Recommended Posts

Hey Guyz,

I have made a little utility for monitors. When I was in search for a new LCD I wanted to see how the colors are looking and what kinda geometry it will produce and how crisp the text is. Couldn't find anything to suite my needs so I wrote it myself. I found program like that after words but then I didn't wanted to throw it out so I kept it.

This utility shows Gradients of main colours, RGB colours, Black-White-Gray colours on any monitor at full screen resolution. It has a facility to perform speed tests and text test (can be used to see if the monitor can show sharp text). It also includes geometry tests to check and test monitor's display geometry. It works fine with 4:3 aspect ratio monitors and also on 16:9, 16:10 wide screen monitors.

NOTE: SOME OF THE TEST PRODUCE VERY QUICK FLASHING SCREEN WITH CHANGING COLOURS. PEOPLE WITH "Epileptic Conditions" SHOULD NOT USE THIS.

http://www.codelake.com/monitortest.html

What do you think?

Cheers :)

Edited by wrack
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/639009-monitor-test-utility/
Share on other sites

Amazing app! Definitely keeping it. Thank you so much, very well presented and GREAT functionality.

Whimpy internet speeds though ;p

275620265.png

Edit: Is it really bad that my monitor takes 2.604 seconds on that test that should take 1-1.25? I ran it at 1024*768, too..

Thanks (Y) Great app. I could hear my monitor (Dell 2007FPW) making a high pitched sound when performing the intensive box tests :p It rendered each one within the times though.

Thanks :) Yeah the box test is INTENSIVE :p but I am pretty sure it wont make a sound :laugh:

Thanks for this lil utility. :)

You are welcome.

I am planning to add few more stuff to it if time permits so will see if I can release a new version.

Thanks :) Yeah the box test is INTENSIVE :p but I am pretty sure it wont make a sound :laugh:

It's a humming sound when it renders it. That's what I meant :p It continues even when the rendering is done (and stops when you click to go back to the start screen - so I'm not quite sure. I wonder if other people with Dell monitors have it. It doesn't happen with anything else though, like video games etc.

Many thanks for your utility. Well designed and thought out piece.

Looking rather good with my Nvidia AGP MX2 and Samsung SyncMaster 400b here. Must also be the local power supply station !!!

I've updated my signature with your utility and this thread is linked. Hello readers!

No Virus scan was run on linked Executable in zip file via 3rd party website in the signature. Author please be

aware !

Wow - well I'd say that makes a change, does it not ?

Thanks :) Yeah the box test is INTENSIVE :p but I am pretty sure it wont make a sound :laugh:

You are welcome.

I am planning to add few more stuff to it if time permits so will see if I can release a new version.

It's a humming sound when it renders it. That's what I meant :p It continues even when the rendering is done (and stops when you click to go back to the start screen - so I'm not quite sure. I wonder if other people with Dell monitors have it. It doesn't happen with anything else though, like video games etc.

I have got Dell 2005 FPW and no sound at all..! Is the sound inbuilt in the monitor?

Many thanks for your utility. Well designed and thought out piece.

Looking rather good with my Nvidia AGP MX2 and Samsung SyncMaster 400b here. Must also be the local power supply station !!!

I've updated my signature with your utility and this thread is linked. Hello readers!

No Virus scan was run on linked Executable in zip file via 3rd party website in the signature. Author please be

aware !

Wow - well I'd say that makes a change, does it not ?

Thanks :)

I scan all the files I upload on my website with Kaspersky, AVG & ZoneAlarm. No bad signature found so far..!

That is very weird. Shouldn't really take that long. What graphics card are you using and what is monitor's response time?

Trouble is I don't have that resolution monitor to test that behaviour. I got 1680 X 1050 and it takes around 1.87 seconds on Intel's standard onboard graphics chip. With my nVidia graphics it kicks ass though.

Guess I need to review those times again and change them if necessary.

  • 1 month later...

OK it's been a while and for that I am sorry.

I tested the application on 1680X1050 screen again and it took me 1.80 second on average using an onboard graphics and using a dedicated graphics it took me 0.445 seconds. Now since the rendering of boxes is as much CPU intensive as GPU the CPU processing does make a difference so I can't really control it, unless I program the code to run using GPU.

I am testing 1900X1200 now and will post results soon.

If anyone is really concerned about the box test results but think that their monitor performance is satisfactory then I would say don't worry about it since that test was designed as a guideline only.

I wonder if other people with Dell monitors have it. It doesn't happen with anything else though, like video games etc.

No... and my monitor is 5 yrs old.

@OP: thanks for this little app. Works great :D. My intensive (read blinding) box test rendered at about .925, so I was pleased.

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 2 months later...

Thanks for the heads up guys. I am working towards version 2.0 of the utility now which will support multiple monitor setup. Once I am done with basic design and stuff I would love for some one with more than 2 monitors to test it. Just reply here and I would know who is interested.

http://www.codelake.com is the website where all my utils are listed.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
    • You could disable this "functionality/feature/whatever" with 2 registry keys, ages ago.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!