• 0

Frameset problems


Question

I have a client that is demanding the following in an intranet web application:

  • A list of documents on the left side of the screen, that is independently scrollable
  • A document (can be any format, they will have the necessary plug-ins installed) that is select and displayed on the right
  • The list and the document must have a sliding bar between them to allow the user to adjust which they would like to see more of (list vs. document)

Because of these requirements the only solution I can think of is a frameset. This is because using a purely DHTML sliding bar will not work when the user attempts to move the bar towards the loaded document as the plug-in then takes control of the mouse and there is no guaranteed method of getting any response form the plug-in to determine where the sliding bar should move to. By using a frameset I can take advantage of the browsers overruling power on the plug-ins and get the desired results.

Now comes my problem, the client has informed me that I must make this web application cross-browser (IE and Firefox). Everything is good in Firefox, but in IE the frameset has a 3d indented border going all around the document list and document (which the client is saying users will be confused by, how, I don't know). I can remove this border by setting the frameBorder property to 0 but then the sliding bar between the list and document is not present, which completely defeats the purpose. I have tried to use CSS to fix this problem, but nothing I have tried seems to work.

Has anyone encountered this type of problem before and if so, how did you get around it?

Your assistance is appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/636157-frameset-problems/
Share on other sites

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I have managed to get around this problem by posting the browser information to the server and then using that to determine how to setup the frames for the browser that is being used.

Unfortunately I have found another problem. There are some drop down navigation and when this navigation drops over a PDF that is loaded in a frame the PDF shows up over the menu.

I have managed to fix this in IE by absolutely positioning and sizing an iFrame behind the menu. This does not solve the problem in Firefox. Has anyone found workarounds to problems like these?

  • 0

Pip, thanks for the reply. Is your suggestion for the split bar not showing or for the overlapping PDF. I assume it is for the split bar, but I tried that a while ago and it seems that CSS border property has no effect on the frame if the frameBorder property is set to 'no' or '0', which seems to be the only way to get rid of the 3d effect in IE. Either way I have found a work around for that issue and it is working satisfactorily, do you happen to have any tips on how to get around the PDF overlap problem?

Thanks again.

  • 0

Does anyone know of a solution to the problem of a PDF, Java Applet, or other plug-in component overlapping a drop down menu in Firefox?

I have been able to fix this issue in IE by dynamically sizing and placing an iFrame behind my drop downs, this does not work in Firefox.

This is a mock-up in Firefox

post-210605-1214507754.jpg

And this is the same mock-up in IE

post-210605-1214507828.jpg

Any help is greatly appreciated.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Lmao. Cries about not playing those games not installed and yet don't ever want to touch them.
    • If I want to merge folder trees that have a similar structure, Beyond Compare is always my first choice. It's not free but it's awesome. If I want to just scan a whole drive/folder and find duplicates that are taking up space, I like Czkawka.
    • Claude Code gets throttled as Anthropic rolls out fresh usage caps by David Uzondu Claude Code, the AI-in-terminal utility developed by Anthropic and launched back in February, is getting updated usage limits following weeks of user complaints about being abruptly cut off. Many developers on the "$200/month Max plan" found their access blocked after just a few requests, with no explanation from the company. In a recent thread posted to X, the AI lab explained that it has seen "unprecedented demand since launch," pointing to some of its heaviest users who were running the tool continuously in the background 24/7, with one person reportedly consuming tens of thousands of dollars in model usage on a single $200 subscription. Anthropic also claimed that some users were violating its usage policy by sharing and reselling accounts, which impacts system capacity for everyone. These factors all led the company to announce new weekly limits that will be added on top of the existing five-hour caps, effective August 28. Max plan subscribers will have the option to buy additional usage at standard API rates if they hit their cap. Here's what the new weekly limits look like: Pro Plan ($20/month): An estimated 40 to 80 hours of usage with the Sonnet 4 model. Max Plan ($100/month): An estimated 140 to 280 hours with Sonnet 4 and 15 to 35 hours with the top-tier Opus 4 model. Max Plan ($200/month): An estimated 240 to 480 hours with Sonnet 4 and 24 to 40 hours with Opus 4. Per TechCrunch, the company provided these hour-based estimates, noting that the actual numbers may vary based on the size of a project's codebase. What's interesting is how this new structure compares to the old marketing. Anthropic previously advertised its $200 Max plan as offering 20 times more usage than the Pro plan. Based on these new hourly estimates, that multiple is now closer to six. It is possible the 20x figure still applies when measured in tokens or raw compute, but, according to TechCrunch, the company has not clarified that point.
    • I don't give a rat's f### what Trumpette, the Putin puppet likes!
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Gladiattore earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Gladiattore earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NeoWeen earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Doreen768 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      637
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      260
    3. 3
      Xenon
      164
    4. 4
      neufuse
      142
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      107
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!