Recommended Posts

Does anyone have a great gdi++.ini they'd like to share?

Here's mine (I think it's alright, but could probably use a bit more tweaking):

[General]
HookChildProcesses=1
HintingMode=1
AntiAliasMode=1
MaxHeight=0
FontLoader=1
GammaMode=0
GammaValue=1.2
Contrast=1
RenderWeight=1.2
NormalWeight=1
BoldWeight=1
ItalicSlant=1
LcdFilter=0
LoadOnDemand=1
CacheMaxFaces=32
CacheMaxSizes=32
CacheMaxBytes=4194304
BolderMode=0
TextTuning=-1

[Individual]
Arial=RenderWeight,1

[Exclude]
Marlett
Segoe UI
Consolas

[ExcludeModule]
fontview.exe
msdev.exe
devenv.exe
gditray.exe
explorer.exe


[GdiTray]
MultiINISelector=0
RedrawDelay=50
CoolMenu=1

Your comparing it to a real mac though, they are two different styles of font smoothing. Not even GDI++ will give you the exact same font rendering as a Mac :p

FreeType can get really close, if not better.

What I don't understand is that it seems to render badly in GDI++ though, exact same settings on my old Linux installation gave me nice, thick looking bolds, etc. in GDI++ they're too thin.

I'm wondering.. I think the freetype thing that is bundled with linux systems is compiled without certain options that apple do use?

http://freetype.sourceforge.net/patents.html#licensing

However, the source code for the bytecode interpreter is still available and can be toggled on at compile time, for those that want to use it anyway (because they purchased a license from Apple, or because they are in a country where the patents do not apply, etc.). For details please check the documentation that comes with your FreeType source package (it normally involves changing one configuration macro).

I want sexy mac os x fonts on linux too. I was close to getting them yesterday, the problem is as always... if you set the settings based on a certain fonts, there will be fonts that will look like crap anyway,it's not "uniform".

But I'm kinda off topic since we're talking about windows

I meant that the fonts are moddified to look anti-aliased without using any render feature in Windows. Like when you use Bitstream Vera on Windows. Without using any type of render it still looks anti-aliased. With anti-aliased I mean that the font has smooth edges.

post-17647-1213628832_thumb.png

If it's not a Bitmap font, it's a Vector font, if it's a Vector font and it doesn't have smooth edges it was because it was designed that way.

anti-aliasing has nothing to do with the font (apart from the font can say at what sizes it should be anti-aliased, which can be overridden by the renderer anyway), it's entirely in the realm of the renderer.

This makes Windows look like Gnome rendering. I only wish this worked on x64 :(

Same :(

If the source code is available, surely someone with the knowledge can create a 64 bit compatible version, no?

Ran this on Vista x64, works within firefox, but obviously not within Vista itself.

  • 1 month later...

Ok, I've had a quick look at the code. To my surprise, the code is actually rather good and the hooks are done using Microsoft's own detour hooking library, now here's the good news; Microsoft Detours is x64 compliant, so simply compiling under x64 should suffice. There is bad news however, only the professional copy of the Detours library will compile under x64. So unless somebody who has a copy of the library it's highly unlikely we'll get a x64 copy any time soon.

Edited by x0r

Sorry for double posting, but does anyone knows how to make the GDI++ to start automatically at Windows startup? I did make it the program to start as I login to Windows, but it is not active when the program is started. I will need to right click the icon and activate it from there. Or there is a time delay before the thing works after being launched?

Sorry for double posting, but does anyone knows how to make the GDI++ to start automatically at Windows startup? I did make it the program to start as I login to Windows, but it is not active when the program is started. I will need to right click the icon and activate it from there. Or there is a time delay before the thing works after being launched?

i found out how

right click on the shortcut u have in the start up folder and go to the target tab

it should say

X:\GDI++\gditray.exe "-on"

it automaticlly skins the fonts on login

Ok, I've had a quick look at the code. To my surprise, the code is actually rather good and the hooks are done using Microsoft's own detour hooking library, now here's the good news; Microsoft Detours is x64 compliant, so simply compiling under x64 should suffice. There is bad news however, only the professional copy of the Detours library will compile under x64. So unless somebody who has a copy of the library it's highly unlikely we'll get a x64 copy any time soon.

I wonder if this might be useful? http://ntcore.com/Files/nthookengine.htm

  • 2 months later...
Hi all,

This is what I meant.

Please advise.

Thanks.

gdied5.th.jpg

I've been getting the same sort of problems when I'm trying to substitute fonts.

But it's strange, cause the [FontSubstitutes] works fine for settings like Segoe UI=Lucida Grande

but not Arial=Helvetica 55 Roman, which makes all the arial text jumbled like the screenshot above.

same thing when trying to replace my ugly system korean fonts,

any of these eng/kor fontname variations

굴림=맑은 고딕/ 굴림=Malgun Gothic/ Gulim=Malgun Gothic/ Gulim=맑은 고딕

would make the text get scrambled.

Some other korean people on the web seem to get it work correctly, but i don't know why it's not working for me :(

I wonder if this might be useful? http://ntcore.com/Files/nthookengine.htm

And about GDI++ on 64-bit..

yea after reading some of the previous posts It looks like the assumption that only 32-bit apps are hooked is correct.

I'm using Vista x64, and IE 32-bit gets smooth fonts all right but not the 64-bit IE.

windows shell and Sidebar doesn't get smooth fonts either.

Strange thing is, apps like Notepad sometimes gets hooked and sometimes not.

And I noticed that when more than one notepads are open, only one of em is font-smoothed.

a single explorer window very randomly seems to get hooked but not all of them again.

@_@ My heads hurt..

PS: my current setting:

[General]
Name=H1/A2/L2/OD1-Kimatg20081018
Icon=%systemroot%\system32\shell32.dll,-155

HookChildProcesses=1
HintingMode=1
AntiAliasMode=2
MaxHeight=0
WidthMode=0
FontLoader=0
GammaMode=0
GammaValue=1.3
RenderWeight=1.0
Contrast=1.0
TextTuning=0
TextTuningR=-1
TextTuningG=-1
TextTuningB=-1
NormalWeight=6
BoldWeight=6
ItalicSlant=0
LcdFilter=2
LoadOnDemand=1
CacheMaxFaces=16
CacheMaxSizes=16
CacheMaxBytes=5242880
FontSubstitutes=2
UseMapping=1
FontLink=0
BolderMode=0

[Individual]

[Exclude]
Marlett


[ExcludeModule]
photoshop.exe
gom.exe
gomencmain.exe
msnmsgr.exe

[FontSubstitutes]
"Segoe UI"="Lucida Grande"

+and screenshot

post-161291-1224302947_thumb.png

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • According to Microsoft, Cause: One of the drivers controlling the device notified the operating system that the device failed in some manner.   https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/error-codes-in-device-manager-in-windows-524e9e89-4dee-8883-0afa-6bca0456324e
    • This looks awesome, I will request access via Steam later this afternoon!
    • Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!