BFG 8800 GTS 512MB will out perform a 9800 GX2 1GB


Do you think the BFG Tech 9800 GTX is better  

19 members have voted

  1. 1. Which BFG Tech card is better

    • 1GB BFG Tech 9800 GX2, PCI-E 2.0, Mem 2000MHz, GDDR3, GPU 600MHz, Stream 256, 2x DL DVI-I/HDMI
      16
    • 512MB BFG Tech 9800 GTX, PCI-E 2.0, Mem 2200MHz, GDDR3, GPU 675MHz, Stream 128, 2x DL DVI/HDTV
      3


Recommended Posts

OK,

We have been disusing this all day until we are blue in the face and I think we need to put this to the vote. My buddy thinks I should get a BFG 9800 GX2 1BG BFG and my argument here is the fact that 2 BFG 9800 512MB GTX cards in SLI mode will out perform this card, and to make my case even stronger I found an article somewhere even a tech support guy from BFG states that 2 9800 GTX 512MB in SLI mode will out perform 1 GX2 1GB card? I believe I'm right and Tom's Hardware did not give the 9800 GX2 a good article, now did HEXUS. So the jury is out on this one I think the 9800 GTX 512 in SLI mode is better, cheaper and will perform better than one solid chunk of at least ?365.00 for one card when I can pay... what just over this for two cards making 1GB.

So what is your view GX2 or GTS 8800 512 in SLI mode?

What are your views please I would like to know, and I might of fudged up the poll. so apologise in advance if it does not turn out right.

I'm no expert in hardware so I may be wrong but I believe at higher resolutions where some games start seeing a GPU Memory bottleneck the 1GB 9800 GX2 would get better FPS because SLI only takes the GPU memory from one card, so 2x 512MB 9800 GTX would still only be 512MB of GPU Memory whereas the GX2 has the full 1GB.

Edit: actually... I think I might be wrong :p

Edited by James123

You REALLY need to decide if you're asking about the 9800 GTX or the 8800 GTX, I'm assuming you mean the 9800 (from the clock speeds you've posted, which are the stock speeds for the 9800GTX), in which case, you need to fix the title, and the poll to reference that it's SLI

In terms of performance, yes, SLI 9800GTXs will beat a 9800GX2, most importantly because they'll have a bit higher throughput due to higher clocks (both essentially become SLI G92s at different clock speeds, of which the higher will win in GPU bound activities)

There's also an issue of whether two cards sharing a PCI-E 2.0 slot will impact the performance, which it might, but not by a lot.

You REALLY need to decide if you're asking about the 9800 GTX or the 8800 GTX, I'm assuming you mean the 9800 (from the clock speeds you've posted, which are the stock speeds for the 9800GTX), in which case, you need to fix the title, and the poll to reference that it's SLI

In terms of performance, yes, SLI 9800GTXs will beat a 9800GX2, most importantly because they'll have a bit higher throughput due to higher clocks (both essentially become SLI G92s at different clock speeds, of which the higher will win in GPU bound activities)

There's also an issue of whether two cards sharing a PCI-E 2.0 slot will impact the performance, which it might, but not by a lot.

Yeah I heard about this and I do believe this the case.

I just found this warning message for the BFG 9800 GX2 1GB card, which I found amusing, because there are people out there who you have to draw a picture for and explain to them in Layman's Terms. I would imagine there are people out there who have done this and blown their card andtheir money down the drain. It's common sense.

* Please note that you must have 6pin AND 8pin PCI Express graphics card connectors on your PSU and both of these connected to the Graphics card.*

** Please DO NOT plug in your 8-pin motherboard (CPU) connector from the PSU to the graphics card as this will blow the card and invalidate your warranty. Please refer to document enclosed with your card for further instructions.**

Edited by Meacham
So the jury is out on this one I think the 9800 GTX 512 in SLI mode is better, cheaper and will perform better than one solid chunk of at least ?365.00 for one card when I can pay... what just over this for two cards making 1GB.

One 9800 GX2 should cost less then two 9800 GTX in SLI?

It's possible because both cards are based on the G92 core, and the 9800GX2 could be clocked below an overclocked 8800GTS 512. Some games may not take advantage of the dual GPU config with the 9800GX2 either, and especially at low(er) resolution -- like, not 1920x1200 -- there are chances in a given scenario that the 8800GTS 512 that can outperform a 9800GX2. The 9800GX2 is not clocked very high at factory specs anyways.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
    • Depends on what you need. Might be a bit clearer on what you plan to do with it. Sort of a waste if you get the newest and greatest, but don't know how to use it.
    • NTLite 2026.06.11200 by Razvan Serea NTLite is a Windows configuration tool that allows you to modify your existing Windows install or an image yet to be deployed, remove Windows components, configure and integrate, speed up the Windows deployment process. Reduce Windows footprint on your RAM and storage drive memory. Remove components of your choice, guarded by compatibility safety mechanisms, which speed up finding that sweet spot. Windows Unattended feature support, providing many commonly used options on a single page for easy setup. Easily integrate a single or multiple drivers, update or language packages. Package integration features smart sorting, enabling you to seamlessly add packages for integration and the tool will apply them in the appropriate order, keeping hotfix compatibility in check. One of the important new features of NTLite (compared to its predecessors) is the ability to modify an already installed the operating system, by removing unnecessary components. Supports Windows 11, 10, 8.1 and 7, x86 and x64, live and image. Server editions of the same versions, excluding support for component removals and feature configuration. ARM64 image support in the alpha stage. Does not support Checked/Debug, Embedded, IoT editions, nor Vista or XP. NTLite 2026.06.11200 changelog: New Secure Boot Migration support: Verification, certificate staging, and boot-manager/sector update across the Image, Updates, Apply, and Create-ISO pages (2023 CA migration, optional 2011 revocation, Anti-rollback, Boot sector choice etc) Secure Boot Host Readiness: Live host Secure Boot migration monitor and Servicing-task control Option under Image page - C:\Windows row, or load the host as the target - Updates - Secure Boot Image: 'Sort mounted images first' option for the image list in Menu-Settings UI: Hover description card for Components and Unattended pages, selectable text and quick access to Compatibility options Command line: Relay commands into the already-running instance Enables controlling already running NTLite via ntlite.exe Use /NewInstance to launch an additional instance using CLI operations (premium) UI: 'New instance' option via main menu instead of a secondary ntlite.exe prompt Apply: Hide individual Apply-page notes with a per-note dismiss (X), critical excluded Settings: 'Unsigned RDP file launch warnings' tweak (RDP client), bypassing the April 2026 security-update prompt on RDP connections Upgrade Image: Live OS and deployed image editing now unlocked on free/test licenses, same licensing as images Image: 'Recompress' option in manual dialog Remove Editions to shrink the WIM in one session Image: SWM part size set inline on the Apply page and image dialogs, split-size popup retired Image: Relative 'Last change' dates; editions grouped by build time to reduce noise Image: 'Forget - Missing' on the Edit-cache menu to mass drop entries whose folder is gone Components: Root groups reorganized - user-facing groups first, system/critical last Components: Show filter options to view components by Template or App-type, since Apps are now merged into groups Presets: Delete confirmation now lists the multi-selected preset names UI: Design update propagated to the rest of the tool UI: Filter and search match words in any order and partially, better results filtering Components Unattended: Input-locale language derives from the user locale, with an independent keyboard picker, enables combinations previously unavailable Unattended: Input-locale now allows for a user value override Unattended: Localization OOBE WinPE now can be copied with the new WinPE Copy OOBE localization toggle, enter locale settings once for both stages Updates: Downloader greys and locks updates the image already carries (hotfix and MSIX) Updates: Resume interrupted update downloads Command line: Many upgrades, see /?, now prints help to the console or redirected output UI-Translation: Finnish language added, also thanks for Chinese Traditional (Matt), French (tistou77), Italian (clarensio), Russian (RDS), Swedish (1FF), Vietnamese (Vu Anh Vu) Fix Components: Containers removal breaking Apps deployment Components: Microsoft Account had leftovers when Easy Migrate is kept Image: Export to an existing WIM improvements, Append renamed to Merge Image: Improved 26H1 live removal support Image: No more 'X:\ not accessible' popup for certain drives during image scan Presets: Manual image refresh picks up presets added/removed outside the app Tweaks: Disabled visual-effect animations no longer return after first logon on a new profile Tweaks: Live Visual Effects toggles (animations, drag full windows, font smoothing) now apply correctly Download: NTLite 2026.06.11200 | 20.5 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Link: NTLite Home Page | NTLite Features | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      258
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!