Best display profile for Macbook Pro?


Recommended Posts

A gamma of 2.2 produces better results for soft-proofing (web publishing), as it has become more of the standard. If you are in the print industry, you'll never use 2.2. Each display needs to be calibrated separately, so the gamma will vary depending upon the Mac's surroundings. You will always use a gamma closer to 1.8 if you are preparing images for print (hard-proofing). A gamma of 1.8 roughly equals the inverse of the human visual response in average lighting (not my words, but proven to be true).

Apple used 1.8, as it more closely matched the output of Apple Laser Writers as well as Quickdraw (deprecated as of 10.5). They still recommend using 1.8, all things being equal, as that is what the OS ui is designed around. However it comes down to personal preference. If you prefer a lighter output, 1.8. If you prefer something darker, 2.2.

I'd recommend running the Expert Calibration and setting the display to your preference.

if this 2.2 setting is so awesome .. why dont apple just make that the generic :blink:

Chad's response is most definitely the most comprehensive and correct response you'll get. I first started using it for web work because it closer matched what Windows users will see but stayed with it because after I got used to it I just prefer the way it looks. It adds a bit more contrast which I think looks really great with the UI. But as to why its not the default is for the historical reasons Chad mentions.

A gamma of 2.2 produces better results for soft-proofing (web publishing), as it has become more of the standard. If you are in the print industry, you'll never use 2.2. Each display needs to be calibrated separately, so the gamma will vary depending upon the Mac's surroundings. You will always use a gamma closer to 1.8 if you are preparing images for print (hard-proofing). A gamma of 1.8 roughly equals the inverse of the human visual response in average lighting (not my words, but proven to be true).

Apple used 1.8, as it more closely matched the output of Apple Laser Writers as well as Quickdraw (deprecated as of 10.5). They still recommend using 1.8, all things being equal, as that is what the OS ui is designed around. However it comes down to personal preference. If you prefer a lighter output, 1.8. If you prefer something darker, 2.2.

I'd recommend running the Expert Calibration and setting the display to your preference.

Good to see you still around and kickin' arse around the Mac section!

Chad's response is most definitely the most comprehensive and correct response you'll get. I first started using it for web work because it closer matched what Windows users will see but stayed with it because after I got used to it I just prefer the way it looks. It adds a bit more contrast which I think looks really great with the UI. But as to why its not the default is for the historical reasons Chad mentions.

Yeah I rather like 2.2 better as well. I've never been fond of the washed out look 1.8 gives.

Good to see you still around and kickin' arse around the Mac section!

You too Josh! Nice to have someone else from the 'old guard' around.

So no one here uses the sRGB IEC61966-2.1 colour profile for their MBPs?

The colours just seem so much more vibrant, and it doesn't have this weird tinge that seems like a coffee filter has been put in front of the screen or something that you get with Colour LCD.

So no one here uses the sRGB IEC61966-2.1 colour profile for their MBPs?

The colours just seem so much more vibrant, and it doesn't have this weird tinge that seems like a coffee filter has been put in front of the screen or something that you get with Colour LCD.

Never use generic ones like that. Use the calibration tool.

There is no need to use a calibration tool if he doesnt plan to create printable material.

It'll still affect the colors he's seeing through his display. You can be sure that the color won't be right if your display is using a color space that it's not fitted for.

It'll still affect the colors he's seeing through his display. You can be sure that the color won't be right if your display is using a color space that it's not fitted for.

Fair enough, its just that by experience I always discourage non experienced users to mess with calibrations tools. Im not saying that matty2312 its inexperienced, just that if he doesnt have an specific need for calibration sometimes its better to leave it as that.

Edited by sanctified
So no one here uses the sRGB IEC61966-2.1 colour profile for their MBPs?

The colours just seem so much more vibrant, and it doesn't have this weird tinge that seems like a coffee filter has been put in front of the screen or something that you get with Colour LCD.

The issue is once you get used to a certain profile everything else looks crazy. On any display I've ever tried for instance, the sRGB profile brings an incredibly weird blue cast over everything and is impossible for me to look at more than 30 seconds. But I do know people who use it full time and they're so used to it they can't stand the default profiles.

If you're doing work for the web, I always encourage people to stay as close to the default profile as possible simply because 99% of the people out there viewing your work (especially on a Mac) will be viewing it through the default profile. Setting gamma to 2.2 on the default profile allows you to see the same color tones but with a better contrast closer to what Windows users are seeing making it a great choice.

The issue is once you get used to a certain profile everything else looks crazy. On any display I've ever tried for instance, the sRGB profile brings an incredibly weird blue cast over everything and is impossible for me to look at more than 30 seconds. But I do know people who use it full time and they're so used to it they can't stand the default profiles.

If you're doing work for the web, I always encourage people to stay as close to the default profile as possible simply because 99% of the people out there viewing your work (especially on a Mac) will be viewing it through the default profile. Setting gamma to 2.2 on the default profile allows you to see the same color tones but with a better contrast closer to what Windows users are seeing making it a great choice.

Tell me about it. I hate to see my photography work in other monitors than my own. Its heart breaking :cry:

Fair enough, its just that by experience I always discourage non experienced users to mess with calibrations tools. Im not saying that matty2312 its inexperienced, just that if he doesnt have an specific need for calibration sometimes its better to leave it as that.

Haha I am inexperienced when it comes to all this colour business.

So, I need to switch it back to Colour LCD and then configure it how?

Even if I just change that gamma thing you guys were talking about, the sRGB blah blah blah -2.1 thing looks SO much better. Photos look better, colours look great and websites I've been looking at keep telling people to configure their photo programs for images @ the sRGB thing.

Haha I am inexperienced when it comes to all this colour business.

So, I need to switch it back to Colour LCD and then configure it how?

Even if I just change that gamma thing you guys were talking about, the sRGB blah blah blah -2.1 thing looks SO much better. Photos look better, colours look great and websites I've been looking at keep telling people to configure their photo programs for images @ the sRGB thing.

First, you don't need to switch back to Color LCD, you can leave it at whatever you want.

Second, about configuring your photo editing software to use sRGB, that's fairly good advice but only because of the way browsers handle color profiles. It has NOTHING to do with your monitor space ...

Third, when you say it looks "SO" much better, as I already mentioned, this is entirely subjective and your eye tends to just get used to something and feel its better. Believe me, people like myself who have been using a variation of Apple's default profiles for 8 years on OS X can't stand to look at a screen configured in sRGB.

First, you don't need to switch back to Color LCD, you can leave it at whatever you want.

Second, about configuring your photo editing software to use sRGB, that's fairly good advice but only because of the way browsers handle color profiles. It has NOTHING to do with your monitor space ...

Third, when you say it looks "SO" much better, as I already mentioned, this is entirely subjective and your eye tends to just get used to something and feel its better. Believe me, people like myself who have been using a variation of Apple's default profiles for 8 years on OS X can't stand to look at a screen configured in sRGB.

Ahh okay. Thanks very much dude. I'm going to play around with them all and see what I like, no harm in experimenting for a little bit to find what I really like.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Get $50 of aloSIM Mobile Data Traveler eSim credit for just $24.97 by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where you can save 50% off aloSIM Mobile Data Traveler Lifetime eSim Credit: Pay $24.97 for $50. Stay connected affordably in 120+ countries/regions with your own lifetime eSIM! An eSIM is a digital SIM card. It's basically just mobile data. Once it's activated on your device, it can connect you to data networks in other countries – giving you an internet connection with NO roaming charges. With aloSIM, you can load prepaid eSIM data packages onto your phone, tablet, or computer. Your lifetime eSIM never expires, so it's yours forever and there are never any monthly charges. You'll get $50 in eSIM data credit, which is almost always enough to cover all your data roaming needs for a full year. But if you run out of data, you can always top up your lifetime eSIM and stay connected internationally. Pay $24.97 for a lifetime eSIM with $50 in travel data credit Use your eSIM to join data networks in 120+ countries Install your lifetime eSIM on a compatible device to roam on local data networks Your lifetime eSIM never expires, and can be topped up with more data anytime Many data packages cost as little as $4.50 and last 7 days. Depending on the package you choose, the length of time varies. Good to know Length of access: lifetime For NEW customers only Instant digital redemption Once you add your $50 credit to your aloSim account you have up to 12-months to use it — after that your credit will expire When you pay for a data plan you also get a free phone number (via Hushed) for the same duration of your plan that was purchased - IE 7 day eSim plan gives you a free 7-day phone number Purchased coupon must be redeemed and used within 12 months This deal is not stackable (one offer per aloSIM account) A $4.50 data package will last 7 days The data DOES expire, and you WILL NOT have any leftover data for your next trip unless it takes place within the validity period. While the eSIM never expires, the actual data package is only valid for the length of time stated at purchase (i.e. seven days after activation, 30 days after activation, etc.) So if you buy a seven-day package and only use a tiny bit, that package is still going to expire after seven days. Access options: mobile (check compatibility) Max number of device(s): 1 Updates included Here's the deal: This aloSIM Mobile Data Traveler eSim $50 Credit normally costs ... $50, but it can be yours for just $24.97 for a limited time, a saving of $25 (50% off). For specifications, and license info please click the link below. Get this aloSIM Mobile Data Traveler eSim for just $24.97 (was $50) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • WordArt was cool. We now have color fonts as a substitute although Word only supports COLRv0 and COLRv1 (Fraud OS 11 only). The OpenType SVG color font format needs to be supported by Office. Adobe's apps support it
    • i backup my files, incl keepass to my proton drive using Syncback which i paid for (thanks Warwagon!). they have a free version but i can't remember what it does and doesn't do anymore. anyways, it's really, really simple and easy to use. i also periodically keep backups of my keepass onsite especially when i've changed or added a password that is important to me. if you don't wanna spend time on the syncthing setup, get syncback. haha i even got my dad to use it for his backups to usb and he doesn't even need my help!!! (thank god!)
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      158
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!