PS3 has outsold Xbox 360 in Europe


Recommended Posts

Holy crap! You sure you don't work for Sony Audio, because for a minute i thought you did with that reply.

I would love nothing better for Sony to bring out GREAT & EXCLUSIVE games for the PS3, aswell as get DS3 here in Europe and i have confidence that it WILL(not yet it's not) be a great platform BUT what he is saying is bull**** and you know it. If there was load of great games over XBOX360 then he would have a case and i wouldn't argue against it.

I don't think software can be opinionated on PS3 because at this present time it still doesnt have much and hardly any Exclusives either

No I don't work for Sony, but I support them as I've played and enjoyed each PS.

I'd love to work for them, especially SCEE and make them stop being so incompetent in comparison to SCEA. Bunch of idiots at times.

I just don't understand your mass hate in your posts (well I guess you can hate if you want, but it makes distasteful reading if you bring hate up in every thread you can wedge it in) - The PS3 has good games out just now and some exclusives you can't play anywhere else - Big deal if they aren't your taste, but others like them which is why the console sells.

The way you word some of your posts though it's as if you're talking for everyone, or trying to talk for everyone at least.

Not everyone will like the PS3, just in the same way people do like it - So parties from both sides have to understand that. It's sold well, even during an arguably weak year - So I don't really see how that could be spun negatively, hence my surprise at all this nonsense erupting - Well not "surprise" as such, it's the GH on NW, obviously if a piece of positive news is posted for any console it's taken on a ride through the swamps of hell by some.

Edited by Audioboxer
i think that the rrod its a big factor in which why many people are now prefering ps3 over xbox360, not every country got the warranty system that its offered in the US.

on the contrary, the UK has a legal minimum 1 year guarantee on everything (more or less). although I do think you're correct in that I'd expect the british people would expect the console to perform flawlessly, without the assumption that it'll eventually fail.

it always happens here :( There are alot of Sony haters/360 fanboys. Just have ignore them. Ignore feature is very useful then you cant see anything they post (Y)

Yeah, that is the main reason that I hardly post here (19 posts since June 2005). I do read the forums a lot at college though. :)

Edited by DARRKCLOUD
it always happens here :( There are alot of Sony haters/360 fanboys. Just have ignore them. Ignore feature is very useful then you cant see anything they post (Y)

Oh please. There are plenty of you PS3 fans that hate on the 360 over in that forum too. Don't single us out.

-Spenser

No I don't work for Sony, but I support them as I've played and enjoyed each PS.

I'd love to work for them, especially SCEE and make them stop being so incompetent in comparison to SCEA. Bunch of idiots at times.

I just don't understand your mass hate in your posts (well I guess you can hate if you want, but it makes distasteful reading if you bring hate up in every thread you can wedge it in) - The PS3 has good games out just now and some exclusives you can't play anywhere else - Big deal if they aren't your taste, but others like them which is why the console sells.

The way you word some of your posts though it's as if you're talking for everyone, or trying to talk for everyone at least.

You just seem very heavily one sided. I am not calling you anything of the sort, i want the PS3 to do well just like alot of people like you but i am sick to death of this Sony PR spreading lies and false promises. It not about if the games are not to my taste, alot of them are on XBOX360. The console sells/or has sold because of the Blu-ray capability. I mean work it out, since HD-DVD admitted defeat a lot of PS3s have sold in the last couple of months and people have brought them with no intension to play games on it just movies/or use Blu-ray as there primary usage.

I am talking for myself thanks. The same can be said for you and prehaps everyone else in here. This is my opinion. I really don't know what other people think, let them post in this thread and we will see.

I mean work it out, since HD-DVD admitted defeat a lot of PS3s have sold in the last couple of months and people have brought them with no intension to play games on it just movies/or use Blu-ray as there primary usage.

Why is that such a bad thing? sony wants to sell units, the public are happy with what they bought and its doing what they wanted it to do.

Wheres the loss?

You just seem very heavily one sided. I am not calling you anything of the sort, i want the PS3 to do well just like alot of people like you but i am sick to death of this Sony PR spreading lies and false promises. It not about if the games are not to my taste, alot of them are on XBOX360. The console sells/or has sold because of the Blu-ray capability. I mean work it out, since HD-DVD admitted defeat a lot of PS3s have sold in the last couple of months and people have brought them with no intension to play games on it just movies/or use Blu-ray as there primary usage.

I am talking for myself thanks. The same can be said for you and prehaps everyone else in here. This is my opinion. I really don't know what other people think, let them post in this thread and we will see.

I am more biased to one side than the other, a blind man reading this forum could tell you that. Everyone has their preferences.

It's only because of my gaming upbringing and where I've invested my money in previous generations. This generation however the 360 done enough to make me buy it, which has caused a shift in loyalty, however it's clearly not going to take all my loyalty away overnight and stop me liking the PS.

It not about if the games are not to my taste, alot of them are on XBOX360. The console sells/or has sold because of the Blu-ray capability. I mean work it out, since HD-DVD admitted defeat a lot of PS3s have sold in the last couple of months and people have brought them with no intension to play games on it just movies/or use Blu-ray as there primary usage.

It IS about games not to your taste, at least to the point of you coming in here and practically shredding the games library and saying BR pretty much done it all - Even neutrals will tell you that isn't true. BR helped, but so did the games.

No-one can post in this thread with any credibility and say the PS3 has no games, or hasn't sold any units due to games.

People invest for current games and future games. There is a decent collection of current games on the PS3 now, and as I said, it doesn't matter if it's multiplatform - A good game on your console, is a good game regardless.

Not everyone is in a situation where they can own two consoles, therefore a game being multiplatform aint gonna mean squat to them.

I am more biased to one side than the other, a blind man reading this forum could tell you that. Everyone has their preferences.

It's only because of my gaming upbringing and where I've invested my money in previous generations. This generation however the 360 done enough to make me buy it, which has caused a shift in loyalty, however it's clearly not going to take all my loyalty away overnight and stop me liking the PS.

It IS about games not to your taste, at least to the point of you coming in here and practically shredding the games library and saying BR pretty much done it all - Even neutrals will tell you that isn't true. BR helped, but so did the games.

No-one can post in this thread with any credibility and say the PS3 has no games, or hasn't sold any units due to games.

People invest for current games and future games. There is a decent collection of current games on the PS3 now, and as I said, it doesn't matter if it's multiplatform - A good game on your console, is a good game regardless.

Not everyone is in a situation where they can own two consoles, therefore a game being multiplatform aint gonna mean squat to them.

I am you're dark side :D

And eilegz

I think that?s a really sh*tty excuse for not buying a console, It?s like saying majority of marriages fails so I guess I am not going to marry ( : ( my family is forcing me too).

I had both my 360 and PS3 broken once, so you know what I did while waiting for the system to get repaired I went ahead and bought another so I don?t miss playing (both of them went out while waiting for a major game release).

All I am saying is that it?s good that Sony?s doing great in Europe, but that doesn?t mean that Microsoft is doing bad either.

All I am saying is that it’s good that Sony’s doing great in Europe, but that doesn’t mean that Microsoft is doing bad either.

Exactly! (Y)

But for some this console race is all about extremes, it's yes or no, like or hate - There is no middle ground.

Why bother writing it at all then, I might as well just say "Person X is a complete moron /jk ;)" and just because of that little bit at the end it immediately means nothing and is completely irrelevant.

Another question about this is - do you think it will stay this way from now on (with the PS3 on top in Europe) or will it chop and change throughout the year/s?

Another question about this is - do you think it will stay this way from now on (with the PS3 on top in Europe) or will it chop and change throughout the year/s?

With Sony hurling out MGS4 soon, I think it will stay this way for a while.

BR may play a part as well if adoption increases.

A price cut would help even more as well.

End of the year will be the biggest battle with the likes of LBP coming out, then GoW2 facing off against RFOM 2 and the ramp up to christmas for sales with bundles and maybe as I said above, price cuts.

I have a feeling it will bob and weave, if either console gets an exclusive title, it will probably affect sales, if Microsoft do decide to go with Bluray, it will bump 360 sales for a while - you can never tell what's around the corner with these things.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!