Recommended Posts

Hey,

I've noticed, quite recently, that American don't really go for the xenon headlights. Boz has an Audi A6, almost fully loaded, but I fail to see those xenon lights. Also other people don't seem to really care about xenon in America.

Is there a reason for that? I've been driving with xenon headlights since they were released and actually, I would never switch back to normal headlights.

I'm just trying to start a small discussion about the subject.

Regards,

James

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/635893-americans-and-xenon/
Share on other sites

There was some initial shock and pushback because of the brightness of the headlights for oncoming traffic. I thought there was actually a push to have them banned. You can really notice when vehicles have them installed.

Is there a cost benefit (short-term/long-term) or an environmental advantage to them? Or is it just the fact that they are brighter that you like? I really don't know much about them, myself.

They hurt my eyes when coming towards me. so I don't mind they aren't the norm.

All the cars we currently own are equipped with HID lighting. I think some of the push-back about hurting people's eyes are aftermarket kits that were installed by enthusiasts without realigning their lights so that they are being focused higher than they should into peoples eyes.

Even standing directly in-front of one of our cars with the lights on they don't bother my eyes because the light is widely dispersed over the ground at my feet, not into my eyes.

That being said, even I am the victim of misaligned headlights while driving, HID or standard.

too many people have misaligned lights, dipped beams can be as bright as you want without glare as they should be pointing at the floor.

my experience is most americans do the aftermarket bodge-job. perhaps most manufacturers dont offer them standard due to the culture difference... i dont know. like chrome wheels? how many european cars come as standard with chrome? like, 3?

too many people have misaligned lights, dipped beams can be as bright as you want without glare as they should be pointing at the floor.

my experience is most americans do the aftermarket bodge-job. perhaps most manufacturers dont offer them standard due to the culture difference... i dont know. like chrome wheels? how many european cars come as standard with chrome? like, 3?

you can't really compare a usefull thing like HID lighting with flashy chrome wheel that server no real purpose. and I think in many parts of europe wich is farther north brighter ights is more of a necssity than in most of the US. though I'm not sure how common Xenons are on new cars here anyway, unless you choose them as an option package.

oh and btw, chrome wheels are horrible, ugly flashy things, plain non shiny alu wheels are much nicer :p Chrome asa whoe is much mmore of an american phenomenon too.

Nobody has them over here... because they are only on vehicles that cost a ton of money.

Then you've got the people with civics, huge trucks, etc doing aftermarket jobs that do them completely wrong to where they blind people when they are driving.

In Ohio now I believe its illegal to use xenon headlights if your car didn't come with them factory equipped. Nobody ever gets in trouble for it though.

I have them on an Audi A4. They make a big difference at night, it is hard to go back honestly. It has light sensors that dim them and aim them down when there is a car coming towards you, and it does work I've tested it by driving another car etc... One thing that is annoying though is they do not dim when there is a car in front of you, the mirrors reflect some godly light into your eyes. I keep a proper distance behind cars because of that (not that I shouldn't anyways) , but that cusion of safety and comfort I leave always means some jerk will cut in and slow down in front of me, so then it gives me comfort that they are being blinded.

I think aftermarket HID lights should be banned though. I am 90% sure that the ones i see around here, do not auto dim, they blind me to no end, it ****es me off.

(Ps. Sorry for the spelling mistake in the title)

You get used to those lights when you see a driver in the opposite direction. I have to no trouble whatsoever when someone crosses me and he has xenon lights. You don't directly look in the lights either, do you?

I just found it awkward that you hardly see them, factory installed, in America.

They exist mostly on luxury vehicles here in the states. I have them as I have an Acura TL but the problem is definitely aftermarket kits. These people blind oncoming motorists and those motorists tend to react, especially in a country where everyone is sue happy. It's not so much an issue though as it is more of an expensive option that most vehicles simply don't offer.

There seems to be a problem over here with people aiming their headlights incorrectly almost always too high. This seems to occur with all headlight types. HID's being most noticeable has created a backlash of sorts. It just seems strange that someone would spend the money on an aftermarket HID system and then not bother to aim it properly pretty much throwing away the advantage of better lights. Sorry bit of a rant there.

I have them on my Acura TL and the one on the passengers side went out. Turned out that there is some type of transformer that went. The cost to have one light fixed was over $1000.00. When the next one goes I am trading it in. (N)

And you paid that? Shoulda just replaced the ballast with a new one. Woulda cost about $100. These Honda/Acura dealerships just LOVE their customers because they know they can screw them over like that.

I have them on my Acura TL and the one on the passengers side went out. Turned out that there is some type of transformer that went. The cost to have one light fixed was over $1000.00. When the next one goes I am trading it in. (N)

That would be one of the few xenon headlights going. They are not only known for the extensive light they produce but also for their durability.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
    • Qwen 3.6 is better value per dollar, and you can run it locally for free.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!