Recommended Posts

How is it any less likely for an application to become Snow Leopard-only than Leopard (and above)-only?

Well, Leopard-only applications were so because Leopard introduced things like Core Animation. But all of that is also in Snow Leopard. So unless an application absolutely requires something like Grand Central Dispatch, I just can't see an application for Snow Leopard also not being able to run on Leopard.

Well, Leopard-only applications were so because Leopard introduced things like Core Animation. But all of that is also in Snow Leopard. So unless an application absolutely requires something like Grand Central Dispatch, I just can't see an application for Snow Leopard also not being able to run on Leopard.

I can definitely see applications make use of Grand Central Dispatch, OpenCL and QuickTime X. More so than Core Animation.

my laptop came with 10.4, i got 10.5 due to the Dock/UI and changes from 10.4 ( 10.6 changes arent even close to those of 10.5 ) that made it worthwhile, i did not notice any speed increase from 10.4 to 10.5. as far as windows, i use whatever OS my games will work on, i didnt get Vista cause the hardware i had didnt give much of a benefit regarding it ( no DX10 vid or 64 proc and only 1 GB mem ) made the upgrade worthless for my desktop at the time ( desktop didnt run it that good and i got my Mac before Vista came out relegating the XP desktop to games only ).

my previous desktop is running XP, the desktop i build 2 months ago is running 7, built it cause of Aion Online, its running 7 cause its free and will be free when it comes in on the Action Pack @ work as i already have authorization for whatever the company gets in the pack.

i dont play games on my Mac anymore, only thing i did with it was Browse Net/WoW/WC3/Email, i dont play WoW anymore and Aion Online wont run on it and WC3 runs beautiful on it.

so far ( to me ) it doesn't seem like a worthwhile upgrade, and besides, while writing this, i remembered despite everything about the laptop being said as 64bit when i got it from apple, months after i bought it, found out i cant go over 4GB of memory as the Hardware wont support it, making the whole interested in pure 64bit worthless

Using that logic you could have stuck with Mac OS 9 or Windows 98 back in the days.

For the second time it was a quick joke, nothing more nothing less. In the end I don't really care if you upgrade to Snow Leopard or not. It's your Mac, your choice.

PS Sentences filling up three or four lines don't make your story particularly easy to read.

i doubt Quicktime X will be 10.6 only as it will be ported to windows ( its part of iTunes, and i doubt Apple will be running/supporting 3 separate versions of Quicktime , aka a Quicktime for iTunes a Quicktime for Windows, and Quicktime separate from iTunes )

and as far as your OS " Joke " the smiley at the end looked different before you edited

I can definitely see applications make use of Grand Central Dispatch, OpenCL and QuickTime X. More so than Core Animation.
Edited by Hell-In-A-Handbasket

interesting, didnt know that, doesn't make sense but /shrug, guess they may do that for QuicktimeX then

They're supporting QuickTime 7 Pro on Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard. In fact it's still on the Install DVD, so I wouldn't be too sure of that...

i was hoping for the black " Pro " UI myself, but yes what you see is what we will have to next couple years. if you dont like the UI though, have you tried a GUI Kit to replace the look of the UI ? would prolly ease the look of it if you dont like it

All in all though, it's a good, solid release. But it kinda left me wanting more... Is that what we'll be stuck with for the next couple of years? Aqua needs to go IMO.
What did they do with the font smoothing? The text is **** now (Dell LCD) black text looks dark gray and small font is barely readable (seems less strong/bold).

Is it set to Automatic? That relies on the display driver to detect what type of monitor it is, so it applies the smoothing setting for the monitor. Of course sometimes it gets it wrong (it detects my LCD as a CRT), so I have to manually set it to Medium.

Yea they really messed those up aswell. I used to use the SRGB one in Leopard, but now in Snow leopard the SRGB profile is garbage (extremely bright). So now I'm on the Generic RGB one :(

And don't use sRGB, sRGB is designed to model an average Office CRT from the 90's. I use the profile OS X generates from the monitor info, looks good enough for me (although if you're doing pro work, you'd want to make your own profile)

and i dont have to get snow lepard if i dont want to, my Programs will not Magically stop working when 10.6 come out, my laptop will still turn on, and run what is installed, if a program isnt compatable with 10.5 anymore, guess what, nobody is holding a gun to my head to install it/use it.

I am pretty positive you will end up with Snow Leopard a day or another in your life. Mac users are more eager to upgrade than Windows users, it's been shown in one of Steve's keynote statistics (I think it was him). If you decide to wait 2 more years until the next OS, not my problem, but you will represent a small % of the Mac user base who do this.

oo, 10.6 saved me +/- 1second on a program opening, OMG what will i do with all the free time. if a program opens in 2 or 3 seconds, so what, i dont care.

It's called optimization.

Some people think : It works, therefore it's well conceived. You know what? This statement is wrong. (I have a background in web development and I didn't understand that before - well now I totally do).

It's as if Apple packed their stuff with mercury in their monitors. I mean, 1 mg of mercury, who cares? It's not much... Well, mercury is not environmentally friendly and should be banned! That's what they did. If they sold 1 000 000 Macs with 1 mg, well it makes 1 kg of mercury, it's good to see that they saved that...

Or it's as if they shipped your MacBook in a 1m x 1m box. Ok, you got your product in the end, why should you be dissatisfied? It's the same product, same quality. But things weren't optimized. By doing this, it's not just for the end-user that you save some room, it's for the truck that delivers stuff as well. You're saving fuel by packing like 300% more computers if you optimize stuff.

Well I'm thinking the code of Snow Leopard is not only faster, but it's also easier to maintain, fix and develop - I'm pretty positive it's shorter and more concise. Why? Because the apps are smaller, and usually they add new APIs that add shortcuts to the programming language that is used. They did that in each version of OS X, and it's common sense, it's not going to change.

Maybe I like my field of study too much or something, and I'm blindly sold for the idea, but when I look at the everyday world, I see that things aren't optimized and sometimes, that 2-3 seconds that you save, well you can save it 100 times a day, and it's gonna make a big difference. Plus, you're saving CPU cycles, which means that you save energy. It's repercuted in a couple of places that we don't even take the time to notice. As stupid as that.

This is exactly why I'm happy about Snow Leopard. Sad thing is, the end-users won't notice a lot of changes (I am included).

dude, get over my opinion it is my own i speak for nobody else, im shure there are other things to do with your life

I am pretty positive you will end ... Leopard. Sad thing is, the end-users won't notice a lot of changes (I am included).
It's called optimization.

Some people think : It works, therefore it's well conceived. You know what? This statement is wrong. (I have a background in web development and I didn't understand that before - well now I totally do).

It's as if Apple packed their stuff with mercury in their monitors. I mean, 1 mg of mercury, who cares? It's not much... Well, mercury is not environmentally friendly and should be banned! That's what they did. If they sold 1 000 000 Macs with 1 mg, well it makes 1 kg of mercury, it's good to see that they saved that...

Or it's as if they shipped your MacBook in a 1m x 1m box. Ok, you got your product in the end, why should you be dissatisfied? It's the same product, same quality. But things weren't optimized. By doing this, it's not just for the end-user that you save some room, it's for the truck that delivers stuff as well. You're saving fuel by packing like 300% more computers if you optimize stuff.

Well I'm thinking the code of Snow Leopard is not only faster, but it's also easier to maintain, fix and develop - I'm pretty positive it's shorter and more concise. Why? Because the apps are smaller, and usually they add new APIs that add shortcuts to the programming language that is used. They did that in each version of OS X, and it's common sense, it's not going to change.

Maybe I like my field of study too much or something, and I'm blindly sold for the idea, but when I look at the everyday world, I see that things aren't optimized and sometimes, that 2-3 seconds that you save, well you can save it 100 times a day, and it's gonna make a big difference. Plus, you're saving CPU cycles, which means that you save energy. It's repercuted in a couple of places that we don't even take the time to notice. As stupid as that.

This is exactly why I'm happy about Snow Leopard. Sad thing is, the end-users won't notice a lot of changes (I am included).

I subscribe to your theory in that if the overall OS/application footprint is tiny, but then a ton of fluff is added on top, it leads to an inefficient end-product. Back in the Windows days, I was a huge fan of NLite and the process of slip-streaming hot-fixes and service packs. You are not just bundling them in there, you are actually updating the source repository before you even install the OS, which gives you an installed system that is not bogged down with a post-installation mess. By providing a solid foundation for the OS and core apps, you end up with a highly-efficient base on which to work.

Unfortunately, the concept of having to install a base Leopard OS and then upgrade SL on top of that just bugs me. I would be more than happy to pay 129$ and get a non-upgrade DVD of Leopard. Please Apple, tell me you will sell a full install DVD, not just the "29$ special"

I subscribe to your theory in that if the overall OS/application footprint is tiny, but then a ton of fluff is added on top, it leads to an inefficient end-product. Back in the Windows days, I was a huge fan of NLite and the process of slip-streaming hot-fixes and service packs. You are not just bundling them in there, you are actually updating the source repository before you even install the OS, which gives you an installed system that is not bogged down with a post-installation mess. By providing a solid foundation for the OS and core apps, you end up with a highly-efficient base on which to work.

Unfortunately, the concept of having to install a base Leopard OS and then upgrade SL on top of that just bugs me. I would be more than happy to pay 129$ and get a non-upgrade DVD of Leopard. Please Apple, tell me you will sell a full install DVD, not just the "29$ special"

They will sell the full install DVD, but I think it's $169 this time instead of the usual $129 that has been.

Unfortunately, the concept of having to install a base Leopard OS and then upgrade SL on top of that just bugs me. I would be more than happy to pay 129$ and get a non-upgrade DVD of Leopard. Please Apple, tell me you will sell a full install DVD, not just the "29$ special"

You mean a non-upgrade DVD of Snow Leopard? :p This naming scheme is confusing sometimes!

But yeah, I agree that users should be able to just buy the thing for $129. The Mac Box Set isn't expensive at all for all that you get, but some people really want just the OS and don't care about the rest. They should have kept the big DVD for $129 IMO.

But then again, Snow Leopard is Intel-only... I guess 80% of all the Macs shipped with Intel processors had Leopard installed on them. So there's a remaining 20%, like mine who shipped with just Tiger back in the time.

Is it set to Automatic? That relies on the display driver to detect what type of monitor it is, so it applies the smoothing setting for the monitor. Of course sometimes it gets it wrong (it detects my LCD as a CRT), so I have to manually set it to Medium.

And don't use sRGB, sRGB is designed to model an average Office CRT from the 90's. I use the profile OS X generates from the monitor info, looks good enough for me (although if you're doing pro work, you'd want to make your own profile)

There is no "medium" setting for font smoothing (least not in the system pref).

And as for those saying don't use srgb, it is the ONLY color profile that displays colors correctly on my monitor. (Dell 2408wfp).

I also notice when I do a custom color profile, when I'm in the setup process the monitor looks correctly, and then when it saves the profile and goes back to system pref (display settings) the colors get messed up again (even after re-selecting the profile I just made).

Linkinus doesn't run :(

Edited by Timan

I did an upgrade and Snow Leopard betas were more smooth than Leopard's finals. I had to format it to reinstall Leopard and I can confirm this.

What's wrong with upgrades by the way? When I was back with Windows, I must admit that it caused me a lot of problems, so I always ended up making a clean install at the end, but it's well conceived on Macs. I did it and everything was working, even my custom prefpanes in System Preferences. I didn't have to reinstall anything more so it took like an hour and my MacBook was running Snow Leopard, smoooothly.

I did an upgrade and Snow Leopard betas were more smooth than Leopard's finals. I had to format it to reinstall Leopard and I can confirm this.

What's wrong with upgrades by the way? When I was back with Windows, I must admit that it caused me a lot of problems, so I always ended up making a clean install at the end, but it's well conceived on Macs. I did it and everything was working, even my custom prefpanes in System Preferences. I didn't have to reinstall anything more so it took like an hour and my MacBook was running Snow Leopard, smoooothly.

Actually, upgrades work very smoothly on Windows, too.

The problem is that with both Mac OS X and Windows, the upgrade processes have a tendency to waste a lot of disk space because they essentially rename your current installation to something else and then install a new copy of the OS. And even though it's then a matter of just copying over your data, you sometimes accidentally overwrite important system files, etc.

With every operating system, whether it's Windows, Mac OS X or Linux, you're better off just backing up your critical (and personal) data and doing a clean install. With Mac OS X, just have Time Machine back everything up, do a clean install and then just restore everything again using your Time Machine backup. Very simple and it minimizes any trouble that upgrading might cause.

It's only $169 because you're forced into buying the Mac Box Set.

No one is being forced into buying anything. You get a OS X license when you buy a Mac and since you may only install OS X on a real Mac there is really no sense in selling anything other than an upgrade license. That doesn't mean you will get a disc set that can only upgrade the already installed system, previous versions never did, they were also able to do a clean install. Most likely that this will be the case for Snow Leopard as well. The price is different this time because the changes are minimal, it's a polished version of Leopard.

To me those polishes are enough to make me buy Snow Leopard. Especially features like full 64 bit, GCD, OpenCL and smaller things like Expose in the dock and improved stacks. I use VMware Fusion quite a lot so the 64 bit, GCD and probably OpenCL will come in handy for this kind of stuff. The 64 bit stuff also enables a lot of neat stuff like more registers and more mem addresses. This means there is a gain in security regarding addressing memory. I'm also hoping Snow Leopard will add TRIM support like Linux already did and like Windows 7 will. Since I'm using an OCZ Vertex SSD that would be a very useful feature to me (OCZ is working together with Indilinx on a new firmware with garbage collection and TRIM, both techniques actually work together). Apart from that, an upgrade license for $29 is a bargain!

BTW: that Mac Box Set contains iWork 09, iLife 09 and OS X (still is Leopard but that will be Snow Leopard once it's released). The Box set is meant for people who want to upgrade to the newest iWork, iLife and OS X version. The chance of Tiger people wanting to upgrade those 3 pieces of software is a lot bigger than Leopard people wanting to upgrade those 3. Quite obvious why a company would aim for Tiger users and not for Leopard users. If you only want to upgrade to the newest OS X than you don't need the Mac Box Set, just buy Snow Leopard.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!