Recommended Posts

Yea, I watched it last weekend. While it was a good Stargate episode, the writing made me sick. They took advantage of the Sci-Fi aspect way to much, not to mention killed off a lot of the improvements SG-1 had worked towards. There were so many plot holes that they just bandaged up with the whole, hey, its stargate, sure that's possible. Instead of wasting half the season with fillers they could have been writing episodes that would fill in these blanks in the finale. Showing McKay working on his worm drive would be a great episode, hell it would be a great scene just for a few minutes. That way we wouldn't be wonder where the **** that came from in the finale. Also killing General Hammond character? Was that really necessary?

I really hope Universe is a complete 180 when it comes to writing because if its anything like these last few, I won't be tuning in.

That I didn't know, but even still. It's not like we were going to run into him on that final episode..

It was a tribute to the person that played the character, who died suddenly of an unexpected hart attack. It was probably the one thing I liked most about the episode.

It was a tribute to the person that played the character, who died suddenly of an unexpected hart attack. It was probably the one thing I liked most about the episode.

i agree, I quite liked that he was mentioned, I thought it was a very fitting tribute to such a great actor/character

Just watched the finale tonight on Sky1. To be honest it could have been better, it felt somewhat rushed - I think they could have at least squeezed everything into a two hour/part special!

I watched by the magic of the web, I can't stand sky1 with all the ad breaks.

  • 9 months later...

Hey

Sorry to jump in so late...

Over the last few weeks, I watched all of Stargate Atlantis. I had previously watched season 1 but slipped. Seasons 3 and 4 got pretty good with some decent story arcs, but by season 5 I was reading synopsises online and picking which episodes sounded worthy.

I kinda liked the idea behind the "Las Vegas" episode, bit of fun...

But then the finale - what a joke! Everything just seemed to fall into their laps. Let's invent a new unheard of and ultimately not possible technology to use as a plot device to simply wrap things up really quickly. Possibly one of the worst finale's I have watched.

And yes, I know I admitted to chopping the seasons up and only watching the episodes that were of interest but...

What happened to Michael? The last episode I saw of him was the one where a puddlejumper was cloaked in the Hive ship, which mysteriously disappeared. We know Michael knew the team were aboard. It can be assumed he escaped in it, but is this continued?

And yes, I know I admitted to chopping the seasons up and only watching the episodes that were of interest but...

What happened to Michael? The last episode I saw of him was the one where a puddlejumper was cloaked in the Hive ship, which mysteriously disappeared. We know Michael knew the team were aboard. It can be assumed he escaped in it, but is this continued?

He got killed, 14th episode of the 5th season.

It really fell apart quickly in the end. Shame, but the early seasons are still good so we can be thankful for that :) I really hated the Michael story arc. The Todd one was better but still pretty weak. SG1 was equally bad when they created the Ori.

I dunno I just re-watched Camelot the other day (the S9 SG-1 finale) and man the last 9 minutes of the show were just jaw dropping.

Seriously, we get an awesome 7 minute or so long battle with the Ori ships that just OBLITERATE them (including the Asguard ouchies). That's some sweet SFX and action right there folks lol plus it was the perfect cliff hanger leading into S10.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Also known for https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jan/29/adware-internet.   Regards, Aryeh Goretsky    
    • Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!