, I am very happy with my purchase. I hope this iMac lasts me a long time.

The only thing I dislike about the whole package is the Mighty Mouse. I just don't like it at all.

So here are some overall ratings.

iMac screen: 9.5/10

iMac performance: 9/10 (there is always something faster)

Overall look: 9/10 (people are amazed at this thing sitting on my desk)

Initial Leopard Impression: 9/10

Mighty Mouse: 6/10

Apple Keyboard: 8/10 (it takes some time to get used to)

Please ask any/all questions you may have about it and I will go into more detail.

Edited by StevoFC
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/634969-review-24-inch-imac-28ghz/
Share on other sites

Congratulations on your purchase, and great review. I have to agree with your criticism of the 'Mighty Mouse' - it is sub-optimal. I'd suggest using your PC mouse with the iMac.

/me pats his Logitech MX 1000

iMac is a really great all in one computer, I have one myself a 20" version from 07aug update (bought it 3 months ago) and can't be more pleased about it.

BTW what's your Power supply 1 temp in iStat (taken after couple of hours of general usage please)? Mine seems to be idling at 75C at general usage times and tops at 83C when really maxing out the computer.

iMac is a really great all in one computer, I have one myself a 20" version from 07aug update (bought it 3 months ago) and can't be more pleased about it.

BTW what's your Power supply 1 temp in iStat (taken after couple of hours of general usage please)? Mine seems to be idling at 75C at general usage times and tops at 83C when really maxing out the computer.

power supply is 60C.

it fluctuates a lot though.

edit: even if you just turn off the screen itself (control + shift + eject) it drops temps a ton.

for example i left my computer for about 25 minutes and the temp is now 45C for the power supply.

3 pics added to the first post...

Edited by StevoFC

I also agree on the Mighty mouse. It plain sucks.

There's some rumors that they will change the mouse soon, but I don't expect something much more ergonomical from them. Their mice were NEVER ergonomical.

Anyway, the only real problem I have with Apple is with mice. Otherwise, I also enjoy my 1st gen 24 inch imac :p

Welcome to the club lol

power supply is 60C.

it fluctuates a lot though.

edit: even if you just turn off the screen itself (control + shift + eject) it drops temps a ton.

for example i left my computer for about 25 minutes and the temp is now 45C for the power supply.

3 pics added to the first post...

Mine doesn't seem to fluctuate that much, it's stable around 75C pretty much all the time and turning the screen off hasn't ever changed the temp much. Currently the temp went from 75C to 73C and the hard drive was also turned to sleep for a 20min away time (it's a well ventilated room). Whatever the case I'm not really worried about it, but I just want to make sure my power supply isn't working abnormally compared to other iMac's with the same specs.

power supply is 60C.

it fluctuates a lot though.

edit: even if you just turn off the screen itself (control + shift + eject) it drops temps a ton.

for example i left my computer for about 25 minutes and the temp is now 45C for the power supply.

3 pics added to the first post...

Totally didn't know that Ctrl+Shift+^ turns off the screen. :| Thanks for that, and nice review. One question - does the glossy screen give off a lot of glare? I see the screen is facing away from the window, so does that help?

Totally didn't know that Ctrl+Shift+^ turns off the screen. :| Thanks for that, and nice review. One question - does the glossy screen give off a lot of glare? I see the screen is facing away from the window, so does that help?

When you sit directly in front of the screen it's not bad at all. Depending on your lighting and windows though there will be glare when looking at the screen from an angle. I have 2 windows in my room, one to the left also and sometimes it shines in but hasn't bothered me.

I forgot to point out that I have the brightness of the screen on notch 6 of 16 right now. It's crazy how bright it is. Sometimes I turn it up higher but after extended periods it actually bothers my eyes because it is so bright.

One question - does the glossy screen give off a lot of glare? I see the screen is facing away from the window, so does that help?

Yes, it does. I've got a 20" iMac with the glass front, and it reflects everything like a mirror. It's at the end of my bed, so when I read books at night with the light, I have to tilt the screen away so it doesnt reflect in my face. Can be a bit off-putting but the picture is definately better imo.

I own a 17" iMac as well, and I can say without a doubt that the 20" is far superior than the 17" (Screen-wise at least!)

When you sit directly in front of the screen it's not bad at all. Depending on your lighting and windows though there will be glare when looking at the screen from an angle. I have 2 windows in my room, one to the left also and sometimes it shines in but hasn't bothered me.

I forgot to point out that I have the brightness of the screen on notch 6 of 16 right now. It's crazy how bright it is. Sometimes I turn it up higher but after extended periods it actually bothers my eyes because it is so bright.

That's what I thought - it depends on on the lighting conditions since Raa's iMac can double as a mirror. :p

Yes, it does. I've got a 20" iMac with the glass front, and it reflects everything like a mirror. It's at the end of my bed, so when I read books at night with the light, I have to tilt the screen away so it doesnt reflect in my face. Can be a bit off-putting but the picture is definately better imo.

I own a 17" iMac as well, and I can say without a doubt that the 20" is far superior than the 17" (Screen-wise at least!)

Well it's good to know that the screen is better. I just wish Apple would have a matte option.

My friend just got his a few days ago also (he ordered it as soon as he got word of it, and it came here a couple of days later - and we're in Hawaii).

As a Windows user for more than 10 years, Apple computers are so freakin cool!

Now all you have to do is get one yourself. :cool:

For example the Mighty Mouse doesn't have right clicking enabled by default. Photo booth doesn't have the auto flip image setting enabled. Simple things like that can be slightly annoying to have to change, but like I said, it's impossible to please everyone completely. And the things I mentioned are very minor.

The Mighty Mouse is designed so that long time Mac users don't get confused by the right click, and can use it how it's always been. OS X is designed to not really need right click to keep things simple.

I think in Tiger auto flip was default, I remember using it and thinking it would irritate me a lot.

For me, I thought it was strange how tapping the trackpad didn't click by default, but when you watch an old/inexperienced person using a laptop and making lots of accidental clicks this way, it does make sense.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I am not a US citizen nor a Trump fan. Respect to both left and right. But I will, for the sake of fun, predict something for my own. There will come a day when the US and China will collide like titans ( over Taiwan or anything else ). Then, on that day, some people in this comment section will realize how good an idea it was to become independent in areas like that. ( Or atleast try )
    • Microsoft Edge gets tons of security features, including AI model that can see your screen by Usama Jawad Microsoft Edge may not be the most popular browser out there, but it does receive quite frequent updates that sometimes bring surprising new features and axe others that are not as popular. Now, Microsoft has detailed some of the new security enhancements that it has introduced in Edge for Business, typically used by commercial customers. Microsoft has emphasized that security features are baked into Edge for Business and offer native integration with security and governance tools like Defender and Purview. Browser sessions are governed by default on managed devices but can also be governed through dedicated work profiles on unmanaged devices. An important aspect in this area is controlling the use of shadow AI. We have talked about this before, but it essentially restricts employees from using unsanctioned AI apps through data loss prevention (DLP) policies, with Edge redirecting them to trusted AI services like Microsoft 365 Copilot. This feature, available as a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) license, ensures that confidential data never exits AI boundaries set by your organization in Purview. Additionally, Microsoft also has strong DLP policies for contractors. Contractors leveraging a Entra ID-joined work profile provisioned by their contracting company on a device managed by their actual employer can be restricted from downloading files locally. In such scenarios, the file is saved on the contracting firm's OneDrive rather than being downloaded locally. Another useful Edge security feature disallows copying and pasting from unmanaged locations and apps. Similarly, DLP policies can be configured at a granular level to restrict screenshots or downloading of files from certain locations. In the same vein, IT admins can block the installation of extensions, hosted apps, themes and scripts, and control if users can install extensions from external locations. They can also enable the installation of specific extensions and allow users to request access to certain extensions, so that they can be managed on a case-by-case basis. Finally, Edge for Business now has an on-device AI model that uses computer vision to see what's on your screen and block potentially malicious content immediately. This does not rely on site reputation, as it simply monitors what is being displayed on your screen, which means that it is effective against malicious content that takes over your screen and employs scareware tactics. Since this is an on-device AI model, it does use your system's resources, so it's enabled by default only on devices with at least 2GB of RAM and four CPU cores. You can find more details in the Microsoft Mechanics video here.
    • Could you come up with a slightly less depressing background for Tux instead of that gray gradient? Doesn't have to be cheerful, just less of a downer...
    • Linux 7.2's first release candidate gets off to a good start by Paul Hill Credit: Larry Ewing It has been a few weeks since the release of Linux 7.1, and in that time, the Linux 7.2 merge window has been open, where developers can submit their features and patches ready for the upcoming release. That window is now shut, and the release candidate phase has begun so that new features can be tested and further fixes applied. According to the founder of Linux, Linus Torvalds, this week’s release candidate looks “reasonably normal”. Although we are super early in the release candidates, this is a good sign as it makes it more likely that an eighth release candidate will not be needed. Torvalds even mentioned that the update’s stats are only larger than they really are because there was another AMD header drop with a third of the patch just being AMD GPU register definitions, which aren’t big changes but make the code contributed look larger overall. In addition to this, he noted that just over half the patch is drivers, even when excluding the AMD register dump. The rest of the changes are spread out over architecture updates, tooling, documentation, and core kernel updates. In the next week, Torvalds says that he will be chilling out, taking the week “mostly off”. Despite this, he will be reading emails and keeping up with things, so if he is slow responding, now you know why. He said he is hoping for a calm week, but we will just have to see if the second release candidate is actually like that. We should expect seven or eight release candidates before Linux 7.2 is released, so expect it around the end of August. If you missed it a few weeks ago, be sure to check out our coverage of Linux 7.1's release.
    • Ridiculous claim that the labor cost difference of $6000 annually would increase cost per phone by $200. The employees produce 3 phones per month or what?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Zeynel earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      JKR earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dedicated
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      248
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      86
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!