The Official Spore Thread

By Minifig
in PC Gaming

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Fourjays Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted (edited)
I don't think that's a good enough excuse. That video is 3 years old, so running on high end hardware from back then, which is maybe mid-low end now. It runs fine on my middling system (C2D oc'ed 2.4GHz, 4GB ram, 8600GT @ 1920x1200, Vista Ultimate x64), so most systems from the last 2 years should be more than adequate I reckon.

I think like others have said, it got 'dumbed down'. Great shame as that demo looked superb.

Here's hoping for Spore 2.

It was said a while ago that Spore would run on the same as Sims 2. Which makes perfect sense and you can tell the engine is essentially the same.

The Sims 3 looks to be a new engine and appears similar to the original Spore demo in respect to everything "flowing" better as well as the graphics. So it makes sense to me that a "Spore 2" may come in the future using that engine. Hopefully not too far away because it looked very, very good.

Additionally, maybe they wanted Spore on as many PCs as possible the first time, in order to get everyone "on board" before pushing forward? Kind of like how Sims 1 was in 2D.

My system is considerably less than that and I wouldn't even consider mine "mass market for families".

Edited by Fourjays
Grand Master

»X«

Posted
Posted
So far, after playing up to the Tribal stage, I'm a little disappointed in the fact that you really spend no time in the first 2 stages at all.

I have to echo these thoughts. It just felt so quick. The only stage with any apparent depth is the space part. However that's from one extreme to the other. All the micromanagement bored me almost straight away.

Its a good game, but I think its a distraction. Its far from game of the year.

Experienced

solardog

Posted
Posted
Got Spore at the weekend, and played with it for a few hours. Loved the first two parts of the game, great fun. The third part was basically a re-hash of the original Warcraft (NOT WoW) from 10+ years ago and started to lose me. Pretty much hated fourth part as there is no real instruction on what your doing at the start (i.e. the vehicle you have to design, you're given no idea what it's for until AFTER you've designed it). I've played about 30 minutes of the space section, and it just seems like pure tedium. Having read through some posts on the official Spore forum and what people are complaining about there (pirate attacks, crumbling eco-systems etc, and you having to single handedly fix everything immediately) I doubt I'll enjoy this part either.

I've also just watched the 2005 presentation by Will Wright on YouTube and I can't believe that the game demoed 3 years ago is related to whats just released. That game had so much more depth, and a much greater sense of exploration and an evolutionary 'sand-box'. I want that game. PLEASE!

This reminds me of something. Swap out Spore and replace with Project Ego/Fable. I was going to grab this today, but this sentiment seems to be pretty common...I may be rethinking.

Veteran

Morgan

Posted
Posted

You know I've got to agree with the quote in the above post. I too remember seeing that demo (or one of...) and wow, I was just so amazed by it. It really looked like it had a lot more depth. I was thinking about it today, and it would be a MUCH more amazing game if it actually had some online game play, and it would definitely add a lot more replayability (is that even a word) to the game. I mean, how much fun would it be to team up with 2 or 3 other friends, and play against other people all over the world. I have no idea why they didn't add such functions to the game.

I mean, sure it's fun for the first maybe 2-3 times you run through all the stages, but with no social interaction between live people, it can get rather boring...

I feel like this game needs to be put back into the oven and cooked for another year unfortunately. This game had so much potential, but not enough follow through which is too bad...

Oh well, at least it came with an awesome art book!

Grand Master

Fourjays Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

I think the problem with Spore is that they've been unable to decide how to make it "playable" and "accessible" while applying it to evolution. The mechanics behind are brilliant and what I saw of that video looked to me more a "sandbox" then a game.

I'll try and use the Sims to explain - in the Sims you have your neighbourhood, in the neighbourhood are families and in the families are Sims. The neighbourhoods are totally separate, but the families within the neighbourhood are separate until you make them interact. Likewise, while the Sims are grouped in families, they are indeed individuals. You can play as one family, or another. You are fairly free to be who you want, when you want and they constantly age. As the family grows old, you start playing as the one that was just a baby at the start. In that way it is a continuous game - it won't end until you want it too. Alongside this, you have a sort of mini-game - fulfilling their needs and aspirations.

In comparison, in Spore the neighbourhoods are the galaxies. The family is the planet and the Sims are your creature. The problem being that unlike the Sims you can't switch from one planet to another, or from one creature to another. You are stuck with what you start with and therefore it has to come to an end. Not a big problem in itself - many games have a start and an end. The problem is that the gameplay is still designed for a continuous game like the Sims, and it just doesn't suit a start and end game.

It's like they've tried to merge the clever mechanics they've made, with the simple short-term gameplay of the Sims and the style of an RTS.

I hope that sort of makes sense, struggling to explain what I'm feeling about Spore.

Experienced

solardog

Posted
Posted
I think the problem with Spore is that they've been unable to decide how to make it "playable" and "accessible" while applying it to evolution. The mechanics behind are brilliant and what I saw of that video looked to me more a "sandbox" then a game.

I'll try and use the Sims to explain - in the Sims you have your neighbourhood, in the neighbourhood are families and in the families are Sims. The neighbourhoods are totally separate, but the families within the neighbourhood are separate until you make them interact. Likewise, while the Sims are grouped in families, they are indeed individuals. You can play as one family, or another. You are fairly free to be who you want, when you want and they constantly age. As the family grows old, you start playing as the one that was just a baby at the start. In that way it is a continuous game - it won't end until you want it too. Alongside this, you have a sort of mini-game - fulfilling their needs and aspirations.

In comparison, in Spore the neighbourhoods are the galaxies. The family is the planet and the Sims are your creature. The problem being that unlike the Sims you can't switch from one planet to another, or from one creature to another. You are stuck with what you start with and therefore it has to come to an end. Not a big problem in itself - many games have a start and an end. The problem is that the gameplay is still designed for a continuous game like the Sims, and it just doesn't suit a start and end game.

It's like they've tried to merge the clever mechanics they've made, with the simple short-term gameplay of the Sims and the style of an RTS.

I hope that sort of makes sense, struggling to explain what I'm feeling about Spore.

Thats a good explanation from what Ive heard. I'm still on the fence...seems innovative, yet I see myself burning out on it very quickly. The demo of the creature creation is very addictive, I tend to loose myself in that alone.

Grand Master

+longgonebn Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted
Thats a good explanation from what Ive heard. I'm still on the fence...seems innovative, yet I see myself burning out on it very quickly. The demo of the creature creation is very addictive, I tend to loose myself in that alone.

I stopped playing the Creature Creator within a day, got boring fast. Though this full game has more to it, I will probably finish it in a couple days. Will I go through another round, not sure.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • AMD 9070XT

      By cooky560 · Posted

      Well I've done a grand total of nothing, and it now clocks between 2010mhz and 1995mhz (stock is 1710mhz) and hovers around 80c, warmer than it used to, but tolerable clocks seem to have returned. Thanks for all the advice on this thread. Will review the evidence and make a choice.
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC

      By ExPat · Posted

      Looking forward to the test results.
    • Audacious 4.6.1

      By Copernic · Posted

      Audacious 4.6.1 by Razvan Serea Audacious is a lightweight, open-source audio player that emphasizes simplicity, performance, and sound quality. Designed for Linux, Windows, and macOS, it supports a wide range of audio formats, internet radio streaming, and playlist management. Users can customize the interface with Winamp-style skins or modern themes, making it flexible for different preferences. Audacious also includes an equalizer, advanced audio effects, and a plugin system for extending functionality. Its low resource usage makes it especially suitable for older computers or users who value efficiency without sacrificing playback quality. Audacious key features: High audio quality – delivers clean, gapless playback with minimal distortion. Wide format support – plays MP3, FLAC, Ogg Vorbis, AAC, WAV, WMA, and more. Internet radio streaming – supports Shoutcast, Icecast, and other online streams. Winamp skin support – classic, nostalgic look for users who prefer the old-school style. Modern GTK-based interface – clean, simple UI with a more modern feel. Customizable themes – change appearance through skins and themes. Advanced playlist management – organize, save, and edit playlists with ease. Equalizer – fine-tune audio output with a built-in graphical equalizer. Audio effects – built-in DSP options like crossfade, replay gain, and more. Plugin system – extend functionality with additional components. File metadata support – displays and organizes music based on tags. Drag-and-drop support – quickly add songs or playlists. Global hotkey support – control playback without switching windows. Bit-perfect output modes – bypass system mixers for pure audio output. ReplayGain support – normalizes track loudness automatically. Cue sheet support – play entire albums from a single audio file with .cue. MPRIS2 integration – integrates with Linux desktop environments for media controls. Advanced resampling options – adjust playback quality with different resampler settings. Gapless playback – seamless transition between tracks encoded properly. Crossfade plugin – blend one song into the next smoothly. Last.fm scrobbling plugin – track listening history online. Remote control support – control Audacious via command-line or scripts. Lyrics plugin – display song lyrics if available. Alarm / timer plugin – start or stop playback at set times. SOX resampler plugin – high-quality resampling for audiophiles. Spectrum analyzer / visualization plugins – visual feedback while playing music. Headphone crossfeed effect – simulates speaker listening for headphones. Customizable buffer size – tweak latency and playback smoothness. Audacious 4.6.1 changelog: Use XDG cache dir to store temporary files (#1817) Accept embedded lyrics in more cases (#1818) Bump .so and plugin ABI versions retrospectively (#1819) Include Georgian translation (#1820) Fix build on systems using musl instead of glibc (#1823) Download: Audacious 4.6.1 | 48.2 MB (Open Source) Download: Portable Audacious 4.6.1 | 69.8 MB View: Audacious Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Politically funny images of the World

      By +DoctorD · Posted

    • Can't access the forum on mobile

      By Steven P. · Posted

      I really wonder if this has to do with the built in VPN or "private DNS" of browsers that trip up legal requirements like cookie consent and Cloudflare (to avoid all the botnet attacks we get). And BTW some botnets still manage to get past Cloudflare, we are constantly having to tweak it to block malicious traffic that ultimately cause a DDoS.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      197
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      142
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      89
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!