Recommended Posts

Hey Guyz,

I have made a little utility for monitors. When I was in search for a new LCD I wanted to see how the colors are looking and what kinda geometry it will produce and how crisp the text is. Couldn't find anything to suite my needs so I wrote it myself. I found program like that after words but then I didn't wanted to throw it out so I kept it.

This utility shows Gradients of main colours, RGB colours, Black-White-Gray colours on any monitor at full screen resolution. It has a facility to perform speed tests and text test (can be used to see if the monitor can show sharp text). It also includes geometry tests to check and test monitor's display geometry. It works fine with 4:3 aspect ratio monitors and also on 16:9, 16:10 wide screen monitors.

NOTE: SOME OF THE TEST PRODUCE VERY QUICK FLASHING SCREEN WITH CHANGING COLOURS. PEOPLE WITH "Epileptic Conditions" SHOULD NOT USE THIS.

http://www.codelake.com/monitortest.html

What do you think?

Cheers :)

Edited by wrack
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/639009-monitor-test-utility/
Share on other sites

Amazing app! Definitely keeping it. Thank you so much, very well presented and GREAT functionality.

Whimpy internet speeds though ;p

275620265.png

Edit: Is it really bad that my monitor takes 2.604 seconds on that test that should take 1-1.25? I ran it at 1024*768, too..

Thanks (Y) Great app. I could hear my monitor (Dell 2007FPW) making a high pitched sound when performing the intensive box tests :p It rendered each one within the times though.

Thanks :) Yeah the box test is INTENSIVE :p but I am pretty sure it wont make a sound :laugh:

Thanks for this lil utility. :)

You are welcome.

I am planning to add few more stuff to it if time permits so will see if I can release a new version.

Thanks :) Yeah the box test is INTENSIVE :p but I am pretty sure it wont make a sound :laugh:

It's a humming sound when it renders it. That's what I meant :p It continues even when the rendering is done (and stops when you click to go back to the start screen - so I'm not quite sure. I wonder if other people with Dell monitors have it. It doesn't happen with anything else though, like video games etc.

Many thanks for your utility. Well designed and thought out piece.

Looking rather good with my Nvidia AGP MX2 and Samsung SyncMaster 400b here. Must also be the local power supply station !!!

I've updated my signature with your utility and this thread is linked. Hello readers!

No Virus scan was run on linked Executable in zip file via 3rd party website in the signature. Author please be

aware !

Wow - well I'd say that makes a change, does it not ?

Thanks :) Yeah the box test is INTENSIVE :p but I am pretty sure it wont make a sound :laugh:

You are welcome.

I am planning to add few more stuff to it if time permits so will see if I can release a new version.

It's a humming sound when it renders it. That's what I meant :p It continues even when the rendering is done (and stops when you click to go back to the start screen - so I'm not quite sure. I wonder if other people with Dell monitors have it. It doesn't happen with anything else though, like video games etc.

I have got Dell 2005 FPW and no sound at all..! Is the sound inbuilt in the monitor?

Many thanks for your utility. Well designed and thought out piece.

Looking rather good with my Nvidia AGP MX2 and Samsung SyncMaster 400b here. Must also be the local power supply station !!!

I've updated my signature with your utility and this thread is linked. Hello readers!

No Virus scan was run on linked Executable in zip file via 3rd party website in the signature. Author please be

aware !

Wow - well I'd say that makes a change, does it not ?

Thanks :)

I scan all the files I upload on my website with Kaspersky, AVG & ZoneAlarm. No bad signature found so far..!

That is very weird. Shouldn't really take that long. What graphics card are you using and what is monitor's response time?

Trouble is I don't have that resolution monitor to test that behaviour. I got 1680 X 1050 and it takes around 1.87 seconds on Intel's standard onboard graphics chip. With my nVidia graphics it kicks ass though.

Guess I need to review those times again and change them if necessary.

  • 1 month later...

OK it's been a while and for that I am sorry.

I tested the application on 1680X1050 screen again and it took me 1.80 second on average using an onboard graphics and using a dedicated graphics it took me 0.445 seconds. Now since the rendering of boxes is as much CPU intensive as GPU the CPU processing does make a difference so I can't really control it, unless I program the code to run using GPU.

I am testing 1900X1200 now and will post results soon.

If anyone is really concerned about the box test results but think that their monitor performance is satisfactory then I would say don't worry about it since that test was designed as a guideline only.

I wonder if other people with Dell monitors have it. It doesn't happen with anything else though, like video games etc.

No... and my monitor is 5 yrs old.

@OP: thanks for this little app. Works great :D. My intensive (read blinding) box test rendered at about .925, so I was pleased.

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 2 months later...

Thanks for the heads up guys. I am working towards version 2.0 of the utility now which will support multiple monitor setup. Once I am done with basic design and stuff I would love for some one with more than 2 monitors to test it. Just reply here and I would know who is interested.

http://www.codelake.com is the website where all my utils are listed.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
    • Rufus alternative Ventoy now supports Windows 11's mandatory update, fixes major boot bug by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has its own official Media Creation Tool used for making bootable USB media, there are some popular third-party utilities as well which offer additional options like bypassing system requirements, Microsoft Account creation, and more. One of these is Ventoy, and the software has received its latest update today. In fact, the app actually got a slew of updates over the last couple of days, three version releases in total, to be specific. The first release, version 1.1.13, was pulled as there was some unspecified error in the update, and as such, the corrected version 1.1.14 was pushed out. Following that on very short notice, 1.1.15 was published as well. For those unfamiliar, Ventoy is an open-source utility that lets users create a bootable USB drive once and then simply copy ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD, or EFI files onto it without repeatedly formatting the drive. It supports both legacy BIOS and UEFI boot modes, Secure Boot, and a wide range of operating systems, making it one of the most versatile tools in the category. The biggest change in version 1.1.14 is an updated Secure Boot shim file aimed at resolving the UEFI CA 2023 issue, which is basically a compatibility problem that has affected Secure Boot environments on some systems. If you recall, we reported about severe boot issues on HP devices following the release of updated Secure Boot 2023 keys. For anyone who may not be aware, back in early 2024, Microsoft announced that it was updating Secure Boot keys as they were going to become 15 years old in 2026, which is also when they are set to expire. As such, the new 2023 certificates have been rolling out with the newest Windows 11 updates. Updated boot manager and Secure Boot certificates are crucial for protection against malware like bootkits. These are mandatory updates. Alongside that, the VentoyPlugson graphical plugin configurator was updated in sync with the release. The update also introduces a new VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option within the Global Control plugin, giving users more flexibility in managing Secure Boot behavior. Ventoy has also received a fix for a startup issue when Secure Boot was disabled. Microsoft does officially allow users to boot systems without Secure Boot as long as the PC is Secure Boot capable. The full changelog is given below: Update secure boot shim file to solve the UEFI CA 2023 issue. The new release use a new CA, so you need to enroll the new key for the first boot time. VentoyPlugson update synchronously. Global control plugin add a VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option. Fix the boot issue when Secure Boot is disabled in the UEFI firmware. You can download the latest version of the app here on Ventoy's official GitHub repo or from Neowin software stories.
    • Windows 11 is fine, no issues on any of the machines I've run it on since release. The stricter security requirements are a good thing, sometimes the baseline needs to change and people will winge, but it is what it is. Happened with the move from 9x to NT - broke compatability Happened with XP SP2 when security started to become a serious consideration Certainly happend with Vista that brought in UAC, the concept of not running as admin (something that has been the norm in Linux/Unix from pretty much the start) and a completely new driver stack. Windows 11 will probably get looked back at as the point where even consumer and SMB IT was dragged kicking and screaming into a somewhat secure by default configuration.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!