Recommended Posts

Lets say that you have an AD server, and your My Documents are redirected to a share on the server. Would you like Windows to prompt you with a username/password every time you accessed your My Documents? And lets not forget how much that directory is actually accessed behind the scenes. This is a very common practice, and it most certainly makes since that your username and password are passed automatically. Even if you don't have an AD in place, this would be the same process, it would still make perfect sense that your current username and password are tried first and if not successful, it prompts for credentials that are. It is not a big deal that Windows handles autherntication differently than other OSes. Every OS will do it differently, that is the point of being a different OS. The Windows implementation makes perfect sense in how it is used.

I'm not a complete genius when it comes to understanding file sharing either but when I try and access my computer from say my home computer on the same network I have to type in the user name and password and then yes I have access to all files and what have you. But without that I don't have access to ****. Why the hell do you have Guest enabled anyways? Plus there should be an admin password even if you don't use it. When you choose the option to share files within vista it even TELLS YOU DO YOU WANT TO ENABLE USERNAME AND PASSWORD .. are you just paranoid?

username and password first line of defense?

I wonder why Windows file share is so dumb. Why not show me a list of computers in the LAN and/or a list of users in every PC, with a box of yes or not for sharing and permissions for everyone, in a easy and 100% secure way? Someone with 1 month of programming studies could program this?

So, if this is the way Windows file sharing works, I won't share a thing now.

BTW, I still don't know why I cannot access the folder with a computer with same user/pass.

Any third party software for advanced and secure file sharing in a LAN? I am interested.

Lets say that you have an AD server, and your My Documents are redirected to a share on the server. Would you like Windows to prompt you with a username/password every time you accessed your My Documents? And lets not forget how much that directory is actually accessed behind the scenes. This is a very common practice, and it most certainly makes since that your username and password are passed automatically. Even if you don't have an AD in place, this would be the same process, it would still make perfect sense that your current username and password are tried first and if not successful, it prompts for credentials that are. It is not a big deal that Windows handles autherntication differently than other OSes. Every OS will do it differently, that is the point of being a different OS. The Windows implementation makes perfect sense in how it is used.

AD behaves differently. I'm talking about flat SMB protocol on a peer to peer network. If with AD when you log in on a computer the credentials are not checked locally but remotely (the AD server), that session already belongs to the domain/AD, so if those credentials are "passed through" when other resources inside the domain prompt for credentials, then it would make sense. I dont know how AD works anyway, so I could be 200% wrong.

I wonder why Windows file share is so dumb. Why not show me a list of computers in the LAN and/or a list of users in every PC, with a box of yes or not for sharing and permissions for everyone, in a easy and 100% secure way? Someone with 1 month of programming studies could program this?

So, if this is the way Windows file sharing works, I won't share a thing now.

BTW, I still don't know why I cannot access the folder with a computer with same user/pass.

Any third party software for advanced and secure file sharing in a LAN? I am interested.

For a list of users with nice little check boxes there's a tab labeled "Security" on whatever folder you want to edit the security for. You can add and remove users using this and allow or deny access.

AD behaves differently. I'm talking about flat SMB protocol on a peer to peer network. If with AD when you log in on a computer the credentials are not checked locally but remotely (the AD server), that session already belongs to the domain/AD, so if those credentials are "passed through" when other resources inside the domain prompt for credentials, then it would make sense. I dont know how AD works anyway, so I could be 200% wrong.

Yes AD works differently, but adding the same username and password to every PC is essentially trying to emulate the same centralized security.

...Even if you don't have an AD in place, this would be the same process...
in a easy and 100% secure way?

So, if this is the way Windows file sharing works, I won't share a thing now.

And how is having to have a valid username and password to access a share not secure??

If you do not feel a username and password is secure enough -- then force ipsec with certificates to talk to your machine :rolleyes:

Windows presenting the current credentials of the user to the machine that the user tried to access is not secure HOW?? How is the OS doing for the user less secure than the user typing it in????

It's not the fact that one has to type the credentials that bother me, it's the fact they have to be those credentials. The whole "having the same username/password" on all computers, that's not the norm. On p2p networks the norm is probably for every computer to have whatever users they want, so technically, more often than not windows will deal with having to provide credentials than having the local ones working remotely. I have 7 computers on my home network and only the two that are mine have the same username/password, the others may have my account but with a different password.

This things are 'surfacing' because vista works like it should and the anonymous access is disabled by default. Even if it is described, widely known, and all that, it sounds more like an 'easy hack' to mimic AD behaviour rather than something that should affect regular usage. Sure, instead of having a centralized AD server, let's just clone all the credentials on all computers and voila!

THe only thing I would like to see in the vista network and sharing centre is the ability to change the "sharing and discovery" preferences on an interface basis, rather than changing the preferences on all interfaces that have SMB enabled.

I wonder why Windows file share is so dumb. Why not show me a list of computers in the LAN and/or a list of users in every PC, with a box of yes or not for sharing and permissions for everyone, in a easy and 100% secure way? Someone with 1 month of programming studies could program this?

So, if this is the way Windows file sharing works, I won't share a thing now.

BTW, I still don't know why I cannot access the folder with a computer with same user/pass.

Any third party software for advanced and secure file sharing in a LAN? I am interested.

Windows provides all of the tools you need to set up file sharing effectively: Group Policy, The "Shares" portion of Computer Mangment, the Network Center, and the security/share settings on an individual resource.

THe only thing I would like to see in the vista network and sharing centre is the ability to change the "sharing and discovery" preferences on an interface basis, rather than changing the preferences on all interfaces that have SMB enabled.

You can change such settings on a network-type basis. (ie: Public networks can have sharing Disabled, while Private has them enabled) and then alter the type of each network you're connected to accordingly.

It's not the fact that one has to type the credentials that bother me, it's the fact they have to be those credentials. The whole "having the same username/password" on all computers,
Who ever said they "HAVE" to be the same?????

As long as you auth to the machine with valid account on the machine you can gain access -- there is nothing saying that it has to be the logged in account on machine B..

Its just easier for users to set it up that way.. Nobody ever said it only works that way.

As long as you know an account and password on Machine A, you can auth as that account.. You do not have to have an account with the same username or password on machine B or even logged in.. Ie you could be logged in as billy on machine B and auth as susan to machine A

Nobody ever said that accounts HAD to be the same on each machine.

If if you try to access machine A from machine B and the current account does not match up with an account on machine A or the passwords do no match -- then you will be prompted. Only if you have authed to the machine as some other account, do you run into problems.. Ie if you have a session open as guest to the machine.. you can not also auth as Billy -- you would have to kill your guest session first before you can auth as another user. You can only ever have 1 session open between machines as ONE account.

You can auth to the machine with the gui prompts, or just do it from the command line

net use \\machine\ipc$ /u:machine\username password

or map a drive

net use * \\machinename\share /u:machine\username password

etc.. etc..

Again your seeing issues and bugs and concerns in something you clearly do not understand.

edit: Nor did anyone state that creating the same usernames and passwords on machine would be a replacement for a central userbase? For starters that would be a NIGHTMARE to manage password changes on..

Creating the same username and password on multiple machines is a OK method for "HOME" networks -- or very SMALL mom and pop type shops.. But it would not be a valid method in a real world business network.

Ie I create a budman account on my kids machines with the same password I use on my machine -- just so I do not have to worry about authing to the machines, and that I will have full admin rights, etc. That does not mean you would use the same method on anything other than a home/private network of a few machines.

Edited by BudMan

Can someone answer my question earlier about the guest thingy, when i shared my folder D:\Music on my hard drive i hit share, then continue right and comes up with users Matthew my name was already in there, i added 1 called Guest it was already readable and hit share and it shared, when people access on other pc it accesses as readable, did i share it correctly? i just not sure how to share properly in vista yet, but it works for xp pc, i aint tried my bros vista pc to connect to it yet but xp just logs in auto with readable.

Also the user Matthew on the share, does that mean if i login with the user matthew on other pcs i will get full permission, because i don't want that should i disable the matthew account so there is no way to get full permission on any other pc and just Guest as readable which seems to work, right?

So you shared it with permissions of GUEST having read permissions, and Matthew with Full?

As to users logging in with matthew on other machines -- Do these other matthew accounts have the same exact password as your machines matthew account? Blank is not a password BTW.

Yes if users know/access your machine with an account -- they will have whatever rights that account has.

I setup an account Guest as readable and Matthew full, accounts have no password set on my pc where im sharing the folder, if i logon to my dads pc which is named \\DADSPC on the network and logon account Dad and go to the share it loads up with no user/pass and just comes up with readable permission only.

Im not sure if i set this up correct, basically all i want to do is set it so all the pcs on my network can access the share with read only permission, i can access the share from my pc and edit anything i wish as i just go to the folder im sharing on my pc.

Just not sure if i set it up right?

if your matthew account your machine has no password -- then they can not auth as that account.

if you do not want to be able to use different accounts for different permissions to shares -- then just use simple file sharing! All remote access is limited to GUEST then.

  • 2 weeks later...

Mmm, let me add an update to this post.

Well, about the computer not being able to access the shared files, the problem is this one:

HERE

The problem is even when I change the user name to the one with permissions, that name is a fake, so the original account name is always the same (for example, in Documents and Settings) // and I DON'T want to make a new accounts (even when this actually works).

So, I don't know a way to REALLY change the account name, that's the thing I really want, anyone knows how?

Edited by NeHoMaR
Mmm, let me add an update to this post.

Well, about the computer not being able to access the shared files, the problem is this one:

HERE

The problem is even when I change the user name to the one with permissions, that name is a fake, so the original account name is always the same (for example, in Documents and Settings) // and I DON'T want to make a new accounts (even when this actually works).

So, I don't know a way to REALLY change the account name, that's the thing I really want, anyone knows how?

Read the article.

STATUS

This behavior is by design. The Welcome screen displays the Full name field of the user account, not the actual account name.

You cannot change the logon name, only the display name. You need to do it right the first time, and if you screwed up, you need to do it over. You live and learn.

Who said you can not change the logon/username?

Sure if your using that lame ass user manager in control panel.. then yeah using the change name "red arrow" only changes the full name listed on on the account. And the not the actual username/logon name.

but if you right click on computer and say manage, users then you can change the actual username. Or if you use run control userpasswords2 -- blue arrows.

post-14624-1213894455_thumb.jpg

Who said you can not change the logon/username?

but if you right click on computer and say manage, users then you can change the actual username. Or if you use run control userpasswords2

Just tested that in a virtual machine (vmware) and you can change the user, but then show a horrible error message at logon screen and Documents and Settings, etc., keep old name.

Creating a new account completely destroyed Windows logon to the point of being impossible to login at all, thanks of God this is just a virtual machine.

I have no idea what you did -- but changing the user name is not an issue.. And creating a New Account sure and and the F should not be a problem.

Sounds like you have something really jacked up even in your virtual machine ;) Is this some kind of nlighted install or something?

I assure you there is not a problem with changing the username. If using cntrl+alt+delete to login there clearly is not an issue, but since I am pretty sure you using the welcome screen. So here I did a quick verification.. I change the name, and then logged in and added a new users, etc. No issues. Do not even have to reboot.

Here is before change

post-14624-1213899858.jpg

Here I changed it username and fullname

post-14624-1213899880.jpg

here I added another account

post-14624-1213899871.jpg

We change usernames ALL the time.. Matter of fact I have to change 433 names here pretty soon in one location, because the username does not match up with email address. And this will be the new standard before we merge a bunch of our domains into one, etc.

Changing user names is no big deal -- what you did I have no freaking idea.. But I assure you changing username is something I do on an almost daily basis, and is a built in functionality of windows - not some hack or anything. Click Click username changed!

edit: here I did it vista as well.. There is NO ISSUES with changing username or adding users -- I have no idea wtf you might have done wrong.. this is a click click done sort of thing..

orig vista

post-14624-1213900932.jpg

renamed vista account with lots more users

post-14624-1213900941.jpg

What did you do exactly????

Edited by BudMan

Ok, thanks, I was finally able to access the shared folder with an account originally created with a different name. But, the name in Documents and Settings doesn't change, it's normal? Look like it continue working even with different name.

The problem posted above was because I was testing with a "light" version of Windows (Windows modified for use less RAM), and I imagine something needed for this was missed. This time I tested with a full untouched SP3 Windows XP.

I am really starting to understand the way Windows share. I don't like it, but is good to know.

And what exactly do you not like about how windows shares??? How would you suggest it be done better??
Too many things. IMO, Windows look like a very old software patched too many times. They just add and add things and keep the old ones, so they end with a Windows with 3 or 4 utilities for change your user name, 2 or 3 different places where you can change sharing rules, etc. Maybe they are adding another additional window for manage sharing in Windows 7? for the love of God!

If they make a real new Windows, they could make the sharing/permissions/security thing in just one unique window doing the job from newbie to advanced user in a very easy and useful way. This will also make Windows lightweight.

What does the method used to change a username have to do with how window does file shares?

There are multiple ways to change a username in linux and os x as well.

Seems like doing it in OS X is a way more complicated than in windows ;)

---

http://www.macworld.com/article/132693/200...rtusername.html

One of the most-frequently-asked questions about Mac OS X is “How do I change my short username?” While it's easy to change your full username—an easily-accessible setting in Accounts preferences—the short username, which is also the name of your home folder in the Finder, seems set in stone (or in silicon, if you will).

And in previous versions of Mac OS X, that was nearly the case: changing your short username was a complicated—and risky—procedure. In fact, it was so complex that even Apple’s own instructions weren’t exhaustive. (Because of this, a colleague and I wrote a special utility for pre-Leopard versions of OS X, ChangeShortName, that did the job right.) But in Leopard, Apple has finally given users a reasonably-simple way to change the short username, and it's located right in System Preferences—assuming you know where to look. Even better, you have three options, of varying levels of complexity and risk, for making the change; all three are considerably safer than the unauthorized procedures you had to use in the past.

---

Options are GOOD!! Forcing or limiting 1 way to do something is BAD. And removing the old ways BREAK things for starters.. Ie if you rewrote the sharing protocols.. Now older versions of the OS would not be able to share files with the new version, etc.. etc..

If you do not like windows -- here's a hint, don't use it.. There are other options to be sure -- but more than likely you will find stuff you do not like, or feel could be done better with all of them, there is a learning curve on how something is done with each system. And with change often comes frustration, if you are use to doing it a different way, etc.

have a go at NFS if you do not like SMB ;)

---

https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SettingUpNFSHowTo

BTW

NFS user permissions are based on user ID (UID). UIDs of any users on the client must match those on the server in order for the users to have access. The typical ways of doing this are:

* Manual password file synchronization

* Use of LDAP

* Use of NIS

---

Your going to find people complaining no matter what your using to share files.

---

http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1197971

Topic : File permissions/users/sharing permissions appear broken

There is obviously (to me anyway) a problem with this whole area which has been introduced with Leopard which Apple needs to fix ASAP.

---

Too many things. IMO, Windows look like a very old software patched too many times. They just add and add things and keep the old ones, so they end with a Windows with 3 or 4 utilities for change your user name, 2 or 3 different places where you can change sharing rules, etc. Maybe they are adding another additional window for manage sharing in Windows 7? for the love of God!

If they make a real new Windows, they could make the sharing/permissions/security thing in just one unique window doing the job from newbie to advanced user in a very easy and useful way. This will also make Windows lightweight.

I really hate to say this, but with the last comment it's looking to me to be more of a bassackwards way of entering into one of those "Windoz Sux" threads...and I sincerely hope I'm wrong; those threads generate way too much heat with very little light given off.

As far as networking with Windows goes: it's been that way since Windows For Workgroups 3.11, the *NIX world has adopted it through SMB / Samba, and nearly every other network-aware OS or Server OS works the same way - heck, before WfW, NetWare 2.11 worked the same way; once you provided authentication / credentials to the network, you were allowed access to any other directory / folder / mount point where your credentials match the ACL for that object. ACLs just work that way, folks - get used to it, because it's not going to change much in the foreseable future.

--ScottKin

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
    • [Price Drop] PDF Expert for Mac v3 is still half off by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time you can save 42% on PDF Expert One-Time Purchase. PDFs remain the best way to transmit documents, but editing them isn't possible with standard Mac software. PDF Expert changes that, allowing you to edit PDF text, images, links, and outlines quickly and easily. Typo in a contract? Easy fix. Need to rework a complete section of a document? No problem. PDF Expert provides a series of essential functions that will transform the way you work with documents on your Mac. It recognizes text and OCR, makes edits, and fills out forms. And with the “Enhance” feature powered by AI, it will fix distortions, remove shadows and improve contrast so that even difficult-to-read documents look great. EDIT Change the text. Easily fix typos, update numbers, or add entire paragraphs Insert images. Update logos in a contract or add a new graph to a report Add links. Enrich your PDFs by linking to other pages or external websites ANNOTATE Highlight the important. Make the most valuable content stand out at a glance Comment on PDFs. Add text to PDFs, insert pop-up notes & write your thoughts in the margins Add stamps. Review documents with our set of stamps or create custom stamps for any workflow ORGANIZE Merge PDFs. Combine multiple files into one PDF document Manage pages. Add, delete, rearrange, or rotate PDF pages with ease Split PDFs. Extract pages from PDFs & save them as separate files CONVERT Convert to PDF. Turn JPG, PNG, Word, PPT, and Excel to PDF PDF to Word. Convert PDFs into editable Word documents PDF to image. Turn PDFs into JPG or PNG images PDF to Excel. Convert PDFs into Excel spreadsheets PDF to PPT. Save PDFs as PowerPoint presentations PDF to text. Convert PDFs into editable TXT files FILL OUT Fill out PDF forms. Easily fill out PDF forms by just clicking on them Sign documents. Add your signature to a PDF in a few clicks. Let customers sign documents with handy one-time signatures Redact PDFs. Blackout or erase confidential information from your documents RECOGNIZE TEXT OCR text in PDF. Recognize the text, so you can search, highlight & copy it Enhance scans. Fix distortions, remove shadows & improve contrast Crop & split pages. Split double-page scans into separate pages & remove undesired margins Good to know: Length of access: Lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Mac Max number of device(s): Unlimited usage on personal macOS devices Version: PDF Expert 3 for Mac (macOS) Updates: Get continuous support and bug fixes. Additional new features may come at an extra cost. PDF Expert One-Time Purchase normally costs $139.99, but you can pick it up for just $69.97 for a limited time, that represents a saving of $70 (50% off). For a full description, specs, and license info, click the link below. Deal Price One time cost now only $69.97 (was $139.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!