Recommended Posts

How is it any less likely for an application to become Snow Leopard-only than Leopard (and above)-only?

Well, Leopard-only applications were so because Leopard introduced things like Core Animation. But all of that is also in Snow Leopard. So unless an application absolutely requires something like Grand Central Dispatch, I just can't see an application for Snow Leopard also not being able to run on Leopard.

Well, Leopard-only applications were so because Leopard introduced things like Core Animation. But all of that is also in Snow Leopard. So unless an application absolutely requires something like Grand Central Dispatch, I just can't see an application for Snow Leopard also not being able to run on Leopard.

I can definitely see applications make use of Grand Central Dispatch, OpenCL and QuickTime X. More so than Core Animation.

my laptop came with 10.4, i got 10.5 due to the Dock/UI and changes from 10.4 ( 10.6 changes arent even close to those of 10.5 ) that made it worthwhile, i did not notice any speed increase from 10.4 to 10.5. as far as windows, i use whatever OS my games will work on, i didnt get Vista cause the hardware i had didnt give much of a benefit regarding it ( no DX10 vid or 64 proc and only 1 GB mem ) made the upgrade worthless for my desktop at the time ( desktop didnt run it that good and i got my Mac before Vista came out relegating the XP desktop to games only ).

my previous desktop is running XP, the desktop i build 2 months ago is running 7, built it cause of Aion Online, its running 7 cause its free and will be free when it comes in on the Action Pack @ work as i already have authorization for whatever the company gets in the pack.

i dont play games on my Mac anymore, only thing i did with it was Browse Net/WoW/WC3/Email, i dont play WoW anymore and Aion Online wont run on it and WC3 runs beautiful on it.

so far ( to me ) it doesn't seem like a worthwhile upgrade, and besides, while writing this, i remembered despite everything about the laptop being said as 64bit when i got it from apple, months after i bought it, found out i cant go over 4GB of memory as the Hardware wont support it, making the whole interested in pure 64bit worthless

Using that logic you could have stuck with Mac OS 9 or Windows 98 back in the days.

For the second time it was a quick joke, nothing more nothing less. In the end I don't really care if you upgrade to Snow Leopard or not. It's your Mac, your choice.

PS Sentences filling up three or four lines don't make your story particularly easy to read.

i doubt Quicktime X will be 10.6 only as it will be ported to windows ( its part of iTunes, and i doubt Apple will be running/supporting 3 separate versions of Quicktime , aka a Quicktime for iTunes a Quicktime for Windows, and Quicktime separate from iTunes )

and as far as your OS " Joke " the smiley at the end looked different before you edited

I can definitely see applications make use of Grand Central Dispatch, OpenCL and QuickTime X. More so than Core Animation.
Edited by Hell-In-A-Handbasket

interesting, didnt know that, doesn't make sense but /shrug, guess they may do that for QuicktimeX then

They're supporting QuickTime 7 Pro on Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard. In fact it's still on the Install DVD, so I wouldn't be too sure of that...

i was hoping for the black " Pro " UI myself, but yes what you see is what we will have to next couple years. if you dont like the UI though, have you tried a GUI Kit to replace the look of the UI ? would prolly ease the look of it if you dont like it

All in all though, it's a good, solid release. But it kinda left me wanting more... Is that what we'll be stuck with for the next couple of years? Aqua needs to go IMO.
What did they do with the font smoothing? The text is **** now (Dell LCD) black text looks dark gray and small font is barely readable (seems less strong/bold).

Is it set to Automatic? That relies on the display driver to detect what type of monitor it is, so it applies the smoothing setting for the monitor. Of course sometimes it gets it wrong (it detects my LCD as a CRT), so I have to manually set it to Medium.

Yea they really messed those up aswell. I used to use the SRGB one in Leopard, but now in Snow leopard the SRGB profile is garbage (extremely bright). So now I'm on the Generic RGB one :(

And don't use sRGB, sRGB is designed to model an average Office CRT from the 90's. I use the profile OS X generates from the monitor info, looks good enough for me (although if you're doing pro work, you'd want to make your own profile)

and i dont have to get snow lepard if i dont want to, my Programs will not Magically stop working when 10.6 come out, my laptop will still turn on, and run what is installed, if a program isnt compatable with 10.5 anymore, guess what, nobody is holding a gun to my head to install it/use it.

I am pretty positive you will end up with Snow Leopard a day or another in your life. Mac users are more eager to upgrade than Windows users, it's been shown in one of Steve's keynote statistics (I think it was him). If you decide to wait 2 more years until the next OS, not my problem, but you will represent a small % of the Mac user base who do this.

oo, 10.6 saved me +/- 1second on a program opening, OMG what will i do with all the free time. if a program opens in 2 or 3 seconds, so what, i dont care.

It's called optimization.

Some people think : It works, therefore it's well conceived. You know what? This statement is wrong. (I have a background in web development and I didn't understand that before - well now I totally do).

It's as if Apple packed their stuff with mercury in their monitors. I mean, 1 mg of mercury, who cares? It's not much... Well, mercury is not environmentally friendly and should be banned! That's what they did. If they sold 1 000 000 Macs with 1 mg, well it makes 1 kg of mercury, it's good to see that they saved that...

Or it's as if they shipped your MacBook in a 1m x 1m box. Ok, you got your product in the end, why should you be dissatisfied? It's the same product, same quality. But things weren't optimized. By doing this, it's not just for the end-user that you save some room, it's for the truck that delivers stuff as well. You're saving fuel by packing like 300% more computers if you optimize stuff.

Well I'm thinking the code of Snow Leopard is not only faster, but it's also easier to maintain, fix and develop - I'm pretty positive it's shorter and more concise. Why? Because the apps are smaller, and usually they add new APIs that add shortcuts to the programming language that is used. They did that in each version of OS X, and it's common sense, it's not going to change.

Maybe I like my field of study too much or something, and I'm blindly sold for the idea, but when I look at the everyday world, I see that things aren't optimized and sometimes, that 2-3 seconds that you save, well you can save it 100 times a day, and it's gonna make a big difference. Plus, you're saving CPU cycles, which means that you save energy. It's repercuted in a couple of places that we don't even take the time to notice. As stupid as that.

This is exactly why I'm happy about Snow Leopard. Sad thing is, the end-users won't notice a lot of changes (I am included).

dude, get over my opinion it is my own i speak for nobody else, im shure there are other things to do with your life

I am pretty positive you will end ... Leopard. Sad thing is, the end-users won't notice a lot of changes (I am included).
It's called optimization.

Some people think : It works, therefore it's well conceived. You know what? This statement is wrong. (I have a background in web development and I didn't understand that before - well now I totally do).

It's as if Apple packed their stuff with mercury in their monitors. I mean, 1 mg of mercury, who cares? It's not much... Well, mercury is not environmentally friendly and should be banned! That's what they did. If they sold 1 000 000 Macs with 1 mg, well it makes 1 kg of mercury, it's good to see that they saved that...

Or it's as if they shipped your MacBook in a 1m x 1m box. Ok, you got your product in the end, why should you be dissatisfied? It's the same product, same quality. But things weren't optimized. By doing this, it's not just for the end-user that you save some room, it's for the truck that delivers stuff as well. You're saving fuel by packing like 300% more computers if you optimize stuff.

Well I'm thinking the code of Snow Leopard is not only faster, but it's also easier to maintain, fix and develop - I'm pretty positive it's shorter and more concise. Why? Because the apps are smaller, and usually they add new APIs that add shortcuts to the programming language that is used. They did that in each version of OS X, and it's common sense, it's not going to change.

Maybe I like my field of study too much or something, and I'm blindly sold for the idea, but when I look at the everyday world, I see that things aren't optimized and sometimes, that 2-3 seconds that you save, well you can save it 100 times a day, and it's gonna make a big difference. Plus, you're saving CPU cycles, which means that you save energy. It's repercuted in a couple of places that we don't even take the time to notice. As stupid as that.

This is exactly why I'm happy about Snow Leopard. Sad thing is, the end-users won't notice a lot of changes (I am included).

I subscribe to your theory in that if the overall OS/application footprint is tiny, but then a ton of fluff is added on top, it leads to an inefficient end-product. Back in the Windows days, I was a huge fan of NLite and the process of slip-streaming hot-fixes and service packs. You are not just bundling them in there, you are actually updating the source repository before you even install the OS, which gives you an installed system that is not bogged down with a post-installation mess. By providing a solid foundation for the OS and core apps, you end up with a highly-efficient base on which to work.

Unfortunately, the concept of having to install a base Leopard OS and then upgrade SL on top of that just bugs me. I would be more than happy to pay 129$ and get a non-upgrade DVD of Leopard. Please Apple, tell me you will sell a full install DVD, not just the "29$ special"

I subscribe to your theory in that if the overall OS/application footprint is tiny, but then a ton of fluff is added on top, it leads to an inefficient end-product. Back in the Windows days, I was a huge fan of NLite and the process of slip-streaming hot-fixes and service packs. You are not just bundling them in there, you are actually updating the source repository before you even install the OS, which gives you an installed system that is not bogged down with a post-installation mess. By providing a solid foundation for the OS and core apps, you end up with a highly-efficient base on which to work.

Unfortunately, the concept of having to install a base Leopard OS and then upgrade SL on top of that just bugs me. I would be more than happy to pay 129$ and get a non-upgrade DVD of Leopard. Please Apple, tell me you will sell a full install DVD, not just the "29$ special"

They will sell the full install DVD, but I think it's $169 this time instead of the usual $129 that has been.

Unfortunately, the concept of having to install a base Leopard OS and then upgrade SL on top of that just bugs me. I would be more than happy to pay 129$ and get a non-upgrade DVD of Leopard. Please Apple, tell me you will sell a full install DVD, not just the "29$ special"

You mean a non-upgrade DVD of Snow Leopard? :p This naming scheme is confusing sometimes!

But yeah, I agree that users should be able to just buy the thing for $129. The Mac Box Set isn't expensive at all for all that you get, but some people really want just the OS and don't care about the rest. They should have kept the big DVD for $129 IMO.

But then again, Snow Leopard is Intel-only... I guess 80% of all the Macs shipped with Intel processors had Leopard installed on them. So there's a remaining 20%, like mine who shipped with just Tiger back in the time.

Is it set to Automatic? That relies on the display driver to detect what type of monitor it is, so it applies the smoothing setting for the monitor. Of course sometimes it gets it wrong (it detects my LCD as a CRT), so I have to manually set it to Medium.

And don't use sRGB, sRGB is designed to model an average Office CRT from the 90's. I use the profile OS X generates from the monitor info, looks good enough for me (although if you're doing pro work, you'd want to make your own profile)

There is no "medium" setting for font smoothing (least not in the system pref).

And as for those saying don't use srgb, it is the ONLY color profile that displays colors correctly on my monitor. (Dell 2408wfp).

I also notice when I do a custom color profile, when I'm in the setup process the monitor looks correctly, and then when it saves the profile and goes back to system pref (display settings) the colors get messed up again (even after re-selecting the profile I just made).

Linkinus doesn't run :(

Edited by Timan

I did an upgrade and Snow Leopard betas were more smooth than Leopard's finals. I had to format it to reinstall Leopard and I can confirm this.

What's wrong with upgrades by the way? When I was back with Windows, I must admit that it caused me a lot of problems, so I always ended up making a clean install at the end, but it's well conceived on Macs. I did it and everything was working, even my custom prefpanes in System Preferences. I didn't have to reinstall anything more so it took like an hour and my MacBook was running Snow Leopard, smoooothly.

I did an upgrade and Snow Leopard betas were more smooth than Leopard's finals. I had to format it to reinstall Leopard and I can confirm this.

What's wrong with upgrades by the way? When I was back with Windows, I must admit that it caused me a lot of problems, so I always ended up making a clean install at the end, but it's well conceived on Macs. I did it and everything was working, even my custom prefpanes in System Preferences. I didn't have to reinstall anything more so it took like an hour and my MacBook was running Snow Leopard, smoooothly.

Actually, upgrades work very smoothly on Windows, too.

The problem is that with both Mac OS X and Windows, the upgrade processes have a tendency to waste a lot of disk space because they essentially rename your current installation to something else and then install a new copy of the OS. And even though it's then a matter of just copying over your data, you sometimes accidentally overwrite important system files, etc.

With every operating system, whether it's Windows, Mac OS X or Linux, you're better off just backing up your critical (and personal) data and doing a clean install. With Mac OS X, just have Time Machine back everything up, do a clean install and then just restore everything again using your Time Machine backup. Very simple and it minimizes any trouble that upgrading might cause.

It's only $169 because you're forced into buying the Mac Box Set.

No one is being forced into buying anything. You get a OS X license when you buy a Mac and since you may only install OS X on a real Mac there is really no sense in selling anything other than an upgrade license. That doesn't mean you will get a disc set that can only upgrade the already installed system, previous versions never did, they were also able to do a clean install. Most likely that this will be the case for Snow Leopard as well. The price is different this time because the changes are minimal, it's a polished version of Leopard.

To me those polishes are enough to make me buy Snow Leopard. Especially features like full 64 bit, GCD, OpenCL and smaller things like Expose in the dock and improved stacks. I use VMware Fusion quite a lot so the 64 bit, GCD and probably OpenCL will come in handy for this kind of stuff. The 64 bit stuff also enables a lot of neat stuff like more registers and more mem addresses. This means there is a gain in security regarding addressing memory. I'm also hoping Snow Leopard will add TRIM support like Linux already did and like Windows 7 will. Since I'm using an OCZ Vertex SSD that would be a very useful feature to me (OCZ is working together with Indilinx on a new firmware with garbage collection and TRIM, both techniques actually work together). Apart from that, an upgrade license for $29 is a bargain!

BTW: that Mac Box Set contains iWork 09, iLife 09 and OS X (still is Leopard but that will be Snow Leopard once it's released). The Box set is meant for people who want to upgrade to the newest iWork, iLife and OS X version. The chance of Tiger people wanting to upgrade those 3 pieces of software is a lot bigger than Leopard people wanting to upgrade those 3. Quite obvious why a company would aim for Tiger users and not for Leopard users. If you only want to upgrade to the newest OS X than you don't need the Mac Box Set, just buy Snow Leopard.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Hope all is well. I am in UK.  
    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!