Recommended Posts

They have to be ****ing kidding us... What the hell is wrong with Microsoft?!

screenshot20090814at174.png

More like "what the hell is wrong with Apple in not installing Rosetta by default?"

Just because it's Microsoft doesn't mean it's evil.

It's been almost 4 years since the switch to Intel, plus an additional 6 months for them to prepare. If Adobe manages to bring out two Universal Creative Suites in that time span you'd think a company like Microsoft should be able to do the same.

More like "what the hell is wrong with Apple in not installing Rosetta by default?"

Just because it's Microsoft doesn't mean it's evil.

Microsoft Office 2008 shouldn't be relying on Rosetta anymore in the first place. Period.

Isn't that because Office is a Universal Binary? Something that Apple encouraged all developers to do?

Universal Binary means an application should be capable to run fully native on both PPC and Intel architectures. On Intel Macs that translates into without the help of Rosetta...

No. Universal binary makes an app not require Rosetta. It's the non-Universal apps that need it.

wctaiwan

Oh, well then it seems Office 2008 was developed for PowerPC, then. Don't see what the big deal is, frankly. Rosetta installs quickly and runs invisibly.

More like "what the hell is wrong with Apple in not installing Rosetta by default?"

Just because it's Microsoft doesn't mean it's evil.

Personally, I'm quite happy that Rosetta is now optional. Saves a bit of space that was rarely used... except, apparently, for using the Office installer.

The installer script shouldn't even be that complex...

Oh, well then it seems Office 2008 was developed for PowerPC, then. Don't see what the big deal is, frankly. Rosetta installs quickly and runs invisibly.

They shouldn't be relying on emulation that was bound to be removed at some point. I've not used Rosetta since installing Leopard, I don't think, except for installing Office. It's just wasting space.

Personally, I'm quite happy that Rosetta is now optional. Saves a bit of space that was rarely used... except, apparently, for using the Office installer.

The installer script shouldn't even be that complex...

They shouldn't be relying on emulation that was bound to be removed at some point. I've not used Rosetta since installing Leopard, I don't think, except for installing Office. It's just wasting space.

I agree. If they set out to try and minimize the footprint as much as possible, then removing Rosetta is a good idea. Hardly any mainstream or 'essential' apps use it these days, and it's a waste of space as stated.

Anyone got any info about bootcamp 3.0?

The Boot Camp Assistant remained unchanged in this build. However, like Quillz mentioned, they improved driver support. Including drivers to read (read-only) HFS+ formatted drives from within Windows.

Not sure if they added Windows 7 support.

For arguments sake:

I work for Apple in London & i can confirm that build 10a432 is not the Golden Master it has just been given to select devs to test a few expert issues. 10A433 is on it's way (for server at least) and with uncomplete features like no prefs for quicktime and no default 64-bit for capable machines (i mean that not even the extensions are 64-bit by default). The installation has been polished and is being tested by the chosen devs. As i have heard there will be 1 or 2 more builds before it gets to golden master. There is still a bit of testing going on with the new bootcamp drivers but other than that it's basically there. i hope this corrects a few things, i'm not sure how pretty much the entire internet has got this wrong but none the less mistakes happen.

http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p...p;postcount=362

Well that would suck, but no one seems to be paying much attention.

Yes, yes it would. However, everyone on the internet could claim they're working for Apple. The only thing we got going for this build is that it has been specially packed in a whole new DMG and hasn't been published through Software Update like every other build since WWDC.

However, there are some things in the DMG that worry me. The French install guide is still the one from Leopard and the Dutch welcome guide for example is in still English. Can't really imagine they'll put the OS out like that.

my MBP model is MacBookPro 2,1

acording to that list i cant run in 64bit even though i have a Core 2 Duo which is a 64bit proc ?

You can run 64-bit applications just fine. However the extensions and kernel will be 32-bit.

If one genuinely worked for Apple, one wouldn't say so on a public forum and the divulge information like that. Whilst what he is saying is likely true... I just don't believe him. I will believe the shiny disk when it is sat right in front of me.

If one genuinely worked for Apple, one wouldn't say so on a public forum and the divulge information like that. Whilst what he is saying is likely true... I just don't believe him. I will believe the shiny disk when it is sat right in front of me.

Well no one would believe him if he didn't say he worked for Apple so it's a catch 22. But then again it is a rumours site so you have to take everything with a pinch of salt, and if you don't believe him then as you say, just wait for it to get confirmed before getting all excited.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google are hyprocrites for signing this. They have been pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft, only they do it on Android and ChromeOS.
    • In some countries the law has forced Microsoft to display a menu on a fresh install of Windows which asks which web browser you want and it will install that browser. This doesn't add any bloat to Windows. It simply an additional step when setting up a new PC.
    • Chrome is also a first party browser on Android and ChromeOS. And on those systems, Google is pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft does on Windows.
    • Unofficial script lets you install unreleased Windows 11 features without Microsoft Account by Sayan Sen Microsoft has been steadily evolving the Windows Insider Program over the years, introducing new channels and testing paths that allow enthusiasts to experience upcoming and yet-to-be-released Windows features (some interesting hidden ones too) before they reach the public. However, one long-standing requirement has remained largely unchanged as users are generally expected to enroll in the Program and with a Microsoft account. That's where a third-party tool called "OfflineInsiderEnroll" can help. OfflineInsiderEnroll is said to be a lightweight script that enables access to Windows Insider Program builds on systems that are not signed in with a Microsoft account. Essentially the tool configures the necessary Insider settings locally and hence allows users to select and switch between available preview channels while continuing to receive builds through the normal Windows Update channel. If you are wondering how it manages to do so, it is made possible by a Registry value known as TestFlags. When configured to"0x20", Windows stops communicating with Microsoft's online Insider enrollment services thus preventing locally configured Insider settings from being overwritten. This allows the script to apply its own channel configuration directly through the Registry as Windows Update does not verify whether a device has been officially enrolled in the Insider Program or not. Previously the utility has had already supported the traditional Insider branches including Dev, Beta, and Release Preview. However following Microsoft’s recent restructuring of its preview channels, the script has now been updated. The latest OfflineInsiderEnroll version, 2.6.6, adds support for the newly introduced Insider channel lineup. As such, users can now choose from several Experimental channels in addition to Beta and Release Preview options. The update also retains tools for refreshing the Insider cache, resetting Insider settings, and completely stopping Insider enrollment when needed. Keep in mind though that will need elevated privileges when running the script (run as Admin). You can get the latest version of OfflineInsiderEnroll from this page on its official GitHub repo.
    • The "Classic" Outlook has done that for a few years as well. The option to even change that is really hidden away too... It really shouldn't be hard to respect user defaults. Sadly we are the product now, not Outlook. To change in the Classic Outlook: File > Options > Advanced > change "Open hyperlinks from Outlook in"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!