Why are Mac's preferred for graphic design?


Recommended Posts

I can search the above way in Vista as well - however, it's *much* easier to simply click a column header, check or uncheck different options, and the items are instantly filtered. As far as clutter is concerned, I don't see how it's cluttered at all. I guess it's one of those things you need to see in action to see the benefits of that way. If you noticed the "Group" option, I can group the items by different things, and save them as "saved searches" to come back to them later. Very handy. It's also very useful to see how many files of a certain type/size are in a particular folder.

Oh, and I might add - the filtering options only show types/sizes/etc. that exist in that folder - if there are no Quicktime movies in a folder, for example, that option won't exist to check/uncheck.

That does seem pretty simple--kudos to that feature. (Y) In Finder, it's just CMD+F to bring up the filter bar.

Grouping and saving of course are handled through the buttons on the right.

Picture%201.png

...

Edit: @Decryptor: I guess I made an assumption there that I shouldn't have; but I have yet to meet a person who designs and cannot script/code. Perhaps I haven't worked in teams that are large enough to have 'pure' designers.

Yeah, but that doesn't mean they need Windows and Visual Studio unless they're doing something windows related.

I do all my PHP stuff (as simple as it is) in a text editor, it does syntax highlighting and bracket matching, and shows a list of open files on the left where I can switch backwards and forwards.

This is what my co-workers tell me, so I'd have to agree. It has nothing to do with usability, the 'experience', nor does it have anything to do with the systems used previously. I'm told that if it did, they'd still go Windows as the cost for a Mac doesn't justify any of those things.

They color-correct photos for the largest newspaper publisher in the US, so I tend to believe them. Our department is 100% Mac and I would say the entire company is probably close to 80-90% Mac. Unfortunately the corp IT department largely uses, and is very much in love, with Windows

Reading you quoting me made me realize how horribly written was my post, let me clarify:

Even a calibrated system based on windows presents a slight innacuracy comparing the printed material with that you see on your monitor. This innacuracy its unavoidable, doesnt matter what system you use but with OS X (And I might add, thanks to its widely questioned "closed hardware" method) the color management produce more acurate works. That is why that after using an OS X system (Software and hardware) even a calibrated windows one feels like a step backwards.

A very notorius example: I have some scanned photos that I produced in lab. These are b&w examples using a "warm" b&w. In my uncalibrated (Hardware method) macbook pro monitor the scanned pics looks very closely to the original material, yet in the calibrated windows system at my school the scans looks blueish.

To me it seems that they both do the same thing and look different :/

Either way, I just learned about filtering in Finder so thanks.

Yeah - it all evens out at the end, I guess. I prefer the interactive preview pane and quick filtering in Vista, and others prefer QuickLook and the search filtering on OS X..

I guess this is an example of using the strengths of each OS to your advantage.

With that said, I still prefer Vista's method of managing files. :)

Reading you quoting me made me realize how horribly written was my post, let me clarify:

Even a calibrated system based on windows presents a slight innacuracy comparing the printed material with that you see on your monitor. This innacuracy its unavoidable, doesnt matter what system you use but with OS X (And I might add, thanks to its widely questioned "closed hardware" method) the color management produce more acurate works. That is why that after using an OS X system (Software and hardware) even a calibrated windows one feels like a step backwards.

A very notorius example: I have some scanned photos that I produced in lab. These are b&w examples using a "warm" b&w. In my uncalibrated (Hardware method) macbook pro monitor the scanned pics looks very closely to the original material, yet in the calibrated windows system at my school the scans looks blueish.

It depends on how well calibrated the Windows system is. If you use a color calibration system, like Huey or Spyder, on both systems, you should get the exact same color settings, or that color calibration system isn't doing its job properly.

It depends on how well calibrated the Windows system is. If you use a color calibration system, like Huey or Spyder, on both systems, you should get the exact same color settings, or that color calibration system isn't doing its job properly.

Maybe its the second case since a Spyder (first gen) was used on that Windows system.

Unfortunately the corp IT department largely uses, and is very much in love, with Windows

It's called job security. Seriously, Mac's are a LOT less work to maintain and therefore require less people to maintain them. The proof is in companies that have moved to them and now have far less people maintaining the computers.

It's called job security. Seriously, Mac's are a LOT less work to maintain and therefore require less people to maintain them. The proof is in companies that have moved to them and now have far less people maintaining the computers.

...Skipping right on by that troll bait... :whistle:

...Skipping right on by that troll bait... :whistle:

Troll bait? The first sentence is called a "joke." The rest is simply the truth. Research it yourself if you're so inclined. I really don't care if you or anyone else responds either because I probably won't follow the thread. Also, how can this be troll bait in a freaking Apple thread!?

Troll bait? The first sentence is called a "joke." The rest is simply the truth. Research it yourself if you're so inclined. I really don't care if you or anyone else responds either because I probably won't follow the thread. Also, how can this be troll bait in a freaking Apple thread!?

+1

Troll bait? The first sentence is called a "joke." The rest is simply the truth. Research it yourself if you're so inclined. I really don't care if you or anyone else responds either because I probably won't follow the thread. Also, how can this be troll bait in a freaking Apple thread!?

OK. You want me to respond? I'll do so very quickly.

In our large company, we have hundreds of internal win32 apps that we have developed for internal purposes. Every one of our 1500 computers is managed via Active Directory. We have Exchange 2007 running on Vista x64. We have SQL Server 2005 running on a Win2K server. We have a Sharepoint 2007 server that interfaces with the SQL 2005 Server. Now, tell me exactly how you would propose switching everyone to Macs, with no downtime, with our measly budget. Also explain to me why us developers should learn an entire new language, learn an entire new IDE, Xcode, and redevelop all our apps, some of which are very complex and do heavy analysis.

I know our company isn't alone.

I'll be waiting for your response.

Another test: How many webservers are hosted using Xserve? How many are using IIS? How many are using Apache? You'll find the latter two are the ones leading the pack, with Xserve bringing up the very rear. There's a reason for that.

Another test: How many webservers are hosted using Xserve? How many are using IIS? How many are using Apache? You'll find the latter two are the ones leading the pack, with Xserve bringing up the very rear. There's a reason for that.

Just for the record, any stock Xserve which is operating as a Web Server is running Apache...

http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/features/webhosting.html

  • 2 weeks later...

By Vista thumbnail previewer, do you mean this?

24q3kms.png

While similar, Quick Look really isn't comparable as it offers much larger previews (full screen if you want), index pages, slideshows/video playback, support for multi page documents and many file formats. (extensible as well if a format isn't supported)

quicklook_gallery08_20071016.jpg

quicklook_gallery03_20071016.jpg

Once in Photoshop, press F. You can cycle through different window view modes which you can have the background gone if you want.

rvkj10.png

CS4 is actually introducing an even more improved application frame with tabs and better palettes though.

Some research would be nice before making such rash comments. Carbon was introduced by Apple for backwards compatibility when making the switch from Classic. It was far from "stupid", as they're actually very flexible with each other. Cocoa has been pushed by Apple from some time now but Adobe got caught off guard by Leopard's forward push of it. It's no ones "fault"--just happens because it did.

Quality > Quantity. I have yet to really see an Expose the way it's supposed to work as it does in OS X. (the clones mainly mimic the "All Windows" expose. Many don't realize that there is more to expose than just that: individual application expose and show desktop)

Switcher though has been my favorite so far on Vista.

:) Hello, sorry if i post 2x. There's something error with my browser. OK, please correct me if i am wrong, but let me explain:

Yes I agree with all you said, but in fact (it seems you didn't mention it yet) Windows Vista also has a feature called "preview pane" to preview a file without need to open it by any associated application, directly in Its Explorer (To launch: View-Explorer Bar -Preview Pane or Organize-Layout-Preview Pane).

All you need is only select the file and the content preview suddenly appears in same window (the preview pane on right side). It supports almost all filetypes: text, image, document, multimedia audio/video even binaries like zip, exe, dll etc (if supported preview handlers exist). Yes, you can adjust the preview results (e.g. by resizing them larger etc)

In Leopard you have to launch a separated external application (the Quicklook itself by "space bar"), but in Vista, you dont, and never. It's more integrated. Windows Vista Search, Games, and some system file directories also have same feature as well as Explorer.

Vista Preview handlers have/Will have more file preview supports (yeah, we all know Windows "monopoly" for both 3rd party design softwares and sometimes even supports of their filetypes). Remember "AutoCAD"?

Btw, talking about Vista Previewer and Quicklook, previous versions of Windows 2K (Windows 95 and 98) also have a previewer tool called "QuickView" (It's been abandoned in Windows 2K or Xp, dont know why).

The W2K and WebView (active desktop) of pre-Windows Xp also have Webview preview pane (optional) to preview file content as well. Could you see the "similarity" of them?.

I also know about Coverflow ability in Quicklook display, 3d view looks amazing, but In my Opinion, for file and thumbnail previewers, Vista preview pane (as well as its live icon and thumbnail feature) is still more easier and practical than Leopard Quicklook (i dont mean it's better, but again more practical...). That's it.

Thanks and regards-Amirz :)

Edited by AMIRZ
It's not about the OS or even the design tools. It's all about the artist.

http://diamonster.deviantart.com/art/powerdraw-17908194

WOW! :o

On topic, I don't think it matters whether you use a PC or a Mac. It's a personal preference. One thing's for sure, is you look cooler working on a mac, but it really doesn't have any technical advantages anymore.

I always wondered why Apple would be better for graphic design too. My father is a graphic designer and he told me that it has better font handling and it looks closer to the actual print.

I just got into OSX86 since a few days and i love the OS, but i dont think the workflow is better than Windows. Personally i prefer a taskbar over Expose, and Alt-Tab works better on Windows(well at least with browsers). On the other hand, OSX is a lot more stable.

I think it is just a tradition as well. Today the differences are minimal, and Adobe software works more or less the same. Today it is more about the OS than the designer software. OSX is more reliable, but Vista is going the right way with reliability. I like OSX, but i can not see why people would pay twice the price for a mac over a pc. Money wise, i dont understand why a mac is preferred over a pc for graphic design. Windows has enough good font managers, you need security, but total that would be still cheaper than a mac and it gets the job done. Only reason i can think of is the reliability, although the gap between reliability on OSX and Windows is getting smaller i think, and maybe the calibration, maybe the color display is really better on a mac?

I always wondered why Apple would be better for graphic design too. My father is a graphic designer and he told me that it has better font handling and it looks closer to the actual print.

I just got into OSX86 since a few days and i love the OS, but i dont think the workflow is better than Windows. Personally i prefer a taskbar over Expose, and Alt-Tab works better on Windows(well at least with browsers). On the other hand, OSX is a lot more stable.

I think it is just a tradition as well. Today the differences are minimal, and Adobe software works more or less the same. Today it is more about the OS than the designer software. OSX is more reliable, but Vista is going the right way with reliability. I like OSX, but i can not see why people would pay twice the price for a mac over a pc. Money wise, i dont understand why a mac is preferred over a pc for graphic design. Windows has enough good font managers, you need security, but total that would be still cheaper than a mac and it gets the job done. Only reason i can think of is the reliability, although the gap between reliability on OSX and Windows is getting smaller i think, and maybe the calibration, maybe the color display is really better on a mac?

Where are you getting twice the price? :s What's Alt-Tab not doing for you? If you want to switch between different windows in the same application (Safari, Firefox), use CMD+~.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Helium Browser 0.13.4.1 by Razvan Serea Helium is a private, fast, and honest Chromium-based web browser — built for people, with love. It offers the best privacy by default, unbiased ad-blocking, and a clean experience free from bloat and noise. Proudly based on Ungoogled-Chromium, Helium removes Google’s clutter while keeping a fast, efficient development pipeline. With thoughtful touches like native !bangs and split view, Helium is a people-first, fully open-source browser that puts control back in your hands. Privacy, security, and control come first. Ads, trackers, and third-party cookies are blocked automatically, HTTPS is enforced everywhere, and all Chromium extensions work seamlessly — while Google can’t track your activity. Helium’s 13,000+ offline-ready !bangs let you jump straight to sites or AI tools like ChatGPT instantly. Open-source, people-first, and unbiased, Helium delivers a browsing experience that’s fast, secure, and free from noise, ads, and compromises. Helium Browser key features: Performance Fast, efficient, and lightweight — built on Chromium’s optimized engine. Energy-saving and consistent — stays fast over time without slowing down. No bloat — stripped of unnecessary components for maximum speed. Minimalist interface — compact, clean, and distraction-free. Customizable toolbar — hide elements you don’t need. Smooth and stable — no flicker, lag, or animation glitches. Comfort-focused experience — intuitive and unobtrusive. Privacy & Security Best privacy by default — blocks ads, trackers, phishing, and third-party cookies. Unbiased ad-blocking — powered by community filters and uBlock Origin. No telemetry or analytics — zero background web requests on first launch. Strict HTTPS enforcement — warns for insecure sites. Passkeys supported — modern authentication made simple. No built-in password manager or cloud sync — your data stays yours. Extension Compatibility Full Chromium extension support — including MV2 extensions. Anonymized Chrome Web Store requests — Google can’t track extension installs. Extended MV2 support — maintained for as long as possible. Smart Features Native !bangs — browse faster using 13,000+ offline-ready shortcuts. AI integration — use !chatgpt and others directly from the address bar. Offline functionality — bangs work without an Internet connection. Philosophy People-first design — open source, transparent, and community-driven. No ads, no noise, no bias — privacy and honesty over profit. Helium Browser 0.13.4.1 changelog: 0a4f1149 revision: bump to 4 (#1969) 4848de1f helium/core: enable the chromium screenshot feature (#1968) e0dec3f5 onboarding: integrate strings to i18n system (#1948) 417fa5bc i18n: fix newline parsing for onboarding 7a339b39 i18n: add foraged translations for onboarding 4f090cff i18n/generate: add handling for onboarding strings bfe48d58 i18n_apply: manually override parent grd logic for onboarding strings ab214e3c onboarding: bump in deps, wire up grdp afa6a059 helium/core: disable pdf infobar feature (#1965) eba585e7 helium/ui/vertical: fix new tab button alignment and icon size (#1964) 6ecfc9e0 helium/ui/tabs: fix horizontal tab hover background color (#1963) 3db87dc0 helium/ui/tabs: fix new tab button hover/press colors (#1962) 6bbdcc3e helium/ui: improve tab group UI in all layouts (#1961) 53deb314 helium/ui/tabs: enable tab group hover cards e93aece7 helium/ui/vertical: fix tab group appearance, prevent line overlap 629f5495 helium/ui/tabs: restore solid group header colors, enable new colors 961c962e helium/ui/tabs: move horiz tab group underline to bottom, make it thick c96deab6 merge: update to chromium 149.0.7827.155 (#1959) 36db56b4 i18n: update source.gen.json 5ce006ae patches: refresh for chromium 149.0.7827.155 b4c1ea62 merge: update ungoogled-chromium to 149.0.7827.155 4e5e8671 Update to Chromium 149.0.7827.155 08a3e7da helium/ui/layout: disable mute on collapsed vertical tabs (#1778) a0a5bbaf helium/core: simplify context menu and prevent huge widths (#1951) c4732aac devutils/i18n: add forage command (#1944) 11d16986 devutils/i18n: add an option to translate using local CLI tools (#1942) d820c3a2 i18n/prompt: tighten translation rules to prevent common errors (#1940) cf827007 Update to Chromium 149.0.7827.114 6e3d5164 Update to Chromium 149.0.7827.102 Download: Helium 64-bit | Portable 64-bit |~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Helium ARM64 | Portable ARM64 Links: Helium Home Page | macOS | Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Glow 26.10 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.10 changelog: New Features The bootstrapping algorithm has been completely redesigned. The software can now launch directly without requiring TS Preloader. As part of this change, the startup splash screen displayed during initialization has been removed. In addition, spikes in CPU usage have been eliminated, resulting in a more stable architecture with significantly lower memory consumption. The Microsoft Office detection infrastructure within the Operating System section has been enhanced. Additional detection support has been added for Office C2R (Click-to-Run) installations. Furthermore, the license status evaluation system has been improved, and the priority order has been revised as follows: Licensed > Grace Period > Other (NOTIFICATIONS, EVALUATION, etc.). Glow now includes preliminary support for Wi-Fi 8 technology, allowing more detailed information to be displayed for Wi-Fi 8-compatible network adapters. Glow now provides full support for Bluetooth 6.2. Adapters supporting Bluetooth 6.2 can be analyzed in greater detail and with improved accuracy. The disk distribution view in the Disk section has been modernized, replacing the traditional table layout with a new 2×2 card-based design. The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to v26.7. Thanks to the new custom controls, all Türkaysoft applications now offer a more modern and consistent user interface aligned with Windows 11 design standards. Bug Fixes Potential line-ending handling issues in the Office detection code within the Operating System section have been resolved. Additionally, the output format has been standardized to UTF-8 to prevent character encoding issues and ensure consistent data processing. Several stability and file management issues within the Debugging infrastructure have been addressed. Problems that prevented new log files from being created after Debugging was disabled, as well as issues causing debug records to be lost, have been fixed. File deletion and reaccess issues that occurred after file locks were released have also been resolved. In addition, a bug that caused newly recreated log files to remain locked after deletion has been eliminated. Unnecessary blank lines within debug logs and the extra empty line that could appear at the end of log files have also been corrected. A shortcut key conflict caused by assigning identical hotkeys to both the DNS Test Tool and the Donation page has been fixed. The DNS Test Tool can now be accessed using CTRL + Shift + D, while the Donation page is available via CTRL + Alt + D. Changes The service responsible for providing the Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider information in the Network section has been updated to use the ipinfo.io infrastructure. This change improves the accuracy and consistency of the displayed data. (No external requests are made while Hiding Mode is enabled.) Some terms in the Dutch and Korean language files have been updated to make them clearer and more user-friendly. [TS Updater] Before the update process begins, users are now prompted to choose whether they would like to view the release notes. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.10 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!