Why are Mac's preferred for graphic design?


Recommended Posts

Dont really have to jump back and forth by minimizing and maximizing if you use alt+tab or WinKey + tab in Vista.

True true, but on the Mac you could:

Alt+Tab, Expos? (show all/current application windows), hide applications, minimize them to the dock, manage windows via Spaces (virtual desktops). It's great, because everyone works differently...

Dont really have to jump back and forth by minimizing and maximizing if you use alt+tab or WinKey + tab in Vista.

I don't believe flip3d was really meant to be a serious app switcher.

Steve has some great points but he's missing one: CMD+` (for cycling through an application's windows)

If I ever had a large number of apps open, I'd just use Switcher - Winkey+`, then type in a few letters of the title. Incremental filtering of open windows = amazing.

Besides, I never have that many apps open at once - primarily because I am more of a single-focus kind of person. Yes, I may have Premiere CS3 rendering something in the background while I'm playing music and surfing the web, but that's about the extent of it.

Oh, and apps open so fast in Vista, I don't really need a "quicklook" feature - photoshop launches almost in an instant, and don't get me going at how fast lighter apps launch. It's about as instant as they come.

Dont really have to jump back and forth by minimizing and maximizing if you use alt+tab or WinKey + tab in Vista.

True if you have your hand on the keyboard on those keys. It takes time to take your hand and put it on those keys then cycle through one by one.

I've set expose to the screen corners so all i have to do is move my mouse to the bottom left, shows me all my apps, then i click the one I want. Literally takes 1 second and I only use one hand.

If I ever had a large number of apps open, I'd just use Switcher - Winkey+`, then type in a few letters of the title. Incremental filtering of open windows = amazing.

Besides, I never have that many apps open at once - primarily because I am more of a single-focus kind of person. Yes, I may have Premiere CS3 rendering something in the background while I'm playing music and surfing the web, but that's about the extent of it.

Oh, and apps open so fast in Vista, I don't really need a "quicklook" feature - photoshop launches almost in an instant, and don't get me going at how fast lighter apps launch. It's about as instant as they come.

I'm assuming you have some good computer specs. Things can always get faster with speedier systems but that's not to say that it's not handy to have the feature. (Regardless, we're not all working with fast computers)

Quick Look becomes handy because it's as simple as a space bar to open and close for almost any file type. The fact that there is no "application" to open or navigate around is part of its brilliance--integration is always good. It handles amazingly well no matter how large the file types I work with. (usually large tiff and cr2).

Given that, it goes beyond just the viewer and handles as a browser as well with the arrow keys and index view. I'm sure opening/closing applications to view files is fine for you--but honestly I can't tell you how much simpler and quicker my workflow has been with it when I don't have to launch Lightroom when I want to browse through my library, Pages to quickly view one of my documents, or Keynote to quickly see a specific page from a presentation I'm working on.

These are all just a few examples from my own daily workflow on where Quick Look excels. Give it a try. ;)

I'm assuming you have some good computer specs. Things can always get faster with speedier systems but that's not to say that it's not handy to have the feature. (Regardless, we're not all working with fast computers)

Quick Look becomes handy because it's as simple as a space bar to open and close for almost any file type. The fact that there is no "application" to open or navigate around is part of its brilliance--integration is always good. It handles amazingly well no matter how large the file types I work with. (usually large tiff and cr2).

Given that, it goes beyond just the viewer and handles as a browser as well with the arrow keys and index view. I'm sure opening/closing applications to view files is fine for you--but honestly I can't tell you how much simpler and quicker my workflow has been with it when I don't have to launch Lightroom when I want to browse through my library, Pages to quickly view one of my documents, or Keynote to quickly see a specific page from a presentation I'm working on.

These are all just a few examples from my own daily workflow on where Quick Look excels. Give it a try. ;)

I completely blanked on this - there is a preview pane in Vista that opens on the right side of Explorer. It previews virtually any picture, word document (copy/paste works), pdf, video, and anything with a preview handler installed for it. That's even more quick and unobtrusive than QuickLook, as it doesn't block whatever file list you are currently viewing.

I guess I really don't see the benefit - all the tiny thumbnails work fine for me when I want to browse hundreds of pictures, and if I want to open one of them, then it only takes an instant to open it in whatever app I want. If I wanted to open a PowerPoint presentation, I guess I just don't see the benefit of not opening it in PowerPoint - it takes practically the same time as opening QuickLook, and I have the full editing features available if I need to make a change.

I completely blanked on this - there is a preview pane in Vista that opens on the right side of Explorer. It previews virtually any picture, word document (copy/paste works), pdf, video, and anything with a preview handler installed for it. That's even more quick and unobtrusive than QuickLook, as it doesn't block whatever file list you are currently viewing.

The preview pane in Vista would be comparable to Cover Flow view or Column View preview, not Quick Look.

That's perfectly fine if you want it integrated within the explorer, but my own preferences would be a separate window (HUD panel in Leopard) where one can have as large a view of the contents as they want. (The gist of Quick Look is to mimic the main purpose of the application--but without actually opening the file and thus in a speedy manner) This plays particular importance for large videos and images.

Though I will give you that the copy/paste feature is handy. That's a feature that would be nice to have [which isn't present in Quick Look]. ;)

I guess I really don't see the benefit - all the tiny thumbnails work fine for me when I want to browse hundreds of pictures, and if I want to open one of them, then it only takes an instant to open it in whatever app I want. If I wanted to open a PowerPoint presentation, I guess I just don't see the benefit of not opening it in PowerPoint - it takes practically the same time as opening QuickLook, and I have the full editing features available if I need to make a change.

I was the same at first and thought of it only as a "side" feature but it really has become one of those things that's just second nature to use now for small little things in your workflow. If i'm skimming through my large list of presentations or documents I've worked on and am just looking for a particular reference, opening Keynote just to find that small reference isn't very feasbile. (at least for my patience).

If I have several PDFs that are named oddly from one particular company that I'm looking for, opening them all up (which would then lead to a crowded taskbar) just seems "wrong". A simple spacebar press and then scrolling through each PDF with the arrow keys is all that it takes.

You really have to use it to "get it". ;)

I have one reason and a very important one:

Color management, color quality and slower profile degradation.

Specially for people like me who design works that will be printed or do photography even on a windows calibrated system. Honestly I would ever go back to Windows to do design or photoprocessing.

Cmd+H if Adobe would stop being stupid and just make it like every other app in OS X.

That's probably my biggest complain from CS3 :p

It stems back to the days before OS X where CMD+H wasn't standard. You can change it to the proper shortcut in the application preferences.

Yes, I have.

But now that it IS standard, they should make it standard.

I can't change any settings on any of the Mac Pros at school, so I'm stuck with Cmd+Alt+H.

It's not THAT big of a deal, just an annoyance.

Have a talk with your sys admin. :p

Again, that would be replicated via the Finder's own viewing options though...

That really doesn't do the preview window in Vista justice - it can view way more filetypes, and, unless the preview pane is available in another view, is not nearly as cluttered. In fact, on a 1920/1200 screen, a large preview pane fills up right space perfectly.

@giga

If I want to hunt for a word/phrase in my documents folder, I simply go up to the search bar on the upper right, type in the phrase, and let it filter the results. By default, it just filters the files in that particular folder and the subfolders. It searches the text in documents/PowerPoint presentations, etc., as well as the file name.

Or, I can click a column header and filter by any number of criteria. Much faster than jumping from document to document.

That really doesn't do the preview window in Vista justice - it can view way more filetypes, and, unless the preview pane is available in another view, is not nearly as cluttered. In fact, on a 1920/1200 screen, a large preview pane fills up right space perfectly.

@giga

If I want to hunt for a word/phrase in my documents folder, I simply go up to the search bar on the upper right, type in the phrase, and let it filter the results. By default, it just filters the files in that particular folder and the subfolders. It searches the text in documents/PowerPoint presentations, etc., as well as the file name.

Or, I can click a column header and filter by any number of criteria. Much faster than jumping from document to document.

Can you show me what you mean? I'm confused...

That really doesn't do the preview window in Vista justice - it can view way more filetypes, and, unless the preview pane is available in another view, is not nearly as cluttered. In fact, on a 1920/1200 screen, a large preview pane fills up right space perfectly.

@giga

If I want to hunt for a word/phrase in my documents folder, I simply go up to the search bar on the upper right, type in the phrase, and let it filter the results. By default, it just filters the files in that particular folder and the subfolders. It searches the text in documents/PowerPoint presentations, etc., as well as the file name.

Or, I can click a column header and filter by any number of criteria. Much faster than jumping from document to document.

What filetypes does Finder not view?

The searching within documents from the search bar is also available in Finder, but I practically don't use it as much. I can sometimes have various words or phrases in multiple documents and they'd all show up. (of course boolean searches or filters are available, but I just don't find myself using it as much as QL).

i have to seriously disagree with anyone that thinks the experience between the two platforms is the same. i have used windows basically all my life and only got a MBP a couple of months ago.

night and day.

i am also a graphic designer and use adobe suite heavily. i have to say im not a tech person, but its just somethign about the way osx handles memory i dont know... its efficient. my machine never hangs. ive never experienced a crash in an adobe app like i frequently did in windows xp (even with sp2 and all the patches installed). and i work on huge huge files.

I've been into graphics and web design for a number of years and have done most of my work on the PC platform. I never hated it or thought it was that bad, yeah I've had enormous amount of crashes and errors but yeah, nothing that made me throw it out.

Mac is the way of the future of design! :p

I have found that OS X encourages creativity with it's bundled apps and the apps available. They are made to be intuitive and be easy so you can focus what your are trying to create rather than learning the program.

We were doing our podcast in Adobe Audition 3.0 on my PC, which was great for sound but Garageband + Podcasting is made for podcasting and works extremely well. Cut down podcast recording process to 2 steps instead of the 5 or more from before.

I have one reason and a very important one:

Color management, color quality and slower profile degradation.

Specially for people like me who design works that will be printed or do photography even on a windows calibrated system. Honestly I would ever go back to Windows to do design or photoprocessing.

This is what my co-workers tell me, so I'd have to agree. It has nothing to do with usability, the 'experience', nor does it have anything to do with the systems used previously. I'm told that if it did, they'd still go Windows as the cost for a Mac doesn't justify any of those things.

They color-correct photos for the largest newspaper publisher in the US, so I tend to believe them. Our department is 100% Mac and I would say the entire company is probably close to 80-90% Mac. Unfortunately the corp IT department largely uses, and is very much in love, with Windows

Edited by Chad

@giga You would know more than me about the previewing in Finder - I've just seen it handle pictures. :p

Can you show me what you mean? I'm confused...

Well...

Here's my very messy download folder (one that I will be cleaning shortly) :

post-194472-1213831700_thumb.jpg

Say I want to find a QuickTime movie I have in there. The below screenshot shows how easy it is to filter by filetype:

post-194472-1213831575_thumb.jpg

Or, let's say I downloaded an nVidia driver yesterday, in an .exe format - the below screenshot shows what happens if I filter by file type and then by date:

post-194472-1213831733_thumb.jpg

And about that preview pane? Here it is previewing a Word document with some text selected:

post-194472-1213832496_thumb.jpg

If it were a choice of QuickLook or the powerful filtering feature, I would choose the filtering feature any day.

Oh, and BTW: The filtering's instant.

i am also a graphic designer and use adobe suite heavily. i have to say im not a tech person, but its just somethign about the way osx handles memory i dont know... its efficient. my machine never hangs. ive never experienced a crash in an adobe app like i frequently did in windows xp (even with sp2 and all the patches installed). and i work on huge huge files.

And of course, if you have a choice between a older, slow PC and a new Mac, guess which one's going to run better? :p I've had friends that have switched from an ancient PC to a new Mac, and have told me how amazingly fast it is.

I've had absolutely no issues handling large files with Adobe's CS3 suite for the PC, with one exception: After Effects. However, that is a result of some poor memory-handling code on Adobe's part, not Microsoft's part. The back-end of After Effect's rendering engine feels hacked and poorly thought out.

I've opened 30K by 30K images in Photoshop with absolutely no problems.

Edited by NateB1

I hate to seem like I am trying to combat you, NateB1, but again this isn't something we're without. Spotlight powers the file index and search, and as such I can do a filtered such within a folder just like you can, though the kind of data I can search by MAY be far greater? Notice the file icon preview, I really could ask for more really - well except pressing space bar to preview the full thing...

See the attachment. I know I did a 'PDF', with 'World' in the title, it had more than '2' pages, and I created it in 'InDesign'... Boom!

- I'd argue that the UI for the Finder here, looks so much simpler than that of Windows Explorer - which looks very busy, that's one thing I find frustrating when I have to jump onto a developers computer.

post-1665-1213832961_thumb.png

post-1665-1213833183_thumb.png

Edited by Steve

I can search the above way in Vista as well - however, it's *much* easier to simply click a column header, check or uncheck different options, and the items are instantly filtered. As far as clutter is concerned, I don't see how it's cluttered at all. I guess it's one of those things you need to see in action to see the benefits of that way. If you noticed the "Group" option, I can group the items by different things, and save them as "saved searches" to come back to them later. Very handy. It's also very useful to see how many files of a certain type/size are in a particular folder.

Oh, and I might add - the filtering options only show types/sizes/etc. that exist in that folder - if there are no Quicktime movies in a folder, for example, that option won't exist to check/uncheck.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glow 26.10 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.10 changelog: New Features The bootstrapping algorithm has been completely redesigned. The software can now launch directly without requiring TS Preloader. As part of this change, the startup splash screen displayed during initialization has been removed. In addition, spikes in CPU usage have been eliminated, resulting in a more stable architecture with significantly lower memory consumption. The Microsoft Office detection infrastructure within the Operating System section has been enhanced. Additional detection support has been added for Office C2R (Click-to-Run) installations. Furthermore, the license status evaluation system has been improved, and the priority order has been revised as follows: Licensed > Grace Period > Other (NOTIFICATIONS, EVALUATION, etc.). Glow now includes preliminary support for Wi-Fi 8 technology, allowing more detailed information to be displayed for Wi-Fi 8-compatible network adapters. Glow now provides full support for Bluetooth 6.2. Adapters supporting Bluetooth 6.2 can be analyzed in greater detail and with improved accuracy. The disk distribution view in the Disk section has been modernized, replacing the traditional table layout with a new 2×2 card-based design. The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to v26.7. Thanks to the new custom controls, all Türkaysoft applications now offer a more modern and consistent user interface aligned with Windows 11 design standards. Bug Fixes Potential line-ending handling issues in the Office detection code within the Operating System section have been resolved. Additionally, the output format has been standardized to UTF-8 to prevent character encoding issues and ensure consistent data processing. Several stability and file management issues within the Debugging infrastructure have been addressed. Problems that prevented new log files from being created after Debugging was disabled, as well as issues causing debug records to be lost, have been fixed. File deletion and reaccess issues that occurred after file locks were released have also been resolved. In addition, a bug that caused newly recreated log files to remain locked after deletion has been eliminated. Unnecessary blank lines within debug logs and the extra empty line that could appear at the end of log files have also been corrected. A shortcut key conflict caused by assigning identical hotkeys to both the DNS Test Tool and the Donation page has been fixed. The DNS Test Tool can now be accessed using CTRL + Shift + D, while the Donation page is available via CTRL + Alt + D. Changes The service responsible for providing the Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider information in the Network section has been updated to use the ipinfo.io infrastructure. This change improves the accuracy and consistency of the displayed data. (No external requests are made while Hiding Mode is enabled.) Some terms in the Dutch and Korean language files have been updated to make them clearer and more user-friendly. [TS Updater] Before the update process begins, users are now prompted to choose whether they would like to view the release notes. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.10 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!