Opera 9981 beats Firefox 3.0pre in a Mozilla benchmark


Recommended Posts

The Linux performance of Opera is still a bit on the slower side, but the Windows version just speeds up with every new snapshot release.

And now the newest (and fastest) snapshot of Opera (build 9981) actually beats the newest (and fastest AFAIK) nightly of Firefox (2008051011) in the Mozilla javascript performance test, the Dromaeo benchmark.

Opera score :

http://dromaeo.com/?id=9707

Firefox score :

http://dromaeo.com/?id=9709

The latest Opera snapshot :

http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/2008/...d-optimizations

It's quite a feat when you consider that just more than a couple weeks ago Opera was behind Firefox by 1 whole second, and now they are ahead by 100ms, not to mention it's a test made by Mozilla :cool:

100 ms :| as if I care about it when I browse some web sites

well, it's a benchmark, and the total result is just around 2 second, so when you put it into perspective, from 1 second (50%) slower to 100ms (5%) faster in a couple of weeks is quite a feat ;)

Especially when Firefox made it sound like a huge thing by claiming itself to be the fastest browser when b5 was released, so it's fair game :p

Your result is in the 11 thousand range, the new Opera build is in the 2 thousand range ;)

Depends on the machine. My FFb5 is in the low 1000's http://dromaeo.com/?id=9815

Anywho, this is good. Faster browsers are better for us (the consumer). Yay for competition!

No doubt the latest Opera weekly is faster. However, my results tend to differ from yours:

Opera 9.5 beta build 9981: 1392

Minefield 2008051107: 1353

Firefox 2.0.0.14: 6992.6 (lol)

Webkit r33029: 1246.4

Results are too close to call for the latest Opera and Firefox previews. So let's just sit back and pat both on the back for speeding up their products. :yes:

Edit: Let's give Webkit some praise too.

Edited by rm20010
Ya in ms. big deal. Wait until your Opera becomes final. I have never heard of this test site. As far as I know it is meaningless.

well it's about as meaningless as how the Mozilla guys made it sound like a BIG DEAL when ff3b5 was released and claimed itself as the fastest browser for some synthetic javascript benchmark. And some dude here even posted a "Firefox beats everything" thread back then, so it's fair game :p

and obviously it's quite a big deal to them since they even made their own javascript benchmark, the Dromaeo, so yeah this test site is THE Mozilla javascript test, it's no wonder you haven't heard of it since Mozilla just made it after firefox3b5. If you have something against it, tell that to the Mozilla guys, and tell them to wait their Firefox becomes final instead of beta 5 :p

But then they both make some great progress in javascript performance lately, so kudos to both teams, and to the webkit for being very very fast all this time.

This is a generic browser test site that happened to have been made by a Mozilla (and jQuery) guy. Mozilla have taken it and are working with other browser guys to make the test better.

Not everything has to be a "us vs. them" thing.

This is a generic browser test site that happened to have been made by a Mozilla (and jQuery) guy. Mozilla have taken it and are working with other browser guys to make the test better.

Not everything has to be a "us vs. them" thing.

So? it doesn't change the fact that it is THE Mozilla javascript test. It's not a "us vs. them" thing, it's just a fair game after all those "Firefox 3b5 fastest browser" reports everywhere for the past month or so :p

I tried this in IE7 and it just froze and I had to end the process lol.

yea, IE7 freezes, IE8 beta 1 can pass the test, I guess that means the IE guys are also doing a good work lately (compared to themselves before that is) :p

I think the fact that when the flashing contest button on the NW frontpage was broken and used a full core on IE, and ~25%(50% of one core) on FF and what was it 5% or so on Opera shows wich browser handles scripts better :)

I still use Maxthon though, but I may change when 9.5 is final.

Ya in ms. big deal. Wait until your Opera becomes final. I have never heard of this test site. As far as I know it is meaningless.

Javascript performance isn't meaningless though, especially not in this day and age of Javascript-heavy AJAX sites.

So this is interesting, and I think there's no coincidence both Mozilla and Opera have been focusing a bit on this lately. Sites may widely be affected, regardless if it's about Gmail or e.g. Digg.

Well I did some benchmarks on my computer (x2 4800+ @2.64Ghz / WinXP) and it does seem to be speedy but Firefox 3.0pre 080512 (ayakawa's PGO build) had a slight edge over Opera 9981 in JavaScript when I tested. Overall both seem very fast and you probably wouldn't notice much of a difference between the two.

Opera Score 2278.20ms (Total)

http://dromaeo.com/?id=10000

Firefox Score 1987.60ms (Total)

http://dromaeo.com/?id=10004

JavaScript Performance Test

Firefox firefox30prewj4.png

Opera opera9981os3.png

DOM Core Performance Appending, Prepending, Inserting, Indexing, Removing

Firefox (avg. of 10 tests): 961.1ms

Opera (avg. of 10 tests): 511.1ms

DOM Core Performance Parsing

Firefox (avg. of 10 tests): 1359ms

Opera (avg. of 10 tests): 1467.7ms

hmm

if I add up the scores form the 3 tests you showed/listed I get

FF: 2585

Opera: 2330

Well if you add in the SunSpider Javascript benchmark in which Opera is about 2 seconds slower, then Firefox would take a considerable lead.

SunSpider Result Firefox 3770.4ms

SunSpider Result Opera 5775.4ms

All said and done optimized Firefox 3.0pre builds are still faster with javascript then Opera and Opera is still faster rendering the other objects on the page other than javascript. If they stay neck and neck like this while continuing to improve, performance won't even be much of a factor when making a decision to use either Opera 9.50 or Firefox 3.0 once the final versions are released.

well, it seems Firefox managed to improve its score steadily in the past few days with each new build

http://dromaeo.com/?id=10161

Also I guess it depends a lot on the system, maybe that's what the PGO is about. It's faster on the Woodcrest system, but a bit slower on my old Thinkpad

http://dromaeo.com/?id=10162

http://dromaeo.com/?id=10164

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!