Recommended Posts

It was an alright finale, but I do think that's probably the last one we'll see. It's not that great of a show over all, but it did beat out anything else on tv for the time slot. If there's not a pilot that can replace it then show keep it going- hell it can only get better.

It was a good finale but it just didn't seem right.

Remember when Paul was being contacted by Laurence Dominic (The Dollhouse's head of security prior to Boyd) to find out the Dollhouse's purpose? What ever happened to that storey arc?

No more Millie? Everyone's on the hunt for Alpha? It seems like the interesting plots were wrapped up too quickly.

Anyone else agree?

I liked the season as a whole, and interesting twist in the story with Whiskey!

The one thing I don't think they really focussed on, was the self-awareness Echo is supposed to have gained in the Dollhouse. On the road to the pilot, that was one of the overriding themes that doesn't seem to have come into fruition.

In the last few scenes, I had a feeling it was Millie that Paul had organised to be set free, would have been way to simple to have been Caroline

All in all, good entertainment, here's hoping for a Season 2!

I liked the season as a whole, and interesting twist in the story with Whiskey!

The one thing I don't think they really focussed on, was the self-awareness Echo is supposed to have gained in the Dollhouse. On the road to the pilot, that was one of the overriding themes that doesn't seem to have come into fruition.

In the last few scenes, I had a feeling it was Millie that Paul had organised to be set free, would have been way to simple to have been Caroline

All in all, good entertainment, here's hoping for a Season 2!

what? that's exactly what the finale was about!!! when alpha imprinted her with all those personalities, the result was just 'echo'. echo the one who 'remembers' pieces of the imprints and is more aware than the others. when alpha did it, it was like that echo finale came to life. it's like a personality different than caroline's, made out of residuals from all her imprints.

It was a good finale but it just didn't seem right.

Remember when Paul was being contacted by Laurence Dominic (The Dollhouse's head of security prior to Boyd) to find out the Dollhouse's purpose? What ever happened to that storey arc?

No more Millie? Everyone's on the hunt for Alpha? It seems like the interesting plots were wrapped up too quickly.

Anyone else agree?

i dont thing it was dominic the one altering the imprints to contact paul. in fact, dominic told adele "if it wasnt for me he would have found you a lot sooner". There is obviously someone else, and it would've been nice to add that to the finale to leave a nice cliffhanger

Yeah it's probably over- It's a shame, but with those numbers I don't think Fox will renew it. Maybe it can be moved to another network.

Yeah but the fact remains it achieved much higher when SCC was on...its a great partnership (Y)

Yeah but the fact remains it achieved much higher when SCC was on...its a great partnership (Y)

It did, but I would say that there's a good chance that Fox will renew TSCC and probably move it to another night. I don't see them keeping it on Friday. TSCC will probably lead-in for Fringe, and they'll probably put one of there new pilots on Friday. I just don't see them keeping this show UNLESS the DVR numbers are really amazing. I know TSCC got like a 80% increase in DVR numbers- If Fox does renew it and keep the show on Friday it's probably going to be canceled soon after.

I would rather see the show moved to another network so we can see a few more seasons (I wish the same for TSCC). The finale showed this show does have good writers, and would probably be amazing if we could get a season two, but I just don't think Fox likes Joss Whedon that much.

Spinoff could take over where the main show left off?

Radha: Dollhouse's chances of renewal are reportedly slim. Please, please say it isn't so! Do you have any happier news?

You know that 14th episode of Dollhouse that's set in a post-Apocalyptic universe and that won't be appearing on Fox network but will be included on the season-one DVD? Well, no one's officially confirming anything, and this is all still entirely in the theoretical dreamy dream stage, but reliable sources tell us exclusively that spinning off "Epitaph One" into a new series is "not exactly outside the realm of Joss? master plan." So even if Dollhouse proper doesn't get a pickup for season two, there might still be an alternate Dollverse for us to play in. What do you think of that?!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!