Post 3DMARK03 scores

[+StevoFC MVC]

anyone who could actually download the program, post your scores here...i want to see how bad my computer is haha, and the difference in scores from the older programs.

[Sniper]

3612

ati 9700 pro / with catalyst 3.1 drivers

p4 2.53 @ 2.85

512 megs of ddr333

asus p4pe motherboard

2 80 gig wd special edition hard drives

lian-li pc6083a case

antec 430 power

audigy 2

yamaha f1 44x burner

pioneer 16x slot load

hmm... your score seems to be a little low ... i got almost the same hardware that you got and i benchmarked 4625.... so you migh wanna check your pc for problems...

where would you suggest to look.

everything ( as far as i know ) is fine.

games play great, full detail with no problems.

things did seem pretty choppy though during the 3dmark2003 benchmarks.

i adjusted the settings for my vid card to be set at optimal performance and turned off things like vertical sync and trueform.

any suggestions ?

i thought my score seemed a little low. :blush:

[adam2001]

Well i read somewhere probably on Neowin that 3DMark03 is geared towards shader performance and directX 9 stuff and all that so the GF4 series wont be up to the challenge as well as a GeForce FX card would be. Dont be bothered about benchmarks they dont really show real world performance and thats all that matters.

You want to spend ?1000's just so you can get a higher benchmark score i have one thing that you should ask yourself "Do i have a life?"

[autodefe]

Every time I've executed 3D Mark (now and in the past), it's never NOT depressed me about my current hardware setup.

I got 1081 marks. :wacko:

Then again, my processor is nearing 2 years old :) And I'm not looking to upgrade. This app is just what computer makers LOVE.

[Dazzla Veteran]

:o :o

That was just playing around seeing if I could reach the magic 10k.

Here's at the default settings:

[mart3ll]

poor Photoshop skills... try getting the text the right size.

[Spyder Veteran]

poor Photoshop skills... try getting the text the right size.

hahahahaha dazzla has poor photoshop skills? if he photoshops something and doesn't want you to know it, you won't. plain and simple.

anyways thanks..i was needing that laugh today.

[Dazzla Veteran]

poor Photoshop skills... try getting the text the right size.

Except it isn't photoshop :rolleyes:

I ran at 320 resolution just to see if I could break 10k. The 4585 is at the default settings.

[tomwarren Veteran]

poor Photoshop skills... try getting the text the right size.

Love your username, contact an admin if you want a nickchange btw ;)

[nomis_nehc]

Scored a mere 4512 points : http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=17512

:laugh:

?! How the hell? I have a faster CPU than you and I even oc'ed my 9700 Pro to 350/680 and you have double of my score...?

I did notice that our BIOS version for 9700 is different... can that have anything to do with it... mmm

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=21331

[+StevoFC MVC]

1479 3DMarks

Athlon XP 2100+

1GB DDR 2700

VisionTek GeForce ti4600

Windows XP

I understand the whole DX9 issue and why Nvidia cards score lower than the ATI 9700s, but I'm still seeing a lot of people with slower CPUs, less RAM and older GeForce cards beat my score. Thought it might be because I'm running a dual display, but disabled that, and the score remained the same.

mine gets 1487 3DMarks

and i have a 1.5ghz p4, 640mb RDRAM, and a GeForce4 Ti4200

i will give a compare link when the site actually works...i tried to send it but it says their server is down...

[S.MULLA]

well my system got an excellent kik ass 13.....6 points... :rolleyes:

amd 2200+

512mb

Badass Geforce..2MX 64mb

60gb hdd...

hmm... :shifty:

only 1 of the 4 tests ran..and i could'nt view the demo... :pinch:

[Dazzla Veteran]

1479 3DMarks

Athlon XP 2100+

1GB DDR 2700

VisionTek GeForce ti4600

Windows XP

I understand the whole DX9 issue and why Nvidia cards score lower than the ATI 9700s, but I'm still seeing a lot of people with slower CPUs, less RAM and older GeForce cards beat my score. Thought it might be because I'm running a dual display, but disabled that, and the score remained the same.

mine gets 1487 3DMarks

and i have a 1.5ghz p4, 640mb RDRAM, and a GeForce4 Ti4200

i will give a compare link when the site actually works...i tried to send it but it says their server is down...

Yeah, I couldn't submit my results. Perhaps that's what I need to do to show grafXguru how 1337 I am with my "fake, photoshopped" score...

9000+ = instant e-penis...

[+StevoFC MVC]

9000+ = instant e-penis...

haha

[Khujo]

5150

[jimmyt302]

5150

LOL

[nomis_nehc]

LOL

me too.

but I won't absolutely doubt it though. This test is really confusing me on many aspects...

[nomis_nehc]

Ok, after various tinkering and whatnot, I present my brand new spanking score. A total of 1569 points increase.

You guys are probably thinking 'wtf' 'cause I am certainly thinking WTF?!

Once again, specs is as follows:

2000+

pc2700 512mb

radeon 9700 pro

[+StevoFC MVC]

my goal is to get my GeForce4 Ti4200 over 1500 3DMarks :D

[+StevoFC MVC]

wooo finally, haha

1505 3DMarks Compare

1.5ghz P4, 640mb RDRAM, GeForce4 Ti4200

[+BeLGaRaTh Subscriber¹]

What 'optimisations' are u guys doing to increase scores? Just interested as you seem to be able to get the scores to jump quite a lot. :unsure:

[Premgenius]

I got

I'm happy with it cos my machine is not that powerful anyway.

[+StevoFC MVC]

wow i forgot about this thread

[xe9rox]

i got 1310 points on 3Dmark03, and im running

p4 2GHz

gf 5900 lx 128MB

256 MB ram

some cheap shuttle motherboard

[Creamy]

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...388&hl=3dmark03

Thread closed

Can i get member of Thread closed? ;)

[farmeunit]

5564

2.4 P4

1 Gig RAM

ATI 9800 PRO

Asus P4P800 Deluxe

Nothing overclocked and running at default settings.