PS3 has outsold Xbox 360 in Europe


Recommended Posts

Why bother writing it at all then, I might as well just say "Person X is a complete moron /jk ;)" and just because of that little bit at the end it immediately means nothing and is completely irrelevant.

No idea, I didn't invent the rules. Its just the way it is.

I agree. The XBOX360 can be had for half the price and simply has better games

I bought a new HDTV and a PS3 to go with it - 360 never even came to the consideration because of its pitiful support for HDTVs (native 1080p), lack of a Bluray player and otherwise dismal controller - indeed, 360 has more and maybe even better games but as a multimedia entertainment device it's bending over for the PS3.

Who cares about the price when you can afford a huge ass TV anyway?

I bought a new HDTV and a PS3 to go with it - 360 never even came to the consideration because of its pitiful support for HDTVs (native 1080p), lack of a Bluray player and otherwise dismal controller - indeed, 360 has more and maybe even better games but as a multimedia entertainment device it's bending over for the PS3.

1 - AFAIK the 360 does support native 1080p. Very few games are actually in 1080p, but that is the same with the PS3 too.

2 - your right there

3 - Thats debatable. Personally I find the 360's pad much nicer than the PS3's.

I bought a new HDTV and a PS3 to go with it - 360 never even came to the consideration because of its pitiful support for HDTVs (native 1080p), lack of a Bluray player and otherwise dismal controller - indeed, 360 has more and maybe even better games but as a multimedia entertainment device it's bending over for the PS3.

Who cares about the price when you can afford a huge ass TV anyway?

I love it when you spread lies to make your console choice seem better...

- as has been said the 360 has full 1080p support, had it before the PS3 launched, and it may even have more 1080p native games(not sure about the numbers as they are right now)

- multimedia... well the 360 lets me play music frommy computr while playing, it's got a media center extendr, making it a true medi center, unlike the PS3.

- the controller, well again subjective, but yeah, most PS3 fans even admit the 360 controller is better to hold and use. It's also got neat acessories like the chatpad, that'll make the 360 the only true contender now as MMO's are entering the console market.

yes the 360 has more and better games, THAT's why I bought the 360 as my GAME console. if I wanted a blu ray player, I'd buy one. and it's hardly bending over to the PS3 as a media center, they're pretty much about equal. except for the inability to play blu-ray.

since you bring money into the equation and claim that you may as well go with the expensive console if you can afford a big scren TV. Well in that case, my HTPC with a DVB-C card and the abiity to pop in a blu-ray/HD-DVD player/burner makes the PS3 bend over and scream for mommy. and since I used my old PC parts for most of it, it's actually cheaper than the PS3 even, heck it even plays games pretty decently with my old GF7800GT.

So if you got the money and want a proper media center, the PS3 is not the way to go. I want my games console to be my games console and my media center to be what it does best, be a media center.

I bought a new HDTV and a PS3 to go with it - 360 never even came to the consideration because of its pitiful support for HDTVs (native 1080p), lack of a Bluray player and otherwise dismal controller - indeed, 360 has more and maybe even better games but as a multimedia entertainment device it's bending over for the PS3.

You are spreading FUD.

The XBOX360 has 1080p support with no issues and the XBOX360 has a better controller design than the aging 10 year old PS one.

This isn't about controllers, native resolutions or any of that. The news here is that the Playstation 3 has outsold its main competitor, despite the fact that it has been in the market for a full year and a half less. Despite the fact that it has been more expensive from the get-go, and plagued by an onslaught of (often unfounded) criticisms. I think this is a clear testament to the Playstation brand's strength, for one, and an indicator of something that is as obvious as it is ignored by members of this forum: we are not representative of the majority. Whether you think the Xbox 360's superiority is unquestionable or are appalled by rootkits, if you think the PS3 is just a trojan horse for Blu-Ray, if you think it's game library sucks, it still says nothing about what the general consumer believes.

Fanboys can duke it out as much as they like in these forums, but the reality is far different from their geeky perceptions of it. So instead of arguing back and forth with people who will probably disregard your opinion blindly anyways, something more productive (albeit harder to come up with) is to contribute to the topic by mentioning or things worth noting.

I think this news is surprising, even to the most ardently Sony-obsessed. Given the flack the Playstation received upon its release, and the fact that it was late to the game and overpriced to boot, I would've thought it'd take at least another years for sales figures to be comparable in Europe. It seems Xbox 360 is losing in two of the three main markets (Europe and Asia, the other being North America); do you guys think Sony will eventually catch up over there as well?

This isn't about controllers, native resolutions or any of that. The news here is that the Playstation 3 has outsold its main competitor, despite the fact that it has been in the market for a full year and a half less. Despite the fact that it has been more expensive from the get-go, and plagued by an onslaught of (often unfounded) criticisms. I think this is a clear testament to the Playstation brand's strength, for one, and an indicator of something that is as obvious as it is ignored by members of this forum: we are not representative of the majority. Whether you think the Xbox 360's superiority is unquestionable or are appalled by rootkits, if you think the PS3 is just a trojan horse for Blu-Ray, if you think it's game library sucks, it still says nothing about what the general consumer believes.

EXACTLY correct. One of the biggest things that people forget are the average consumers. We are not them. The average consumer doesn't usually even know what a Gigabyte is, let alone why the PS3 is different than the 360, other than NEW AND AWESOME HD PLAYER! The average consumer looks at a price tag and basic features and makes the decision pretty quickly. This is why the PS3 sold merely as a Blu Ray player and not a game machine.

Most of you may think I am wrong, but the average consumer will generally buy something that is more expensive assuming they get more for what they pay for. It also has the media standard on its side. If the 360 had integrated HD-DVD directly into the system, I doubt Blu-Ray would have won the format war and HD-DVD would still be in the fight right now. So thats two things it has that have nothing to do with gaming. The last thing it has is reputation. Sony was last generations leader in both amount of content/games and sales. They are still using that to influence their fans with promises of new games (of course, the games they promised took upwards of a year to be released or are STILL in developement... KZ2 I'm looking at you).

Selling points have nothing to do with what we arguing about in this thread. Price is a factor, but not really too big of one since both consoles are a relatively large investment. The only true difference is the PS3 plays to two markets while the 360 only plays to one.

^^^All your stuff holds true, until you factor in the part where, based on worldwide sales estimates, and these numbers for Europe, the Xbox 360 is outselling the PS3 about 2 to 1 in North America, the largest of the markets. You can't generalize all that stuff to the average consumer if it doesn't appear to hold true for even a majority of them.

If you're just generalizing to the average consumer in Europe, then you can go ahead and ignore this post.

-Spenser

BTW does anyone here know what is the official figure of hardware sold in the first place. I know last year both 360 and PS3 sold almost evenly with 250k +/- in europe (I am talking about march, I need the figure of what they sold up to date).

Why do you need it? :huh:

So the PS3 is killing the 360 in Japan and now winning in Europe. As far as I know they sales pace is about even in America at the moment and with none of PS3's big titles released yet, thats pretty good for being a year behind. I expect after MGS4, Gran Turismo, God Of War, Killzone, Final Fantasy, Little Big Planet, Home etc...drops the PS3 is going to leave the 360 in its dust.

:blink: ur kidding me right.

Umm, because it's always good to know by how much they are out selling with.

and ohh thanks spencer. (Y)

Sorry but that is rather pathetic. Good to know how much the 360 is outselling the PS3? Good in what way? For a start the figures are not even on a level playing field so are going to be in favour of the 360.

I see no reason, other that to spout fanboy rubbish that anybody would care for these figures to see how much its outselling the PS3.

If you have to discuss these slightly unbalanced figures, do it in the 360 forums.

^^^He asked a god**** question with no insinuation of fanboyishness. Back the hell off of him. The answer was easy enough to give without being a jerk.

-Spenser

His answer to why he wanted the figures reeked of fanboyism though, didn't it. That was what I was commenting on.

So before getting on your soap box I suggest you read the post first.

^^^All your stuff holds true, until you factor in the part where, based on worldwide sales estimates, and these numbers for Europe, the Xbox 360 is outselling the PS3 about 2 to 1 in North America, the largest of the markets. You can't generalize all that stuff to the average consumer if it doesn't appear to hold true for even a majority of them.

If you're just generalizing to the average consumer in Europe, then you can go ahead and ignore this post.

-Spenser

It is the home country. The original XB sold extremely well in the US despite being behind. Maybe it was because we had an american made console, similar to Sony/Nintendo love in Japan. I'm not sure why Americans are so more inclined to buy the 360 than foreigners, but from what I have seen most consumers think more money = higher quality.

I love it when you spread lies to make your console choice seem better...

Actually I have access to both so your point is moot.

multimedia... well the 360 lets me play music frommy computr while playing, it's got a media center extendr, making it a true medi center, unlike the PS3

Why would I want to have a computer running at the same time as playing my videos/movies/etc. Waste of electricity - I can get the job done with the PS3 alone and if I want a "real" media center, I can always install Linux on the PS3 which then blows away anything you can ever imagine to get on your 360.

the controller, well again subjective, but yeah, most PS3 fans even admit the 360 controller is better to hold and use.

Most, most and most. I think the net has taught people to conjure up statistics and opinions out of their butt - you don't know most PS3 users, you don't know most 360 users and you most definitely have no clue what those people think. So please spare us the "most people ding dang dong" this or that.

if I wanted a blu ray player, I'd buy one.

Not everyone has the same needs as you - many people out there are buying the PS3 because they want a single box that "does it all" - gaming and viewing movies. One of its greatest selling points in EU so far has been the fact that it's more of a media device than just a gaming console.

Well in that case, my HTPC with a DVB-C card and the abiity to pop in a blu-ray/HD-DVD player/burner makes the PS3 bend over and scream for mommy.

I can pop in Linux to PS3, insert a DVB-T/C/S USB dongle (Almost any USB will do - for example the Pinnacle E series DVB-T works right out of the bat with the LinuxTV.org's DVB stack) and run the system as a complete media center with DVR capabilities, Blu-Ray capabilities and as a full blown computer should I need to - all this in much nicer casing and for the most part smaller form factor than you'll ever be able to fit your HTPC into.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!