• 0

Which Software ?


Question

11 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

It isn't the "software" that makes sites professional. It is the skills, abilities and experiences of the programmer.

A good developer can make a good site with a variety of tools.

A bad developer will make crap, no matter what tools they have.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/636385-which-software/#findComment-589392999
Share on other sites

  • 0

What tool do you all use to be more productive?

(I'm serious. As a person who used to tinker around a bit in Yahoo! GeoCities in 2003 I really want to get back into web design. I honestly don't remember much about HTML, so would I be better off starting off with a WYSIWYG program?)

EDIT: And honestly, which language do you think is the most productive? I seem to be leaning more toward to HTML as I'm more fond of it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/636385-which-software/#findComment-589403896
Share on other sites

  • 0
What tool do you all use to be more productive?

(I'm serious. As a person who used to tinker around a bit in Yahoo! GeoCities in 2003 I really want to get back into web design. I honestly don't remember much about HTML, so would I be better off starting off with a WYSIWYG program?)

EDIT: And honestly, which language do you think is the most productive? I seem to be leaning more toward to HTML as I'm more fond of it.

Don't ever use WYSIWYG if you want to get into real web-dev. Always write the code yourself.

There's no choice of language for web frontends. It's just HTML & CSS...Actually do XHTML since HTML (up to version 4) is kind of outdated by now.

For web backend, you have a plethora of server-side languages to use, PHP being the most common.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/636385-which-software/#findComment-589403987
Share on other sites

  • 0
It isn't the "software" that makes sites professional. It is the skills, abilities and experiences of the programmer.

A good developer can make a good site with a variety of tools.

A bad developer will make crap, no matter what tools they have.

Well said, I used Notepad btw... :)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/636385-which-software/#findComment-589404410
Share on other sites

  • 0
Dreamweaver

Agreed.

Using a program makes it easier, but it isn't going to be what makes your site great. Sometimes just typing out code in notepad works out better than any program you can find.

It really just depends on your skill level ultimately. If you are just starting out, pick a program that easy to learn and use and stick with it. If you need something done quickly, again, stick with a program.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/636385-which-software/#findComment-589404440
Share on other sites

  • 0

I use dreamweaver, however I find myself always in the code tab, and not the WYSIWYG. IT IS NICE, however, to be able to go into the WYSIWYG to see updates on what your site is doing, and to move pictures, align things, etc. Dreamweaver is hands down the most user-friendly web program I have come across. In Cs3, Dreamweaver actually has scripts that save you loads of time. If you write a body tag, <body, just like that, a drop down menu will occur and show you MOST of the attributes for a body tag so you don't have to go searching on the net ot typing it out yourself. Also, to close tags all you do is type </ and Dreamweaver will complete and KNOW which tag you are closing </body>, for example.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/636385-which-software/#findComment-589404782
Share on other sites

  • 0

There's no software that'll take what you put in and make it visually attractive. It's all up to you to make it that way. If you don't know anything about coding, then I suggest you visit W3Schools and do their XHTML and CSS tutorials. Don't rely on a WYSIWYG program - it's always better to hand code (at least in my opinion) because most programs put in extra crap that you don't need.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/636385-which-software/#findComment-589404788
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • VidCoder 12.20 by Razvan Serea  VidCoder is a DVD/Blu-ray ripping and video transcoding application for Windows. It uses HandBrake as its encoding engine. Calling directly into the HandBrake library gives it a more rich UI than the official HandBrake Windows GUI. VidCoder can rip DVDs but does not defeat the CSS encryption found in most commercial DVDs. You’ll need the NET 8 Desktop Runtime. If you don’t have it, VidCoder will prompt you to download and install it. The Portable version is self-contained and does not require any .NET Runtime to be installed. You do not need to install HandBrake for VidCoder to work. Feature list: Multi-threaded MP4, MKV containers Completely integrated encoding pipeline: everything is in one process and no huge intermediate temporary files H.264, H.265, MPEG-4, MPEG-2, VP8, Theora video Hardware-accelerated encoding with AMD VCE, Nvidia NVENC and Intel QuickSync AAC, MP3, Vorbis, AC3, FLAC audio encoding and AAC/AC3/MP3/DTS/DTS-HD passthrough Target bitrate, size or quality for video 2-pass encoding Decomb, detelecine, deinterlace, rotate, reflect, chroma smooth, colorspace filters Powerful batch encoding with simultaneous encodes Customizable Pickers to automatically pick audio and subtitle tracks, destination, titles and more Instant source previews Creates small encoded preview clips Pause, resume encoding VidCoder 12.20 changes: Updated HandBrake core to 1.11.2. Download: VidCoder 12.20 | 47.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Portable VidCoder 12.19 | 89.3 MB Link: VidCoder Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Too soon, I'm still not over this death!
    • Normally, I admit when a title is clickbait (unfortunately, it's become somewhat necessary to compete against AI-dominated news sections today), but in this case, all supported versions is implied and doesn't need to be spelled out in the title. Of course, I'm covering a Patch Tuesday update bug that is only available to supported Windows SKUs. All our coverage relates to supported Windows software and SKUs only unless we expressly state that it's "unsupported", "unofficial", or "third-party". I'm sorry, but supported/official SKUs don't need to be spelled out as such in every Neowin headline.
    • ALL versions or ALL SUPPORTED versions? Neowin does it again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      595
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!