PS3 has outsold Xbox 360 in Europe


Recommended Posts

Xbox was better than PS2

and PS3 is better than XBOX360

(when you combine every single feature of a specific console)

end of discussion. Anyone saying something against this above statement has no idea about technology.

It is as clear as How ferrari is better car than porsche (only some duche porsche owners would say its better than ferrari because well they have a porsche instead of ferrari)

PS3 better than XBOX360 and of course it will sell more in Europe and Asia. But in USA people are obsessed with XBOX360

Xbox was better than PS2

and PS3 is better than XBOX360

(when you combine every single feature of a specific console)

end of discussion. Anyone saying something against this above statement has no idea about technology.

It is as clear as How ferrari is better car than porsche (only some duche porsche owners would say its better than ferrari because well they have a porsche instead of ferrari)

PS3 better than XBOX360 and of course it will sell more in Europe and Asia. But in USA people are obsessed with XBOX360

I don't think its quite that clear cut. I don't agree that either console is better than the other. In 2/3 years time we will more than likely see a difference as I honestly believe that the PS3 has lots more to untap than the 360 (and when developers stop using the 360 as lead platform) but at this point they are very comparable. Both have great exclusive and non exclusive games and any true gamer should own both.

I don't know how Sony manages to outsell 360 even after releasing a system with 12 month gap with the closest competitor. Also not having any good games for 6+ months after the system released, either he's shooting star or Europe has totally ******* gamers who don't know how to by a gaming system.

No offence but if you see a high prices, no good games and dust collecting console and you buy that thing it's pretty much clear your are a f**b** and nothing else. I do agree I have 2 PS3's myself but I like many other sane gamer bought after the prices was lowered and when they started releasing good games (Like Ninja Gaiden, GT5, etc).

I just don?t for out my money for any company because I used to like their product.

I have a PS3 and the ONLY reason it is collecting dust is due to the fact that I am moving around the country for 8 months and can't bring it with me.

Also who cares about what you think about the system, it is just what was stated about hardware sales not "does Neo003 agree taht its a good system?"

well...

bluray Games Console... no movie player

swappable harddisk yeah, so does the 360, with the difference that the average consumer an swap a 360 HDD.

wi-fi support yeah, so does the 360, with the difference that I can CHOOSE if I want a slow wireless network instead of a proper wired onefree PSN yeah, thast's what happens when it's not worth charging for. just wait untill the PSN becomes fully developed and they get to the point that fre vs Live isn't a selling point anymore.

some PS3 exclusive games but they are head to head with XBOX360 not sure what you're trying to say with this point.

much lower fail rate as well

well not if you count the falcon models that are for sale today, and then there's the whole 3 year warranty and all that.

PS3 is sure a better machine than 360...

No they're pretty much equal except the 360 has more good games for now.

looks better as well.

compeltely subjevtice and a wholeheartedly disagree, the PS3 is a chromed BBQ/toaster, and the bulging look isn't nearly as nice as the sleed inwards curves of the 360. and the 360 is white. 100 bonus points right there. the 360 also comes in a lot more color choices and custom paint jobs such as the Halo version. and more limited editions such as 300, GTA IV and some other movie and games customs.

well...

bluray Games Console... no movie player

swappable harddisk yeah, so does the 360, with the difference that the average consumer an swap a 360 HDD.

wi-fi support yeah, so does the 360, with the difference that I can CHOOSE if I want a slow wireless network instead of a proper wired onefree PSN yeah, thast's what happens when it's not worth charging for. just wait untill the PSN becomes fully developed and they get to the point that fre vs Live isn't a selling point anymore.

some PS3 exclusive games but they are head to head with XBOX360 not sure what you're trying to say with this point.

much lower fail rate as well

well not if you count the falcon models that are for sale today, and then there's the whole 3 year warranty and all that.

PS3 is sure a better machine than 360...

No they're pretty much equal except the 360 has more good games for now.

That is the worst come back post I've ever read.

That is the worst come back post I've ever read.

I noticed you took the time to point out why this is and back it up with good reasoning and all this,

intead of just dropping in a fanboy "you're wrong" comment... oh wait... :rolleyes:

well...

bluray Games Console... no movie player

swappable harddisk yeah, so does the 360, with the difference that the average consumer an swap a 360 HDD.

wi-fi support yeah, so does the 360, with the difference that I can CHOOSE if I want a slow wireless network instead of a proper wired onefree PSN yeah, thast's what happens when it's not worth charging for. just wait untill the PSN becomes fully developed and they get to the point that fre vs Live isn't a selling point anymore.

some PS3 exclusive games but they are head to head with XBOX360 not sure what you're trying to say with this point.

much lower fail rate as well

well not if you count the falcon models that are for sale today, and then there's the whole 3 year warranty and all that.

PS3 is sure a better machine than 360...

No they're pretty much equal except the 360 has more good games for now.

looks better as well.

compeltely subjevtice and a wholeheartedly disagree, the PS3 is a chromed BBQ/toaster, and the bulging look isn't nearly as nice as the sleed inwards curves of the 360. and the 360 is white. 100 bonus points right there. the 360 also comes in a lot more color choices and custom paint jobs such as the Halo version. and more limited editions such as 300, GTA IV and some other movie and games customs.

You're making yourself sound just as bad as Alfista.

I noticed you took the time to point out why this is and back it up with good reasoning and all this,

intead of just dropping in a fanboy "you're wrong" comment... oh wait... :rolleyes:

You need proof as to why thats a shocking come back? Then call me the fanboy?

Oh. Dear.

^^^You do need to give good reasoning when you say stuff like that, because, quite frankly, your comment is a load of **** as it is without any reasoning.

-Spenser

Funny how its only you two that require an explanation. Seems others see the angle I'm coming from.

If you believe what he posted, and are happy to accept it - fine. I'm not arguing with you. If you're happy with your blinkered view, I'm happy for you.

I gave a post with explanations of my points and why things are better or worse.

you go and say

"The PS3 Roxorz and the 360 i pure utter crap" (some exagaration may have occured)

and when we ask why, or for you to explain why my points aren't good enough, your comeback is

"I don't need to explain it, because it's just the truth and you guys are dumb"

Seriusly, do you not see the fault here, do you not realize you sound like the worst blindfolded Sony fanboy ever ?

honestly, and I don't mean this as an insult, I just want to know, how old are you ?

Funny how its only you two that require an explanation. Seems others see the angle I'm coming from.

If you believe what he posted, and are happy to accept it - fine. I'm not arguing with you. If you're happy with your blinkered view, I'm happy for you.

oh and by others, you apparently mean audioboxer, since h's the only one that's replied, and he didn't say he disagreed with my points, just that I may be overly defensive of the 360 :p

wich is good, with all the agreeing me and him have been doing in the piracy threads, I was worried the world was coming to and end soon :p

That's a big lol at this guy ^ :laugh:

Whatever happened to good ol' Neowinian discussion? :D

You cant discuss with people that won't listen. Its impossible. People have this image that the PS3 is a big bag of crap. I'm getting a little bored of telling people its not, so I thought I would just give in. Its easier, stops the thread getting locked because of a pathetic argument. I think you all know where I stand on the 'how good is the PS3' debate/

People are still throwing the 'PS3 has no games' line around! Its a joke.

If people want to think they have the best console and the PS3 can't touch it because it inferior in everyway, let 'em. They are missing out, not me.

You cant discuss with people that won't listen. Its impossible. People have this image that the PS3 is a big bag of crap. I'm getting a little bored of telling people its not, so I thought I would just give in. Its easier, stops the thread getting locked because of a pathetic argument. I think you all know where I stand on the 'how good is the PS3' debate/

People are still throwing the 'PS3 has no games' line around! Its a joke.

If people want to think they have the best console and the PS3 can't touch it because it inferior in everyway, let 'em. They are missing out, not me.

But that's the thing, we are all listening! The only difference is, we're replying with argumentative points and actual opinions. You don't seem to care to do that.

It's one thing to not want to get into a whole "PS3 does have games!" "Not really" "Yes it does!" circle of doom, but it's a completely different thing to reply to someones detailed post about very specific features of the 360 vs PS3 and say something like, "Valid points? Not really..." or whatever you said. You just can't do that, it doesn't provide anything for the discussion and makes you sound like a *gasp*fanboy*gasp*.

If you didn't think his points were valid, you had 2 options:

1 - Say so and explain why.

2 - Move on.

I'm sorry, but you're quickly gaining the reputation of someone seeing your name come up in a discussion and taking everything you say with some expected spin.

But that's the thing, we are all listening! The only difference is, we're replying with argumentative points and actual opinions. You don't seem to care to do that.

It's one thing to not want to get into a whole "PS3 does have games!" "Not really" "Yes it does!" circle of doom, but it's a completely different thing to reply to someones detailed post about very specific features of the 360 vs PS3 and say something like, "Valid points? Not really..." or whatever you said. You just can't do that, it doesn't provide anything for the discussion and makes you sound like a *gasp*fanboy*gasp*.

If you didn't think his points were valid, you had 2 options:

1 - Say so and explain why.

2 - Move on.

I'm sorry, but you're quickly gaining the reputation of someone seeing your name come up in a discussion and taking everything you say with some expected spin.

Fine, points taken.

I didn't realise this was a proper discussion board. From now on you will get my reasons behind my thinking - god help you all.

Haha, I chuckled. :laugh:

I'm looking forward to some interesting discussions I'm sure we'll have... :devil: :p

I've come from a rather fanboy full site and the normal one sentence replies usually sufficed. Seemed strange being called a fanboy when I own both a 360 and a PS3 (and play & enjoy them both). Hopefully this place will be better than that.

I've come from a rather fanboy full site and the normal one sentence replies usually sufficed. Seemed strange being called a fanboy when I own both a 360 and a PS3 (and play & enjoy them both). Hopefully this place will be better than that.

Nah, you'll still be called a fanboy. :p

I kid. :laugh:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!