Recommended Posts

Hey,

I've noticed, quite recently, that American don't really go for the xenon headlights. Boz has an Audi A6, almost fully loaded, but I fail to see those xenon lights. Also other people don't seem to really care about xenon in America.

Is there a reason for that? I've been driving with xenon headlights since they were released and actually, I would never switch back to normal headlights.

I'm just trying to start a small discussion about the subject.

Regards,

James

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/635893-americans-and-xenon/
Share on other sites

There was some initial shock and pushback because of the brightness of the headlights for oncoming traffic. I thought there was actually a push to have them banned. You can really notice when vehicles have them installed.

Is there a cost benefit (short-term/long-term) or an environmental advantage to them? Or is it just the fact that they are brighter that you like? I really don't know much about them, myself.

They hurt my eyes when coming towards me. so I don't mind they aren't the norm.

All the cars we currently own are equipped with HID lighting. I think some of the push-back about hurting people's eyes are aftermarket kits that were installed by enthusiasts without realigning their lights so that they are being focused higher than they should into peoples eyes.

Even standing directly in-front of one of our cars with the lights on they don't bother my eyes because the light is widely dispersed over the ground at my feet, not into my eyes.

That being said, even I am the victim of misaligned headlights while driving, HID or standard.

too many people have misaligned lights, dipped beams can be as bright as you want without glare as they should be pointing at the floor.

my experience is most americans do the aftermarket bodge-job. perhaps most manufacturers dont offer them standard due to the culture difference... i dont know. like chrome wheels? how many european cars come as standard with chrome? like, 3?

too many people have misaligned lights, dipped beams can be as bright as you want without glare as they should be pointing at the floor.

my experience is most americans do the aftermarket bodge-job. perhaps most manufacturers dont offer them standard due to the culture difference... i dont know. like chrome wheels? how many european cars come as standard with chrome? like, 3?

you can't really compare a usefull thing like HID lighting with flashy chrome wheel that server no real purpose. and I think in many parts of europe wich is farther north brighter ights is more of a necssity than in most of the US. though I'm not sure how common Xenons are on new cars here anyway, unless you choose them as an option package.

oh and btw, chrome wheels are horrible, ugly flashy things, plain non shiny alu wheels are much nicer :p Chrome asa whoe is much mmore of an american phenomenon too.

Nobody has them over here... because they are only on vehicles that cost a ton of money.

Then you've got the people with civics, huge trucks, etc doing aftermarket jobs that do them completely wrong to where they blind people when they are driving.

In Ohio now I believe its illegal to use xenon headlights if your car didn't come with them factory equipped. Nobody ever gets in trouble for it though.

I have them on an Audi A4. They make a big difference at night, it is hard to go back honestly. It has light sensors that dim them and aim them down when there is a car coming towards you, and it does work I've tested it by driving another car etc... One thing that is annoying though is they do not dim when there is a car in front of you, the mirrors reflect some godly light into your eyes. I keep a proper distance behind cars because of that (not that I shouldn't anyways) , but that cusion of safety and comfort I leave always means some jerk will cut in and slow down in front of me, so then it gives me comfort that they are being blinded.

I think aftermarket HID lights should be banned though. I am 90% sure that the ones i see around here, do not auto dim, they blind me to no end, it ****es me off.

(Ps. Sorry for the spelling mistake in the title)

You get used to those lights when you see a driver in the opposite direction. I have to no trouble whatsoever when someone crosses me and he has xenon lights. You don't directly look in the lights either, do you?

I just found it awkward that you hardly see them, factory installed, in America.

They exist mostly on luxury vehicles here in the states. I have them as I have an Acura TL but the problem is definitely aftermarket kits. These people blind oncoming motorists and those motorists tend to react, especially in a country where everyone is sue happy. It's not so much an issue though as it is more of an expensive option that most vehicles simply don't offer.

There seems to be a problem over here with people aiming their headlights incorrectly almost always too high. This seems to occur with all headlight types. HID's being most noticeable has created a backlash of sorts. It just seems strange that someone would spend the money on an aftermarket HID system and then not bother to aim it properly pretty much throwing away the advantage of better lights. Sorry bit of a rant there.

I have them on my Acura TL and the one on the passengers side went out. Turned out that there is some type of transformer that went. The cost to have one light fixed was over $1000.00. When the next one goes I am trading it in. (N)

And you paid that? Shoulda just replaced the ballast with a new one. Woulda cost about $100. These Honda/Acura dealerships just LOVE their customers because they know they can screw them over like that.

I have them on my Acura TL and the one on the passengers side went out. Turned out that there is some type of transformer that went. The cost to have one light fixed was over $1000.00. When the next one goes I am trading it in. (N)

That would be one of the few xenon headlights going. They are not only known for the extensive light they produce but also for their durability.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!