BFG 8800 GTS 512MB will out perform a 9800 GX2 1GB


Do you think the BFG Tech 9800 GTX is better  

19 members have voted

  1. 1. Which BFG Tech card is better

    • 1GB BFG Tech 9800 GX2, PCI-E 2.0, Mem 2000MHz, GDDR3, GPU 600MHz, Stream 256, 2x DL DVI-I/HDMI
      16
    • 512MB BFG Tech 9800 GTX, PCI-E 2.0, Mem 2200MHz, GDDR3, GPU 675MHz, Stream 128, 2x DL DVI/HDTV
      3


Recommended Posts

OK,

We have been disusing this all day until we are blue in the face and I think we need to put this to the vote. My buddy thinks I should get a BFG 9800 GX2 1BG BFG and my argument here is the fact that 2 BFG 9800 512MB GTX cards in SLI mode will out perform this card, and to make my case even stronger I found an article somewhere even a tech support guy from BFG states that 2 9800 GTX 512MB in SLI mode will out perform 1 GX2 1GB card? I believe I'm right and Tom's Hardware did not give the 9800 GX2 a good article, now did HEXUS. So the jury is out on this one I think the 9800 GTX 512 in SLI mode is better, cheaper and will perform better than one solid chunk of at least ?365.00 for one card when I can pay... what just over this for two cards making 1GB.

So what is your view GX2 or GTS 8800 512 in SLI mode?

What are your views please I would like to know, and I might of fudged up the poll. so apologise in advance if it does not turn out right.

I'm no expert in hardware so I may be wrong but I believe at higher resolutions where some games start seeing a GPU Memory bottleneck the 1GB 9800 GX2 would get better FPS because SLI only takes the GPU memory from one card, so 2x 512MB 9800 GTX would still only be 512MB of GPU Memory whereas the GX2 has the full 1GB.

Edit: actually... I think I might be wrong :p

Edited by James123

You REALLY need to decide if you're asking about the 9800 GTX or the 8800 GTX, I'm assuming you mean the 9800 (from the clock speeds you've posted, which are the stock speeds for the 9800GTX), in which case, you need to fix the title, and the poll to reference that it's SLI

In terms of performance, yes, SLI 9800GTXs will beat a 9800GX2, most importantly because they'll have a bit higher throughput due to higher clocks (both essentially become SLI G92s at different clock speeds, of which the higher will win in GPU bound activities)

There's also an issue of whether two cards sharing a PCI-E 2.0 slot will impact the performance, which it might, but not by a lot.

You REALLY need to decide if you're asking about the 9800 GTX or the 8800 GTX, I'm assuming you mean the 9800 (from the clock speeds you've posted, which are the stock speeds for the 9800GTX), in which case, you need to fix the title, and the poll to reference that it's SLI

In terms of performance, yes, SLI 9800GTXs will beat a 9800GX2, most importantly because they'll have a bit higher throughput due to higher clocks (both essentially become SLI G92s at different clock speeds, of which the higher will win in GPU bound activities)

There's also an issue of whether two cards sharing a PCI-E 2.0 slot will impact the performance, which it might, but not by a lot.

Yeah I heard about this and I do believe this the case.

I just found this warning message for the BFG 9800 GX2 1GB card, which I found amusing, because there are people out there who you have to draw a picture for and explain to them in Layman's Terms. I would imagine there are people out there who have done this and blown their card andtheir money down the drain. It's common sense.

* Please note that you must have 6pin AND 8pin PCI Express graphics card connectors on your PSU and both of these connected to the Graphics card.*

** Please DO NOT plug in your 8-pin motherboard (CPU) connector from the PSU to the graphics card as this will blow the card and invalidate your warranty. Please refer to document enclosed with your card for further instructions.**

Edited by Meacham
So the jury is out on this one I think the 9800 GTX 512 in SLI mode is better, cheaper and will perform better than one solid chunk of at least ?365.00 for one card when I can pay... what just over this for two cards making 1GB.

One 9800 GX2 should cost less then two 9800 GTX in SLI?

It's possible because both cards are based on the G92 core, and the 9800GX2 could be clocked below an overclocked 8800GTS 512. Some games may not take advantage of the dual GPU config with the 9800GX2 either, and especially at low(er) resolution -- like, not 1920x1200 -- there are chances in a given scenario that the 8800GTS 512 that can outperform a 9800GX2. The 9800GX2 is not clocked very high at factory specs anyways.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Opinion. All you did was blame Democrats for everything. You offered nothing but a hit piece to support your pro Trump, anti union right wing ideology.
    • Excuse me for having an opinion, fella'... (Why am I not surprised?...) Congrats on your very informative post however...
    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! * One additional problem corporations have that I also do not sympathize with is they don't want to pay to train their American employees. They could easily do so, but would rather not have to pay for it. I find that pathetic, actually. It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!