BFG 8800 GTS 512MB will out perform a 9800 GX2 1GB


Do you think the BFG Tech 9800 GTX is better  

19 members have voted

  1. 1. Which BFG Tech card is better

    • 1GB BFG Tech 9800 GX2, PCI-E 2.0, Mem 2000MHz, GDDR3, GPU 600MHz, Stream 256, 2x DL DVI-I/HDMI
      16
    • 512MB BFG Tech 9800 GTX, PCI-E 2.0, Mem 2200MHz, GDDR3, GPU 675MHz, Stream 128, 2x DL DVI/HDTV
      3


Recommended Posts

OK,

We have been disusing this all day until we are blue in the face and I think we need to put this to the vote. My buddy thinks I should get a BFG 9800 GX2 1BG BFG and my argument here is the fact that 2 BFG 9800 512MB GTX cards in SLI mode will out perform this card, and to make my case even stronger I found an article somewhere even a tech support guy from BFG states that 2 9800 GTX 512MB in SLI mode will out perform 1 GX2 1GB card? I believe I'm right and Tom's Hardware did not give the 9800 GX2 a good article, now did HEXUS. So the jury is out on this one I think the 9800 GTX 512 in SLI mode is better, cheaper and will perform better than one solid chunk of at least ?365.00 for one card when I can pay... what just over this for two cards making 1GB.

So what is your view GX2 or GTS 8800 512 in SLI mode?

What are your views please I would like to know, and I might of fudged up the poll. so apologise in advance if it does not turn out right.

I'm no expert in hardware so I may be wrong but I believe at higher resolutions where some games start seeing a GPU Memory bottleneck the 1GB 9800 GX2 would get better FPS because SLI only takes the GPU memory from one card, so 2x 512MB 9800 GTX would still only be 512MB of GPU Memory whereas the GX2 has the full 1GB.

Edit: actually... I think I might be wrong :p

Edited by James123

You REALLY need to decide if you're asking about the 9800 GTX or the 8800 GTX, I'm assuming you mean the 9800 (from the clock speeds you've posted, which are the stock speeds for the 9800GTX), in which case, you need to fix the title, and the poll to reference that it's SLI

In terms of performance, yes, SLI 9800GTXs will beat a 9800GX2, most importantly because they'll have a bit higher throughput due to higher clocks (both essentially become SLI G92s at different clock speeds, of which the higher will win in GPU bound activities)

There's also an issue of whether two cards sharing a PCI-E 2.0 slot will impact the performance, which it might, but not by a lot.

You REALLY need to decide if you're asking about the 9800 GTX or the 8800 GTX, I'm assuming you mean the 9800 (from the clock speeds you've posted, which are the stock speeds for the 9800GTX), in which case, you need to fix the title, and the poll to reference that it's SLI

In terms of performance, yes, SLI 9800GTXs will beat a 9800GX2, most importantly because they'll have a bit higher throughput due to higher clocks (both essentially become SLI G92s at different clock speeds, of which the higher will win in GPU bound activities)

There's also an issue of whether two cards sharing a PCI-E 2.0 slot will impact the performance, which it might, but not by a lot.

Yeah I heard about this and I do believe this the case.

I just found this warning message for the BFG 9800 GX2 1GB card, which I found amusing, because there are people out there who you have to draw a picture for and explain to them in Layman's Terms. I would imagine there are people out there who have done this and blown their card andtheir money down the drain. It's common sense.

* Please note that you must have 6pin AND 8pin PCI Express graphics card connectors on your PSU and both of these connected to the Graphics card.*

** Please DO NOT plug in your 8-pin motherboard (CPU) connector from the PSU to the graphics card as this will blow the card and invalidate your warranty. Please refer to document enclosed with your card for further instructions.**

Edited by Meacham
So the jury is out on this one I think the 9800 GTX 512 in SLI mode is better, cheaper and will perform better than one solid chunk of at least ?365.00 for one card when I can pay... what just over this for two cards making 1GB.

One 9800 GX2 should cost less then two 9800 GTX in SLI?

It's possible because both cards are based on the G92 core, and the 9800GX2 could be clocked below an overclocked 8800GTS 512. Some games may not take advantage of the dual GPU config with the 9800GX2 either, and especially at low(er) resolution -- like, not 1920x1200 -- there are chances in a given scenario that the 8800GTS 512 that can outperform a 9800GX2. The 9800GX2 is not clocked very high at factory specs anyways.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!