iPod Touch Play/Skip Count


Recommended Posts

I've got an 8GB iPod Touch (Old version), and the Play/Skip count has never been working right.

It basically doesn't count anything. It might count 1 very, very, VERY rarely - but in general it just doesn't work.

It's never worked right. I've upgraded, reset, jailbroken, reverted, restored... you name it. It's been done.

Is it a known problem or is there something wrong with my iPod?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/643570-ipod-touch-playskip-count/
Share on other sites

Okay, I kinda figured it out for myself.

I don't let a song run all the way through. The silence at the end - I'll skip to the next track - and I TAKE it this means it doesn't count as a play.

And sometimes I'll start the song, and fast-forward it to a certain point and listen from there - and THAT doesn't count as a play either?

Very annoying behaviour! :(

I'd rather have it so it counts a song as a 'play' once it's been on for a minute or something.

  • 2 weeks later...
I wouldn't worry about it too much, it's only a numerical value. Just enjoy your music. :)

It's not though. It's the basis of what SHOULD be my favourite playlist - When I open the 'Top 25 Most Played' it just comes up with 10 songs I like and 15 songs I don't class as 'Top 25'.

And there is actually a problem with it. I know for a FACT that I've played through a song at least 3 times today and it's not counted it AT ALL. What a load of ... yanno. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why should simply opening the Action Center ... require any significant amount of CPU cycles? Too many are ignoring the elephant in the room: today's CPUs may have similar clock frequencies to CPUs from a decade ago (~4 to 5 GHz), but they run with far higher performance per clock, even on the smallest E-cores. The Action Center is a static, minor desktop element. It ought to open instantly on any CPU made in the past 2.5 decades at even low clocks. Opening a program? Boost away. Unzipping a file? Boost to your heart's content. Right-clicking the notification area? This should be an ultra-efficient, low-impact event that opens instantly. Compare today's UI elements to Windows 7 UI elements. Today's UI elements hardly do anything more substantial or important or critical, yet now require modern-day processors to jump half a GHz to reduce their latency.
    • This is not an option lmao: it is part of the KB5094126 update, pushed to all users. There is no GUI to configure it. Reading the article should be required for commenting.
    • Can you recommend me a good Pixel 7 on eBay? Because some are saying Gen 1, and I don't think that's what I want, right?
    • Close, but it is for any application starting, not just during boot time. In fact, it probably will not improve boot time at all because during a boot, the CPU is already boosting, so a pre-boost wouldn't change anything. I agree that it isn't exciting (especially considering every other OS already does it), but it is a good thing, even if they are just playing catch up.
    • Any so called performance increase will be in milliseconds, which nobody will actually notice in real world usage.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!