• 0

Is there a better addressbook for Outlook 03


Question

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Thank You Gary. But it doesn't integrate with Outlook, right?

Joel, I agree that using Contacts view or Contact section of Outlook is really good, but even that is not enough under certain conditions.

For example you cannot just type the name or e-mail address of the person you are looking for and have it just minimize the results, you still have to go through all of your contact before finding the correct person. It is just not that easy when you have 2000 contacts.

What I would love is the auto complete with either first name, last name, displayed name, company or e-mail address as I am typing or with some sort of fast search. That would have been great.

  • 0
Thank You Gary. But it doesn't integrate with Outlook, right?

Joel, I agree that using Contacts view or Contact section of Outlook is really good, but even that is not enough under certain conditions.

For example you cannot just type the name or e-mail address of the person you are looking for and have it just minimize the results, you still have to go through all of your contact before finding the correct person. It is just not that easy when you have 2000 contacts.

What I would love is the auto complete with either first name, last name, displayed name, company or e-mail address as I am typing or with some sort of fast search. That would have been great.

I guess it doesn't. Sorry. Upgrade to Outlook 2007. It is great and use the contacts and not the address book . You may have to fiddle with the options.

  • 0
I am going to have to try 2007, can't say that I am a fan of the "ribbon". Thanks anyway. I just thought there would be an add-on or plugin for Outlook which would make the address book view better and more functional.

The only time I used Outlook 2003 was on my company's network. They used an exchange server and the contacts had thousands of names but it was on their mail server. It did not look like the one that you showed.

  • 0
Joel, I agree that using Contacts view or Contact section of Outlook is really good, but even that is not enough under certain conditions.

For example you cannot just type the name or e-mail address of the person you are looking for and have it just minimize the results, you still have to go through all of your contact before finding the correct person. It is just not that easy when you have 2000 contacts.

What I would love is the auto complete with either first name, last name, displayed name, company or e-mail address as I am typing or with some sort of fast search. That would have been great.

You can. Have you ever tried? Type the name in the To: field and compose your message and send. If you're not talking about when you compose, then please explain what exactly you're trying to accomplish. If you're talking sorting, sort by Categories if you don't have a field that suits you for sorting in the default views, or customise a view.

  • 0

Gary, this is also my company's e-mail and calender stuff but we do not use Exchange server. The contacts are just stored locally on each workstation.

Joel, yes it is what I am talking about. I compose a new message, and type like ' Bob ' on the To: field, and hit "Check Names" or just hit "Send", if there isn't a single Bob on my "Contacts", the screen shot I posted on my First Post shows up. This screen does not allow me to sort by any of the field I mentioned. Neither I can customize the fields.

Do you run Outlook 2003? Could you please go to compose new e-mail and just type a random name and hit check names and post the name selection screen? Just to see if yours is any different or if you can sort by any one of the fields.

Sure, we can sort by anything on the Contacts section of Outlook, but not on its Address Book or whatever it is using when composing a new e-mail. I think it is called "Select Names" dialog. Outlook only allows sort by Last Name or by Display Name, which has to go through options and not directly on the dialog screen.

  • 0

Problem is not Bob, but when you just know someone's company or the way it is put in your address book.

Composing new message is not a problem, but when replying or forwarding is, because you cannot really pick a name or add someone using Select Names dialog.

Anyway, I think I am going to get used to it. I am going to try to change it so it sorts by Display Name instead to see if it gets easier.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!